wANKER

No, for a variety of obvious reasons.
 
1) Password managers are intended for carrying passwords around with you, e.g. in an external drive, which is much more easily accessible than your personal computer. You don't want plain text passwords on that.
2) Passwords can be guessed or brute forced if they're not complex, again requiring no access to your personal computer.
3) The information guarded by those credentials is much more useful and manageable than snapshots of your face.
4) A password manager is actually a reasonably good (if temporary) countermeasure to keyloggers because it usually lets you copy and paste credentials without typing them.
 
There's no parallel here and your inability to see that says a lot on your understanding of these matters.

Not Apple's fault imo.
 
you know it's not their fault when they address it as soon as it happens

No 
 
I have to get the stress balls out anytime going near an O365 admin center. 
 

No 
 
I have to get the stress balls out anytime going near an O365 admin center. 
 

No 
 
I have to get the stress balls out anytime going near an O365 admin center. 
 

I'm sorry but Apple have insulted absolutely fookin' nobody here. 
 
 
Absolutely correct they're threatening them. They're threatening them on the basis that if they don't follow their guidelines, they will be removed. As any other company does.
 
Nor are Apple saying free developers contribute nothing. 
 
So basically what you're saying is Apple should open up iOS to allow anything to be sideloaded onto a device and publishers should be allowed to create their own app store and publish un-reviewed apps/whatever the hell they like? 
Yeh no. 

I'm sorry but Apple have insulted absolutely fookin' nobody here. 
 
 
Absolutely correct they're threatening them. They're threatening them on the basis that if they don't follow their guidelines, they will be removed. As any other company does.
 
Nor are Apple saying free developers contribute nothing. 
 
So basically what you're saying is Apple should open up iOS to allow anything to be sideloaded onto a device and publishers should be allowed to create their own app store and publish un-reviewed apps/whatever the hell they like? 
Yeh no. 

I'm kinda fed up with the 'common sense' bandwagon. 
 
I think most people will be surprised at how sophisticated malware is, and I think only an arrogant or delusional person would think their common sense could trump it. 
 
Regardless of how aware and cautious you think you are, you will still have done something as simple like plugging your USB Flash Drive into another system without thinking about it 

I'm sorry but Apple have insulted absolutely fookin' nobody here. 
 
 
Absolutely correct they're threatening them. They're threatening them on the basis that if they don't follow their guidelines, they will be removed. As any other company does.
 
Nor are Apple saying free developers contribute nothing. 
 
So basically what you're saying is Apple should open up iOS to allow anything to be sideloaded onto a device and publishers should be allowed to create their own app store and publish un-reviewed apps/whatever the hell they like? 
Yeh no. 

I'm sorry but Apple have insulted absolutely fookin' nobody here. 
 
 
Absolutely correct they're threatening them. They're threatening them on the basis that if they don't follow their guidelines, they will be removed. As any other company does.
 
Nor are Apple saying free developers contribute nothing. 
 
So basically what you're saying is Apple should open up iOS to allow anything to be sideloaded onto a device and publishers should be allowed to create their own app store and publish un-reviewed apps/whatever the hell they like? 
Yeh no. 

I'm sorry but Apple have insulted absolutely fookin' nobody here. 
 
 
Absolutely correct they're threatening them. They're threatening them on the basis that if they don't follow their guidelines, they will be removed. As any other company does.
 
Nor are Apple saying free developers contribute nothing. 
 
So basically what you're saying is Apple should open up iOS to allow anything to be sideloaded onto a device and publishers should be allowed to create their own app store and publish un-reviewed apps/whatever the hell they like? 
Yeh no. 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved. 
 

Oh hell no! Cisco will never lower its prices. Why should they? IMHO, only a fool buys Cisco for the SMB (Small Medium Business) market. Fortune 500 and ISP market is another thing.
 
It's not that Cisco equipment is bad, quite the contrary. But it is way over valued for what it is. No, what you're paying for with Cisco is the knowledge and support levels they offer. If that's what you want, then perhaps it works out. But the fact Cisco is successful is because such a market exist.
 
And yes, there are other alternatives. Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, Juniper Networks, etc. The market for Next Generation Firewalls and other networking equipment is pretty extensive.

So, in short, a third party seller changed their product images/titles/descriptions or w/e to include racist language? 
After which Amazon removed it? 
 
IMO it's news articles like this which are just adding fuel to the fire. 
Making it look as if Amazon have played some part in racist propaganda - when in reality it was just some piece of shit looking to kick something off , which they have achieved.