Jump to content

FlappyBoobs

Member
  • Posts

    547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FlappyBoobs

  1. 7 minutes ago, Lingwendil said:

     

    Uh, no.

     

    Former cable internet/tv/phone installer, and current systems installation guy here.

     

    Anything a cable company provides still uses a modem. the usual recommendation is to use a separate modem and router for reliability, flexibility, and future expansion.

     

    DOCSIS is one of the largest protocols and is used by a huge amount of Cable providers for internet- Providers such as Time Warner, Cox, Comcast, etc. They all use a DOCSIS cable modem (or often modem/router combo if you lease the equipment from them). In a lot of markets ADSL (AT&T, for example)fiber is unreliable trash or still unavailable at modern accepted speeds, so you see very hot competition from cable providers.

     

    With Comcast, I use a standalone Arris SB6183 cable modem into a separate router and switch, that way I own my equipment and do not have a monthly lease/service fee, or need to be locked in to a providers wireless router arrangement and management.

    So you are still sending analog signals? 

  2. Modems don't really exist anymore, they are all routers. A modem is a MODulator DEModulater, and converts digital to analog and back again for sending data over the old analog phone lines. ADSL is using the excess capacity using a digital signal over those same copper lines, so unless you use dial up internet you don't use a modem.

  3. I don't know if it works on iPhone but i just connect my phone to windows via Bluetooth and get full screen mirroring on the PC. I can then setup alerts and features like auto lock and can attach a sound file to that action, so use that as an alert. 

  4. If you have to ask if somewhere is legit it most likely isn't fact is that unless they are an official reseller of licenses then it is not legit and you may as well pirate because that's what you will be doing if you use grey market keys anyway. (cheap keys usually come from bulk licensing deals that you are not a part of so effectively you are not licensed). If you don't want to pay the real price for the software license then don't use the software. MS offer online versions of the office suite for free, Libre office exists for people not wanting to pay for MS licenses.

     

    Just for clarity that website is apparently offering you the full 2021 pro plus license for 40 times less than MS charges....how legit do you think that is? I mean they are claiming a one time fee of a single monthly payment for office 365 for unlimited access to the software...it's bullshit.

  5. 2 laptops 1 cup...it's possible, but it doesn't take long to make it spew out complete shit.

     

    In other words there is software that will do what you want it to (actually a lot is built into windows due to surface tables having this feature OTB) but i have never seen it work flawlessly on anything but day 1 initial testing. Startup lag is an issue, but it's the things like changing where you are in a video or document that really grind on you to the point you end up never using it...and your no longer friendly CFO starts whining about wasted hardware purchases.

  6. For a start, you refer to your potential customers as "the local nerds" stop that. Next you bought multiple limited offers meaning that those same "local nerds" missed out on the deal. Lastly the "local nerds" know what they are buying and who they are buing from, they will not pay more than $20-$50 over what you paid for the parts because that's what most shops charge for assembly...without warranty.

     

    Either offer a warranty though a legit business you setup or suck up the fact that you didn't do your research before jumping in with both feet. Honestly it sounds like you have a bad attitude and I wouldn't want to buy from you because of that alone. Local nerds indeed.

  7. I moved country from the UK to Europe, and have had the same issue. But in my case I told my old bank what my new bank details were, so when people paid into my old account by mistake, even with a closed account they simply forwarded the money. By law they have to offer this service free of charge. But unless you already did that you are SOL.

     

    Your refund HAS to go to the card (account) that made the origional purchase, because that it what their terms and conditions say, it's also part of PCI DSS compliance, so you are not going to win any argument to do it another way. 

     

    The only option you have is to wait, and hope they will see that your transaction failed, then they will come up with a process of contacting you for a refund.

     

    Edir: I actually wrote that before reading the chat convo. But that's exsctly what you've been told. "If it does fail then wait for further instructions".

     

    You don't seem willing to fix your own mistake, and are expecting google to foot the bill for your own life choices. Don't get pissy with the guy trying to help you, listen to what they are telling you to do and do it. The options were contact your old bank to find out what they can do (they will tell you to wait for the email) or just wait for the email. That's it.

  8. It's a 4k TV with an α9 Gen5 AI processor, Dynamic Tone Mapping Pro
    Narrow bezel, Dolby Vision IQ with Precision Detail and Dolby Atmos. It's an OLED so has, Infinite Contrast, Dazzling darks, luminous lights
    With no backlight to dull their impact, Self-lit pixels can achieve the deepest blacks, for extreme contrast. Discover realistic images that reveal subtle, beautiful details you may previously have missed. 

  9. 8 minutes ago, Heats with Nvidia said:

    It totally is and there is the main problem. Who decides what is OK and what isn`t?  At least with a decentralized system there is the chance for some stability of that, and some influence for the people who use it, to decide that. With these centralized systems, they can change whatever they want, whenever they want it. So if anybody buys it, they rule. If they choose to delete all of it and switch the servers off, all is gone.

    Mastodon servers are setup by each person who wants to play moderator, it's like yahoo groups with the userbase paying for hosting.

  10. 32 minutes ago, Neroon said:

    Yeah I was thinking Starlink, surely that should work.

    Starlink isn't currently fully working. At the moment it is acting like a relay between an on shore base station and the dish. So it requires you to be stationary. It used to be locked to one static area, but you can get it for RVs in some countries. So it's improving.

     

     

    As for ships, you are currently limited to very close to shore locations, but once the satalites are all up and communicating with each other you'll be able to get it out in the middle of the Atlantic.

  11. The issue isn't the why, what or when it's the how. I am a software dev, when I create a game (for example) on windows i just fire up my chosen IDE, grab a few assets, build with my chosen engine and release my new game, with Windows and Linux I'm done, I sit back and wait for the scathing reviews and inevitable bankruptcy from trying to keep the servers up...now with apple, before I release I have to recompile my code for their platform, no biggie but wait I can't use my 100+ core build farm for it....I need a Mac to be part of the build process which slows things down a bit, I also have to pay apple for a licence for permission to have the option to publish to their platform, I have to consistently re-release to avoid being delisted and now apple is directly part of my build schedule because when they change something I have to react as they are constantly deprecating libraries that I may have used, breaking my game.

     

    The actual dollar cost of publishing to apple is negligible, but annoying that it is there, however the ongoing maintainance costs for developing for their platform is basically unsustainable for anyone but the biggest dev houses...and at that scale there just aren't enough gamers on mac to justify the cost.

  12. Your variable declaration is wrong. That is to say it's correct and you should never not do this, but if you want to see how fast your machine can fill it's memory you need to handle memory allocation yourself. So instead of declaring variables like you do, you need to use "dynamic allocation", which is basically stopping the complier from handling memory allocation and importantly de-allocation. 

     

    int *a = new int;

     

    Notice the asterisk infront of the variable, that marks it as dynamic memory, so you are responsible to clean it up. Whack that in an endless loop and a few seconds later your machine will grind to a halt. You can "release" the memory again using delete on the variable.

     

    delete a

     

    Play around with it in a loop, declare an array that uses more memory to fill faster, limit the loop to make it not crash etc. 

×