Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

hollyh88

Member
  • Content Count

    541
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hollyh88

  1. its about the same price of a good oled 1499. the PHILIPS 55OLED903/12 So yeah that with added burnin risk i rather not pull the pin on that grenade i can get a cheap 4k tv for 400 bucks but.. i rather want a good one. and i do not need ambilight from philips due to my tv not being against a wall. or need sony due to well sony's support in the netherlands isnt the best. And i like samsung and their costumer support. but prices are always high due to import costs for europe. i wish most companies would start to produce it here. it would really make the prices better but eh cant have everything.
  2. dont have a best buy in the netherlands and i wouldnt have a curved tv monitor is fine but tv is not good to have it curved
  3. yeah thanks for the responds i looked at the list and i think ill go with the q70. the q80 is about 1600 euros and is never in a sale. the q70 is about 1400 but has been in sale a few times all the way down to 900 ish. And currently an action going on where you can buy a q70 for 1450 euros and you get an xbox one s + a game for free. i might actually go for that. as much as i am rather a playstation fan due to the better controller design. anything for free is never something you could pass up. but i might see whether ill wait till its on sale again. I decided on the q70 55 inch due to it having 120 hz thus for gaming its ideal. and it also has better reflection controle (even though its in my bed room it will still be good to have) and better brightness thus hdr10+. sadly not dolby but thats fine. cant have everything i guess
  4. well as i stated my budget is about 1000 euros
  5. true but going from a 6 core to another 6 core is a bit of a side grade in my eyes. It's better to go with 8 cores. since that would be an actual hardware imrpovement too.
  6. yeah if it doesnt have issue with a 5700xt it shouldnt with a 2070 super even though it has a bit more power. But i think ill wait till next gen comes or the 3700x gets a good discount. i rather have a bit of an upgrade. instead of going to another 6 core
  7. So as the title says im looking for a new tv. my old tv is some philips 1080p tv. With ambilight. its good but.... its not GOOD. So i wanted to take the next logical step up which would be a 4k. Im going to be using it(netflix, disney+, normal tv channels etc) for tv and gaming so i would like it to be "60hz" and up. I'm looking for one below 1000 bucks. Preferably from samsung lg or philips. And i would like it to be new as in this year or last year so it basically has all the good stuff you would want in a tv. ofc picture quality is also something good but i do also like the best sound. I do however won't mind getting a soundbar for it. So that is fine. so if anyone has any suggestion please list them below. and or if you have it yourself i would appriciate a summary of it . thanks!
  8. the amd guy said that there was no issue. so now i am clueless cause clearly there is. i just think that perhaps the 2600x isnt good enough to keep up with a 2070 super then. so that definatly needs to be upgraded.
  9. ofc, they are cheaper here than intel parts. you can get a 2600x at 130 bucks here in the netherlands. any overclockable good intel 6 core part is at/above 220 bucks. or how about 8 core parts. 2700x 170 bucks closest intel 8 part overclockable cpu? 363 bucks. amd clearly wins when talking about cpu. Gpu however.. different story. here you can better save a bit more and get a 2070 super than get a 5700xt that is good and at around 500 bucks. Just not worth it.
  10. i still have about 24 months of warranty so i can totally return it but yeah i contacted them. but even if it is a microsoft issue how would they be able to fix it lol.
  11. i could try it yes cause that usage % doesn't make alot of sense.
  12. try and get a regular 2070 if they can still be found. if not if you have the money get a 2070 super and upgrade to a 3070 when they release. but that is a bit overkill for 1080p high refresh but... its better to have a bit of overkill than needing to tweak settings.
  13. the fans don't run til it hits 60 degrees. they don't run fast. and even when they do you hear them but it's not annoying. it's easy to ignore when under a gaming load. i can simply have it around 60/65% and you don't even hear it. it keeps it around 60-70c. mind you this is while overclocked. i personally got it stable in most games with a 100 on the core and 880 on the memory. even without an overclock it doesnt even reach the 70c. the software is well i have no issues with it. you can use their overclocking software but i use afterburner for the overlay. its a good card. especially if you want to game at 1080p. you will be able to do this at high refresh for the upcoming years for sure.
  14. no. the singleplayer is the core game that they advertise. the multiplayer is not tied to the singleplayer.it doesnt come out with the singleplayer game. it is something different. I dont do gymnastics to defend this company im simply stating a fact. they said that the singleplayer and multiplayer are different. when you buy it you get the singleplayer game. no micro transactions just a good game. With paid dlc later to be added like blood and wine. The multiplayer part is separated. it isn't in the devopment at the same time as the singleplayer. in fact they only recently started on it. And it's still in it's basic concept form. It won't be out when the core game gets released. thus it's not part of the game. It ofc is part of cyberpunk but it's not together with the singleplayer game that you purchase at launch.
  15. yeah otherwise i am kinda forced to change to a 3600/x orso to not get this terrible cpu bottlenecked for no reason. Like my gpu is in several games even tho tripple a incapeable of hitting at the very least 99% usage. 90-96% constantly this guy 98/99% contstantly. this is ofc only a minor example of the 70% orso in battlefield. but the difference is there. and yes you can somewhat say that it has to do with the location. but the rural farm area in that dlc are easier to run than the city. i dont know why else my gpu wouldnt be fully utilized than the cpu. probably due to windows and so on but i have no way of 100% knowing that.
  16. doesn't need to dream. all that needs to be done is making a gpu with strong enough power to properly use raytracing. which will happen with next gen current gen is just a stepping stone. but its a stepping stone to something big
  17. 18 months makes total sense i bought it to enjoy it and get a good improvement over my regular 1070. still though. 18 months is still 1 and a half years. there will be way better versions out then. Think of the 3070 ti or super whichever they want to call it. next gen gpu's from nvidia come next year and will have a way better increase in raytracing performance. due to them simply not allowing amd to take that win away since their consoles and ofc gpu's will also be supporting it.
  18. how have they lied? they promised that there wouldnt be microtransactions in their cyberpunk 2077 game. which is the core singleplayer game. Not the totally different multiplayer game. they didn't lie.
  19. https://www.cyberpunk.net/de/en/pre-order Not what it will actually be tho. its an 18 year and older game. Just like the witcher is. Well its 17+ in the us since according to us law a teenager becomes an adult at 17 and not 18. so i dont know where you get your 13 from. cause that isn't going to happen. it contains swearing, nudity, gambling etc. that is not a 13 year and older rating in the us. not even for the biased esrb company.
  20. i checked the temperatures of the motherboard first it isnt even touching the 60 degrees when gaming. So thats not an issue either. perhaps it could be windows taking my 2600x down. don't know why though. hope they look into this
×