kuzko

They only need to eliminate the unpaid part . BTW we (production line workers) have a similar issue with "time frames". they basically legally allowed to create negative hours when there is no work(meaning we dont even go to work, and get pain like normal), then when needed we most go to work even on weekends for (almost) no extra money.... Biggest problem is they also write negative hours when its their fault meaning they supposed to swallow it, not write it onto us.

Hash, salt, and pepper. 

Soup, salad, breadsticks

I am unsure if not using any encryption at all, ... or using the browser bar to pass around data is the worse offense.
Seriously, both are inexcusable.

Now we just need an rtx 2070 5gb, rtx 2070 3gb, rtx 2070 ddr4 and rtx 2070 6gb.
Also a version with raytracing cores disabled called the gtx 2070. Thanks @PatXioPC for the idea.

This attack needs : frequency scaling and turbo boost off... it's a  poor attack with pretty weak bases considering most of HT intel SKUs come with those enabled.
In case you want to run the code : https://github.com/bbbrumley/portsmash
Also, as a guess, due to the "small bits of exfiltrated data at a time" nature of the attack, cryptography with Perfect Forward Secrecy (industry standard nowadays) might remain pretty unaffected.

This attack needs : frequency scaling and turbo boost off... it's a  poor attack with pretty weak bases considering most of HT intel SKUs come with those enabled.
In case you want to run the code : https://github.com/bbbrumley/portsmash
Also, as a guess, due to the "small bits of exfiltrated data at a time" nature of the attack, cryptography with Perfect Forward Secrecy (industry standard nowadays) might remain pretty unaffected.

This attack needs : frequency scaling and turbo boost off... it's a  poor attack with pretty weak bases considering most of HT intel SKUs come with those enabled.
In case you want to run the code : https://github.com/bbbrumley/portsmash
Also, as a guess, due to the "small bits of exfiltrated data at a time" nature of the attack, cryptography with Perfect Forward Secrecy (industry standard nowadays) might remain pretty unaffected.

This attack needs : frequency scaling and turbo boost off... it's a  poor attack with pretty weak bases considering most of HT intel SKUs come with those enabled.
In case you want to run the code : https://github.com/bbbrumley/portsmash
Also, as a guess, due to the "small bits of exfiltrated data at a time" nature of the attack, cryptography with Perfect Forward Secrecy (industry standard nowadays) might remain pretty unaffected.

This attack needs : frequency scaling and turbo boost off... it's a  poor attack with pretty weak bases considering most of HT intel SKUs come with those enabled.
In case you want to run the code : https://github.com/bbbrumley/portsmash
Also, as a guess, due to the "small bits of exfiltrated data at a time" nature of the attack, cryptography with Perfect Forward Secrecy (industry standard nowadays) might remain pretty unaffected.

This attack needs : frequency scaling and turbo boost off... it's a  poor attack with pretty weak bases considering most of HT intel SKUs come with those enabled.
In case you want to run the code : https://github.com/bbbrumley/portsmash
Also, as a guess, due to the "small bits of exfiltrated data at a time" nature of the attack, cryptography with Perfect Forward Secrecy (industry standard nowadays) might remain pretty unaffected.

This attack needs : frequency scaling and turbo boost off... it's a  poor attack with pretty weak bases considering most of HT intel SKUs come with those enabled.
In case you want to run the code : https://github.com/bbbrumley/portsmash
Also, as a guess, due to the "small bits of exfiltrated data at a time" nature of the attack, cryptography with Perfect Forward Secrecy (industry standard nowadays) might remain pretty unaffected.

*Laughs in perfectly working 10th series card*

Urgh another Rare Engram? where's my Legendary? i've been grinding for hours

Not surprised if they did. I'm fairly positive they reverse engineered Imagination's GPU tech in order to make their own.

The Chicken of Calamity.
 
Or the Code of Conduct.

What is even the POINT of having model names if they same model name can represent different hardware? D:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_ethics_and_standards
Happy?
 
I'm very surprised at your reactions here @Enderman. You're an intelligent and thoughtful forum user. You should well know what a conflict of interest is.
 
The fact that the PCPer reviewer, is the same person hired by Intel to write a technical white paper about the Optane drive's capabilities, etc, is a clear conflict of interest. Whether he himself is an unethical person or not is irrelevant. He should have intentionally excused himself from the review.
 
PCPer, in my opinion, should have done the following:
1. At the start of the review, state clearly, verbally (in video form) or in bold, impossible to miss text (in written form), that one of their employees worked on the White Paper, which was created by a company also owned by Ryan.
2. Allyn should have excused himself from the review, and another PCPer reviewer should have performed the review
 
Whether Allyn can remain objective isn't the question - as from an Ethics point of view, he should never put himself in a position where his objectivity and bias could be questioned to this degree.
 
You seem focused on the fact that "his review isn't wrong". That's not the point. The point is that a conflict of interest like that - especially one NOT DISCLOSED is most definitely unethical to begin with.

Is there a point to that whataboutism? Does it make it better that others haven't disclosed similar things?
 
Yet the testing and opinion were done by the same person. That is a conflict of interest. Why would you defend something like that?

This is a clearly crossing the line of ethical practice, at least in my view. I did remember the _Sync stuff and have noticed other odd practices but have viewed their reviews and content before.
I don't value PcPer as objective knowing this now.

Not in Online

getting GTA V load times down to 5 min mark :^)
 
well a 2-4 NVME raid would be useful for RAW 8k video editing. 

the ting goes skraaa 2+2 minus 1 is 3

The servers aren't the big story here, I think the change in platform is.

This means diddly jack if it's still running with a tickrate of less than 20 for most of the time.