G1K777

... Weird question, but yeah. If it's not NSFW/really offensive or a rip-off/impersonation of someone else's pfp then there shouldn't be any issues. 

That's sooo damn cool!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjXbxG8YRKw

That's sooo damn cool!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjXbxG8YRKw

Generally, phase change cooling uses the heat of evaporation.
F.e. - when you want to heat up water, you need just above 4 jouls to raise temperature for 1 Kelvin degree (Celcius) of 1 gram of water.
To evaporate this 1 gram, you need over 2200 jouls.
To get this 1 gram of water to boiling temp, lets say from 20 C to 100C - you need 80 times 4.192 - around 260 jouls.
Evaporation of this gram needs almost 10 times more energy.
 
Evaporation is a complicated process, but shortly speaking - it can "suck" energy from the material.
Evaporating water can lower temperature of the surface from which it evaporates even BELOW ambient.
Thats how our sweating works - microdrops of sweat evaporate.
 
Condesation is the oposite process and this heat is released to the material on which steam condensate.
 
But do not confuse this phase change systems with systems that use compressors.
Compressing gas (air, steam or another gas) heats up this gas. Laws of physics. When you release the gas and pressure drops - the temperature also drops to the level before compressing.
 
This is used to create a temperature delta, difference between gas and surrounding - you can cool this compressed and warm gas, and then release it - its temperature will drop for the same amount of degrees.
F.e. you compress gas and heat it from 20C to 80C degrees. Your ambient temp is 20C - you run this warm gas through radiator, it cools down to lets say 30C. Than you release, and it cools down for 60C (as it went up from 20 to 80), but starting from 30C, and you have -30C gas.
Sorry, I don't use Freedomheit degrees ;-).
 
Generally, you don't have to use compressor in phase change system - pump is enough just to push gas to condenser.

Using a E580 and I'm very happy with it.

If it's well commented it should be fine to use. So far everytime i had to work with a SPF (single page file) it was because the company contract ended with their former tech company so as we started to support their in-house apps we also supported their website and had these kind of webpage to support. We had about 3-4 dozen of such projects in the last 6 years i would say and none of them had a single comments so we always redo their website from scratch. But like i said, if there was comments it would probably be supportable. Otherwise it's a bunch of spaghetti code. Seriously a single file with over 120-150 thousands line of code is hell without comments.
 
Long story short : comment, comment, comment ?

When I upload videos to YouTube, in the monetization settings, under "usage policy", I get "Linus Tech Tips" as a pulldown option.  What does that mean?  I thought it may have been a temporary glitch, but it's still occurring today.
 

 
 
 

There's soooooo many things that do this.  Not saying dont do it, hell no its a fantastic exercise and I learnt alot making a thingy like this once.  But just saying. 
Every time you see JSX it gets converted to something like this and many other things have this approach minus the jsx. 
One great example to look at is Mithril.....
https://mithril.js.org/#hello-world
...I picked Mithril because its great and most its docs show the none JSX versions but there is a jsx transpiler if you want to look at it.

I just replace it, what ever, if it sounds like this, I don't want it. It sounds like a damaged bearing.

Yes, and?
Even a bit more.
But keeping the Card a Year or two longer and only upgrade every 4-5 Years instead of 2 saves more and is better for the enviroment than save a watt or two....
 
Yes and what about the 150W for the CPU OC?? You know that the Intel 9900K is around 200-270W when it is allowed to run free, even without much OC?
What about the 50-100W on the GPU OC?? For Overclocking the other GPU...
 
 
 
 
If you want to save money, you play with a lower end card and don't get a higher end card like a VEGA56 or VEGA64.
 
To argue with power efficiency or something is kinda hypocritical in this regard.
 
 
 
 
I'm using windows and the nVidia Driver Panel is shit.
It looks almost the same as 20 years ago when I actually bougth an nVidia Card new.
 
I think a Geforce 4 was the last that I got new...
No, its bullshit.
Because you see here that nobody really cares about the envirment.
And if you did care about it, you'd not use a game PC to surf the Internet, you'd use a specialized office PC.
 
of course you had to mention this bullshit.
You know what's bad for the enviroment?
Replacing your perfectly fine Graphics card and buy a new one for no reason.
You know who tends to be the ones to buy new cards, because their old ones have "lost performance"?? 
 
Just look at how Radeon HD7970 and GTX680 perform today.
The even more expensive GTX680 has to fight with Pitcairn Cards -> Radeon HD7870, the 7970 is out of reach in many games.
 
Yes, wich is why you can open Games -> Global Settings, Global Wattman and Choose the "Auto Undervolt" Option, hit Apply.
Then you activate Radeon Chill
Then you activate VSYNC.
 
That should reduce the power consumption dramatically.

The difference of VSync On/Off with my Crossfire Setup in Murdered - Soul Suspect was around 200W,...
The electric cars will cause more than that and you know that we have mostly coal power plants in Germany.

But I forgot, its important how it looks for YOU, not how it really is in the world.
If the Pollution happens in China or Taiwan, you don't care.
 
And there are already situations where the 2080 performs like shit. That is when the game asks for more than 8GiB VRAM. That can happen for example in the "Geothermal Valley" in one of the new Tomb Raider Games. 
 
"But but but VEGA also only has 8GiB VRAM!!! - gotcha".
 
Yeah, but also a new Texture Caching thing implemented that is based on a victim cache design, that throws the things that aren't needed out of the GPU VRAM into the SYSTEM RAM and dynamically loads it when its needed.
 
And if you're really interested in Hardware and facts, you know that you can tune VEGA very well in either direction, however you want it. You can "easily" increase its efficiency or you can increase its performance further. Some people say even over 1080ti performance, if you want it to that is.
No I care about the earth but in my book, you have to see the whole picture, and that means to take the cost of manufacturing into account.
So not just the claim that "oh, Card A consumes X watt more, its worse for the Enviroment!!11" 

Yeah and what about manufacturing of the DRAM? Soldering the Chips onto the Board, the plastic for the casing of the GDDR-DRAM, failure rate.
And also the probable replacement rate!
 
Its the same for cars. Electric cars aren't better for the enviroment, they only look better to people who don't care about cost of manufacturing - and recycling of the car. Or how the power for the car is generated. The best thing for the enviroment, the greenest thing you can do is get some car, repair that and drive that for the next 20 years.
 
 
But this is not a Forum for cars or politics. And it isn't as black/white as you think. You have to look at the whole picture.
 

yeah going for rtx 2060 then xD. Also, power draw on vega 64 is ridiculous so yeah

If they're global variables then they can be accessed by any file
 
Although, this isn't really a good way of doing things. I suggest using something like webpack and split the code into modules which can be imported and executed in the main file

EIther set them in the global scope, or set it in the window object.
 
Again, I suggest using modules instead

Compare the sounds with the sounds recorded on the following website:
 
Failing hard drive sounds - Datacent.com - Datacent
 
If there is a match, look for how to replace the HDD as soon as possible. These recorded sounds are an imminent failure warning.

Linus backs up his servers.

Maybe I lost a semicolon or something...
 

SSD's don't make any sound....

Hold on, I'm confused, for some magic reason, it's working ??
I'm SOO CONFUSED why didn't it work before?! what the heck?!

Hold on, I'm confused, for some magic reason, it's working ??
I'm SOO CONFUSED why didn't it work before?! what the heck?!

Version 2.1 is the latest @G1K777

With AJAX you'll need to parse the response and execute actions according to that.
 
For example, if the log in is successful, the server can send a success response and the client can either refresh, redirect to another page, or do anything else, but that is up to how the site is designed. The client can display an error message if the server sends such response or the connection fails.
 
You can start and set the session while sending the server response, since PHP sets a cookie to identify the client and match it with a session, but the client must act on the response

Option 2:
GNU v3 FREE FOR ALL = Donations (+ maybe patreon... + bitcoins?).

Option 2:
GNU v3 FREE FOR ALL = Donations (+ maybe patreon... + bitcoins?).

You can just type [ code ] [/ code ] without the spaces to add code.

Your test on that test site is flawed, you should have declared the array.prototype function in the setup.  Right now its doing it ever test which will slow it down alot. And pre declaring the function and not as an argument can speed things up a bit aswell.
http://jsben.ch/3H35T

 
(function() { // Generate the test array with random strings let arr = []; for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { arr[i] = Math.random().toString(36).substring(2, 3 + Math.floor(Math.random() * 9)); } Array.prototype.loop = function(func) { let l = this.length; for (let i = 0; i < l; i++) { func(this[i]); } } const add = (x)=>o += x; let o = ''; var loop; console.time(loop = 'Loop - for -') for (let i of arr) { add(i); } console.timeEnd(loop); o = ''; console.time(loop = 'Loop - prototype -') arr.loop(add); console.timeEnd(loop); // console.log(o) console.log('Array length', arr.length); } )(); One browser is faster at one and the other the other...hehe, this is the point where people tell you that micro benchimarking is a fools game and most of the time its just best to write code thats easiest to read, debug, test, blah, blah.  And most of the time they're right.