Weric

Thanks yall, mind at ease again.

Cheers lol. Yea I wasn't worried about the temp itself, more so that I would see thgat spike on the desktop opening things and downloading, but during a 100% load I wouldn't break 72. But someone just mentioned(dunno why I didn't think about it, I'm dumb), under 100% load my heatsink is ramped, its not ramped during desktop use)

And in here my CPU temps read a little colder than Ai suites CPU package(bottom where it says CPU 36, Motherboard 37, CPU Package 42)

So the one that has the red line next to it I normally don't pay much attention to The one with the green line next to it is the one that I'll see a spike up to 78 The core temps with the pink lines won't hit that 78 mark. So my core temps are colder than the ccd1(tdie) Edit my color marks aren't showing up, glah Red line= CPU(TCTL/TDIE) Green line= CPU CCD1(TDIE) Pink= Core temps

Thats what I was thinking, after all my stress tests the temps are good. But then loading up programs or downloading a game I can see a quick spike up to 78. It just confuses me a bit as to why cinebench and prime95 wont take me to 78-80, but Ill get quick jumps in my desktop loadong up a bunch of things or downloadong a game at 1gb/s

So in Hwinfo ya know you have core temps and average, tdid ccd1 and 2 My tdie ccd1 will spike sometimes up to 78 when loading stuff, but my core temps wont hit that. When running Prim95 or Cinebench I hover around 68-72. 1) Should I pay attenrion to my core temps or the tdie ccd1 2) Why is it when I stress the cpu with cinebench or Prime95 I hover around 68-72, but when loading a few things on the desktop or downloading a game, Ill see a quick spike to 78. You'd think you'd hit that when stressing the cpu?

Hello againnnnn!! So let me say what my current settings are real fast. I'm running a 5900x on an NH-D15S In the AMD Overclocking PBO settings I have a curve optimizer of 29, and a Thermal limit of 80(I rarely went over 80, but the other day when I was playing Apex that sucker hit 86 outa no where for a few minutes, and it hadn't done it after) I know, I don't need the thermal limit, but I'm old and my brain isn't used to the 80c+ lol. I have a DoCp enabled for my RAM as well. Now, when running a game, like Apex, Path of Exile and such, and I monitor my clock speeds, I see my clocks all hitting 4.85, 4.95, 4.875 on every core(unless there's a delay and its really NOT at the same time? Hwinfo shows the same time though) When running Cinebench multi-core test, I cap out around 4.3 all core and don't go over 70c if I even reach 70c. Keep in mind I was still hitting 4.3 on the multicore test BEFORE putting that thermal limit of 80 on there. Any quick way to raise that 4.3 all core? I suppose the only quick way would be to go in the PBO options and raise the clock threshold eh? I'm ok with 4.3, it doesn't bother me, my PC is doing what I want and I finish compression jobs much faster than I did on my 9700k. So I'm just curious. It gets hot in my upstairs bedroom in the summer, like 80 F, which is why I messed around and undervolted. Thankfully its starting to cool down and it will get COLD up here. Thanks in advance

Hey folk. So I undervolted my 5900x in my bios. I went to the PBO option in Overclocking and set my curve optimizer. However I know there is a PBO menu in Ai Tweaker(seperate from the pbo settings in Advanced) My question is do I need to have the PBO in Ai tweaker set to enabled in order for my pbo curve options under advanced to work? Rivht now its set to Auto under ai tweaker

Thats really weird. Yea my PC didn't BSOD either it just straight up rebooted and I saw the event viewer. -25 seems to be working for now, hopefully its sorted out. I really hope it does though, I'd rather not go below -25 cuz I don't see much reduction in Temps when I'm at -20.

Thanks. After doing some digging I'm seeing a lot of folk have this issue with their 5950x and 5900x, the majority of them were using the curve optimizer, so I'm leaning towards -30 not working out very well despite it being fine playing some games and running like half a cinebench test lol. Also a good bunch of folk on reddit with 5900x were getting these crashes on fresh installs with all STOCK settings and actually had to put a positive offset of +4 in curve optimizer and it got their systems stable. Weird, hopefully setting it to -25 solves it though

Hey folk, new 5900x installed, temps are good, everything good. Recently I set a curve in PBO to a negative offset of 30(the max). The next couple days, playing games and being idle were fine. Today I booted up my PC and when I went to launch web browser, I had a restart. The error was fatal hardware error, cpu core. I lowered the offset to 25 instead. Think this is from my undervolting? Fresh windows with the basics installed, no overclock or nothin, just had the PBO undervolt curve set to 30 which was fine for a couple days playing some games. I didn't do any long benchmarks either

Hey yall. So my daughter is running a 3700x on an Asrock X570M Pro4, and today(I never checked before) I was just looking around at HwInfo and noticed her Minimum number for the Power Deviaiton Accuracy stat was 83%, and in red. After looking at some articles and tooltips it says it only matters when the cpu is at full load, so I run a cinebench for single and multicore and it did indeed drop down to 83% during the benchmark. Should I be worried? Is there something I can do?(Going to update Bios, noticed it wasn't totally up to date)

I'm running a 5900x with a Noctua NH-D15S(Not the standard NH-D15), which is made to fit over RAM, the RAM I'm using is Corsair Vengeance LPX series(4 sticks) and my temps are really good. Idles at 30-35, hits 65-70c when doing cinebench, games aren't taking it into the 80's, normally 55-65(unless its Warzone then it'll run around 73). Plenty of space from the heatsink and the RAM modules.

How many sticks of RAM? 4? Are all 4 the same? If they aren't from the same kit, check the timings on the side of 1 kit and the 2nd kit. Could also be bad RAM that can't run at advertised speeds and need an RMA? Could also try messing with timings yourself if you know what you're doing. Not an issue I've had to deal with very much, but the few times XMP enabled stopped a boot into Windows was due to two seperate kits being used(same brand) and they had different timings, and another time it was straight up bad RAM.

Hello folks! So just yesterday I rebuilt my PC with a 5900x, took out my old boot drive with windows on it, and put in a new 1tb SSD and did a clean install of win 10. After doing performance tests, the Read speed is good at 540, but my sequential write speed was at 83.... I'm going to run it again in case something was going on in the background during testing, but something is off. AHCI is enabled in Bios, showing AHCI controller in device manager. Not sure what is going on. My boot priority only has the 1 Drive and its showing as Windows Boot Manager(870 Evo 1tb so on and so on). They're plugged in the 6g/s sata ports, and not those special Media sata ports either. Whats going on Edit: Nevermind! I updated the firmware and ran another test, getting normal speeds now. Either the firmware needed to be updated, or me exiting a web browser during the test really made the SSD shit its pants lol.

So I went ahead and installed Warzone, at high even without Vsync on I was hovering between 65-77. Not what I'm used to on my 9700k, but normal from everyones account. Just gonna have to get my brain to be ok with those temps being normal these days lol.

I haven't tried Warzone yet, I'm going to now that you've mentioned it lol. If it gets into the 80's I'm just going to set a negative curve offset through PBO. I know these chips are made to hang in those temps, but my brain just can't handle it lol.

Ok, cool, thanks man. Yea Noctua is really awesome they're all I use when I go Air. It was just scaring me a bit that FFXIv was taking my 5900x to 45-55 where my 9700k would sit at 35-45. Made me think other games would make it get hotter. Then again, my 9700k clock wasn't going to 4,9, I had it underclocked a bit to cap at 4.5 and an avx offset. This 5900x is full blown stock. Hopefully my brain will get used to the new numbers. I went through the same thing when I went from an i7 6800k to my 9700k and the temps were higher lol. Cooling a 6800k was so stupid easy

Thanks man ok I feel better now lol. What was bugging me most was that FFXIV, such a low intensive game was taking my 5900x to 45-55, where with my 9700k it would rarely ever get to 55. So it had me thinking shit..... maybe I'll be in the 80's on stock playing some high intensive game. I really need to get a 1440p panel and stop beating on my CPU's lol

Hey guys and gals. So I recently threw in a 5900x in my system, cooled with an NH-D15S. Its in a HAF XM case. My previous CPU was a 9700k, which I had an offset of 2 set on so it didn't go nuts during AVX workloads on temps. Anyway, if I were playing FFXIV with the 9700k, my temps would be roughly 38-50 with an average of 45. With the 5900x its more 45-55 with an average of 48. Ok, no biggy Witcher 3 with my 9700k would run 50-55(medium settings). With the 5900x and medium settings I'm hitting anyway from 55-67. Seeing 67 was a bit jarring as I'm not used to that(I'm on a 1080p panel atm too) I don't have PBO enabled either. Only using like 5% of the cpu in FFXIV, and 15% of the cpu in Witcher 3. When doing Cinebench Multi-core passes I hit up to 65 Single core passes it can get up to 70. Idling from 30-35c I know it has 4 more cores than my 9700k, and there's no offset that keeps the clock speeds max boost down either. Anyway, would yall say these are decent temps? They're a little higher than I'm used to on my previous build, but I'm not feeling too bad about it? I just generally didn't reach 65's in games that often. New World took my 9700k to like 65-67 though. Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks

Thanks for the info. After about 2 hours of her playing, hwinfo had AVERAGE voltage at 1.3, but she was playin roblox that entire time. I havent used AMD since the Phenom II chips, so seeing these high voltages was irking me even after hearing that its how AMD made them lol. And I dont wanna set a static voltage on a Noctua U12S. Max temp was 65c. Just wanted to get some reassurance from someone else. Thanks again

Evening folks. So I just threw a 3700x in my daughters system, updated bios, installed chipset, updated all the drivers, fresh windows install blah blah. So, her average temps are fine, when gaming she's not breaking 55 degree's(was doing metro last light maxed out with PhysX on to mess around). Doesn't even hover around 55. However when she's playing Roblox there are spikes, and the highest its gotten(I haven't had Hwinfo open during this time, just seeing the max temp in MSI afterburner), is 70c. Now I've thrown cinebench on and that'll get it to 67-70, never goes over 70c. But when I'm looking at the stock MAX voltages, its hitting 1.48, 1.49. I've turned off precision overdrive, turned ON eco mode, the offset voltage setting is weird in the asrock board, instead of being able to set 0.5, it'll default to 6.xxx, then 12.xxxx in thge negatives, and even then if I set those settings it'll still hit 1.48. I know hitting 70c here and there MAX isn't a problem, its normal, especially when her every day average temps are fine. But any suggestions? I'd rather the core voltage not cap out at 1.48, but I don't wanna set a static voltage either. I could use the ryzen master crap I guess? But you have to load a profile every time you get on the PC. Or should I just not worry and leave it alone

Thanks for the opinions guys! I was really hoping they would have some updates or something to improve their nvenc encoder with Ampere, but they don't.