Jump to content

DePhoegon

Member
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Funny
    DePhoegon got a reaction from Fasauceome in (UPDATED - Claim has been removed) The Linux Gamer's response video to LTT got claimed by Fullscreen   
    I'll be honest with you..
     
    Your video does you zero favors.
    1. You spend the first 5+ minutes, trying to get people to not only question their own views to the point of being placid, but you also avoid mentioning it directly.
    -- No,  We don't know who the f you are.. you are not your real self online (and more power to you for it), you are not honest with your audance, and you operate so far in the dark when it comes to anything with 'drama' or 'conflict' that you could easily be the  kind of petty person who would do such things... We just do not know.
    ----  the fake stage beef that you have with others is for entertainment .. and as cool as that is, it is not who you are.
    2. While you think 'Drama free' to the point of aboslutely none to exist, is a virtue..  it isn't.    
    -- I acknowledge that it's smarter to not get dragged into a fight, but it's quite another & as bad as to operate completely in the dark and not even address the issues at hand, then blame those who are 'reacting' instead of .. having a response to it.
    3. TB (I feel for his family, to no end), has always been that douche level extreme prick.   He's never once appologized or retracted anything past 'professional' mistakes, and only minor ones that were not agenda driven.
    -- saying that, the fact that he would hold you accountable for your users.. because he was a special snowflake is nothing short of typical for him.
    4. Perhaps.. you know .. the problem is on you...  or your highered hand.    The automated system is with how flawed it is, only responding to how you or your authorized agents set it.
    5.  Maybe instead of blaming the audiance for being appauled on the system using your approved rule set against others, you appologize and promise to fix what is a mistake on your or your agents hands.  This is not their (the ones who got claimed), or the users faults.  it is YOURS.
    6.  You literally tossed someone under the buss, and assuming the internet isn't OCD enough to find the claimed person who went public, that also failed to get hired by you isn't a far stretch.
    -- bad form... for someone who doesn't want drama.
     
    I suspect that most .. who watch you.. while holding no ill against you, could tolerate being around you  for longer then a day.. and if I am honest,  I respect you and what you built.. but I geniunely can not see myself tolerating you in person for too long either, and yes it's the fact that you'll go passive aggressive, and 'dark' if conflict comes up.
  2. Funny
    DePhoegon got a reaction from sazrocks in (UPDATED - Claim has been removed) The Linux Gamer's response video to LTT got claimed by Fullscreen   
    I'll be honest with you..
     
    Your video does you zero favors.
    1. You spend the first 5+ minutes, trying to get people to not only question their own views to the point of being placid, but you also avoid mentioning it directly.
    -- No,  We don't know who the f you are.. you are not your real self online (and more power to you for it), you are not honest with your audance, and you operate so far in the dark when it comes to anything with 'drama' or 'conflict' that you could easily be the  kind of petty person who would do such things... We just do not know.
    ----  the fake stage beef that you have with others is for entertainment .. and as cool as that is, it is not who you are.
    2. While you think 'Drama free' to the point of aboslutely none to exist, is a virtue..  it isn't.    
    -- I acknowledge that it's smarter to not get dragged into a fight, but it's quite another & as bad as to operate completely in the dark and not even address the issues at hand, then blame those who are 'reacting' instead of .. having a response to it.
    3. TB (I feel for his family, to no end), has always been that douche level extreme prick.   He's never once appologized or retracted anything past 'professional' mistakes, and only minor ones that were not agenda driven.
    -- saying that, the fact that he would hold you accountable for your users.. because he was a special snowflake is nothing short of typical for him.
    4. Perhaps.. you know .. the problem is on you...  or your highered hand.    The automated system is with how flawed it is, only responding to how you or your authorized agents set it.
    5.  Maybe instead of blaming the audiance for being appauled on the system using your approved rule set against others, you appologize and promise to fix what is a mistake on your or your agents hands.  This is not their (the ones who got claimed), or the users faults.  it is YOURS.
    6.  You literally tossed someone under the buss, and assuming the internet isn't OCD enough to find the claimed person who went public, that also failed to get hired by you isn't a far stretch.
    -- bad form... for someone who doesn't want drama.
     
    I suspect that most .. who watch you.. while holding no ill against you, could tolerate being around you  for longer then a day.. and if I am honest,  I respect you and what you built.. but I geniunely can not see myself tolerating you in person for too long either, and yes it's the fact that you'll go passive aggressive, and 'dark' if conflict comes up.
  3. Funny
    DePhoegon got a reaction from KWelz in (UPDATED - Claim has been removed) The Linux Gamer's response video to LTT got claimed by Fullscreen   
    I'll be honest with you..
     
    Your video does you zero favors.
    1. You spend the first 5+ minutes, trying to get people to not only question their own views to the point of being placid, but you also avoid mentioning it directly.
    -- No,  We don't know who the f you are.. you are not your real self online (and more power to you for it), you are not honest with your audance, and you operate so far in the dark when it comes to anything with 'drama' or 'conflict' that you could easily be the  kind of petty person who would do such things... We just do not know.
    ----  the fake stage beef that you have with others is for entertainment .. and as cool as that is, it is not who you are.
    2. While you think 'Drama free' to the point of aboslutely none to exist, is a virtue..  it isn't.    
    -- I acknowledge that it's smarter to not get dragged into a fight, but it's quite another & as bad as to operate completely in the dark and not even address the issues at hand, then blame those who are 'reacting' instead of .. having a response to it.
    3. TB (I feel for his family, to no end), has always been that douche level extreme prick.   He's never once appologized or retracted anything past 'professional' mistakes, and only minor ones that were not agenda driven.
    -- saying that, the fact that he would hold you accountable for your users.. because he was a special snowflake is nothing short of typical for him.
    4. Perhaps.. you know .. the problem is on you...  or your highered hand.    The automated system is with how flawed it is, only responding to how you or your authorized agents set it.
    5.  Maybe instead of blaming the audiance for being appauled on the system using your approved rule set against others, you appologize and promise to fix what is a mistake on your or your agents hands.  This is not their (the ones who got claimed), or the users faults.  it is YOURS.
    6.  You literally tossed someone under the buss, and assuming the internet isn't OCD enough to find the claimed person who went public, that also failed to get hired by you isn't a far stretch.
    -- bad form... for someone who doesn't want drama.
     
    I suspect that most .. who watch you.. while holding no ill against you, could tolerate being around you  for longer then a day.. and if I am honest,  I respect you and what you built.. but I geniunely can not see myself tolerating you in person for too long either, and yes it's the fact that you'll go passive aggressive, and 'dark' if conflict comes up.
  4. Funny
    DePhoegon got a reaction from The Benjamins in (UPDATED - Claim has been removed) The Linux Gamer's response video to LTT got claimed by Fullscreen   
    I'll be honest with you..
     
    Your video does you zero favors.
    1. You spend the first 5+ minutes, trying to get people to not only question their own views to the point of being placid, but you also avoid mentioning it directly.
    -- No,  We don't know who the f you are.. you are not your real self online (and more power to you for it), you are not honest with your audance, and you operate so far in the dark when it comes to anything with 'drama' or 'conflict' that you could easily be the  kind of petty person who would do such things... We just do not know.
    ----  the fake stage beef that you have with others is for entertainment .. and as cool as that is, it is not who you are.
    2. While you think 'Drama free' to the point of aboslutely none to exist, is a virtue..  it isn't.    
    -- I acknowledge that it's smarter to not get dragged into a fight, but it's quite another & as bad as to operate completely in the dark and not even address the issues at hand, then blame those who are 'reacting' instead of .. having a response to it.
    3. TB (I feel for his family, to no end), has always been that douche level extreme prick.   He's never once appologized or retracted anything past 'professional' mistakes, and only minor ones that were not agenda driven.
    -- saying that, the fact that he would hold you accountable for your users.. because he was a special snowflake is nothing short of typical for him.
    4. Perhaps.. you know .. the problem is on you...  or your highered hand.    The automated system is with how flawed it is, only responding to how you or your authorized agents set it.
    5.  Maybe instead of blaming the audiance for being appauled on the system using your approved rule set against others, you appologize and promise to fix what is a mistake on your or your agents hands.  This is not their (the ones who got claimed), or the users faults.  it is YOURS.
    6.  You literally tossed someone under the buss, and assuming the internet isn't OCD enough to find the claimed person who went public, that also failed to get hired by you isn't a far stretch.
    -- bad form... for someone who doesn't want drama.
     
    I suspect that most .. who watch you.. while holding no ill against you, could tolerate being around you  for longer then a day.. and if I am honest,  I respect you and what you built.. but I geniunely can not see myself tolerating you in person for too long either, and yes it's the fact that you'll go passive aggressive, and 'dark' if conflict comes up.
  5. Agree
    DePhoegon got a reaction from mr moose in Win 10 NSA exploit thought   
    1. Where is this 'said document' that proves any of that?
    -- outside on a site that uses more clickbait then I've seen in a while
    2. Where is this 'said document'
    -- Outside a very clickbaity & ad driven view site.
    3. Invalidated by the first one.
     
    Though you're missing the point entirely as well..  because None of those 'partnerships' if you're paranoid enough to believe them (and to be clear true or not, it doesn't matter) is that... they NEVER REQUIRED AN EXPLOIT TO BE DEVELOPED.
    --as in there never was an exploit in any of these stories, and honestly ..  these are the click baitest things I've seen in a long long time.
     
    again, If they where in bed with each other.... THERE WOULD BE NO NEED FOR AN EXPLOIT TO HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED, the NSA would have 'annon' access to the systems to execute code, without any need for development on their part.
     
  6. Like
    DePhoegon got a reaction from Dragonheart in Win 10 NSA exploit thought   
    I personally just have to wonder if these 'tools' had never leaked, would that have been worse then it leaking & the wannna make me cry malware getting it.
     
    Though I will point this out...  The exploits (while not clearly stated on the wan show) .. allowed execution of external code w/o user permissions needed.
    -Of which the NSA had access to for a long time.
     
    The major problem that was skirted around or missed is that..   'Is it really smart for businesses to not keep on the updates, when the NSA is often known to have exploits to all the major OS's'  
     
    When is it no longer MS fault, and it lays on the feet of those who actively choose to not update?
     
    How much data, & how many times has the NSA exploited this... and Just why is it acceptable to blame MS for not being clear about their updates....  (because announcing that they patched XYZ exploits just seems like a morbidly horrible idea... because it lets the ones know about it, that exploiting it.. and giving them some notice to counter/work around it)
     
    Though,  Is it one to wonder if this 'leak' was purposeful to a bs group to create a FU worm.to see how many actually patch... and how likely their exploits will continue to work against their targets (businesses & targets with a large amount of personal data) & just when they will need to redevelop exploits & such.
     
    That windows Source code isn't to hard to get (for those that truly look for it) and every country Windows is sold in, their government has the source code. (and every government would likely have developers looking for exploits)   With that...  Mind you that they still have the same teams, and the source code for Linux is available to them, and that those teams get paid Major dollars to find exploits & bugs, and is it to much to think that 'defense' orginazations would find a way to weaponize them for their own ends.
     
    I personally would like to know what Linus reply would be, in regards to the fact that... if these leaks were never known...  & that the exploits allowed execution of code...  do you really think that 'telemetry data'(to MS) is really the problem that should be focused on, and if recommending a hard stance against updates is smart.
  7. Agree
    DePhoegon got a reaction from kirashi in Win 10 NSA exploit thought   
    Right.. because they totally developed the holes in the source code they give to every nation. *coughs*
     
    Pretending MS knows all... and can plan for all day 1.. is some what silly.  
    -This is why there is 'Windows Updates', to patch Exploits & problems that they didn't know about, & the fact that it was fixed asap & rolled out in updates  is literally the best that anyone could reasonably expect from any OS developer/maintainer.
     
    This is more a credit on NSA developers that were able to see an exploit within the Source code that MS missed, and if we are honest...  They aren't bad really. 
     
    They(NSA) developed the exploit..  They didn't just find it in the code.
     
    Which part of the reason I would lay the blame on those that actually developed the exploit & those refusing to patch security related patches on the OS (for what ever reasons they have)
     
  8. Like
    DePhoegon got a reaction from mvitkun in FX8350 vs i5 3570K (GTX 670) --> Teksyndicate   
    I am honestly thinking if you are comparing 'gaming CPU' and you want to do the ... 'questionable' tests that he did, and you actually have the balls to bring a price point into it, then there is no way you should legitly use 1440p Resolutions, because the displays that are capable of that are ANYTHING but budget, and currently for gaming a 720p or 1080p monitor is king, because games just aren't optimized for the ultra high end displays yet *blaming consoles holding back gaming development, atleast I am*
    With that said, the tests that were ran, were unrealistic, and ... even the 2nd video produced questionable results.
    I Can easily match & beat 'barely' the metro 2033 benchmarks on a SLI GTX 550 ti, on a Sabertooth x58 using a i7-960. That alone calls into some serious question about the results of his test, using a GTX 670, or the 7870. I love my computer to death, and am over protective to a fault, but I'm not dumb, and kinda expect those GPU's to beat out my setup.
    -That is assuming there isn't some crazy increase in Windows 8, with SLI on the X58 platform under 16x/16x, that some how is able to generate insane amount of performance, that could expect to match or beat 670's or 7870.
×