Jump to content

bbbbbbb99

Member
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Funny
    bbbbbbb99 got a reaction from ZacoAttaco in Microsoft's next gen Xbox consoles are codename "Anaconda" and "Lockhart"   
    They went from xbox "the first one" to 360 to 1 to 1 with suffixes. Tbh anything could be the next name, im hoping they go in the 360 direction but go with 69
  2. Agree
    bbbbbbb99 reacted to aezakmi in Someone hacked printers to advertise for Pewdiepie   
    dunno who you are but that avatar is god tier
     

     
     
     
  3. Like
    bbbbbbb99 reacted to AlTech in Proton, Valve's rumoured "Linux compatibility" tool has been released into the Steam client!   
    Nice .
     
    If this expands to most games on Steam then I could seriously see myself switching 100% over to linux on Desktop.
  4. Agree
    bbbbbbb99 got a reaction from Technous285 in Apple fined for misleading customers with faulty iPhones and iPads   
    Many people appear here and all over the internet are of the opinion once someone opens your phone that isnt apple and replaces the screen, for instance, apple suddenly loses all responsibility for any faliure of the device whether or not it was related to the repair due there being another possible person who could have created the issue and by vertue apple is immune to any repicussions related to the faliure of the device even if apple caused it. This is the last person to touch it is the only one who can be at fault rule i suppose. The australian consumer law might be interesting to you because it was set up and backed up by cases before apple started to try moving goal posts.
     
    The basics of it are:
     
    -If you say you do something and it doesnt happen, make it happen or in trouble (time frames, what is and isnt reasonable then come into play). 
     
    -for the lifetime (resonable appears again, 10 year old iphone vs 1 year old iphone kind of logic applies when thinking resonable not 23 vs 24 months) of the product the company is responsible if a faliure arises due to resonable use (so putting phone in pocket alot cause touch disease is apples fault but dropping phone on concrete isnt).
     
    This is where i guess it will be weird for those with the "the last person to touch it is the only one who can be at fault rule" position as these apply to all parties in the original post scenario, apple and the repair shop and all of this appears logical when focusing on an individual phone 
     
    Person buys iphone, person drops iphone, iphone is broken but since the person broke it in an unresonable use of the phone (hitting ground at high velocity), person is responsible for repair and gets it repaired,(ACL makes it very clear who repairs it doesnt matter because if something is broken due to faulty repairs because they advertise "make phone work" if they give phone back that dont work it's their problem not apple), phone works again, apple release update, apple update breaks phone, apple responsiblity is verified, apple in deep shit because something purchased called an iphone doesnt iphone and it was apple's fault.
     
    The Australian make sure everyone plays nice website goes into more details and with less iphone related examples. 
    https://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/consumer-rights-guarantees/repair-replace-refund?gclid=CjwKCAjw06LZBRBNEiwA2vgMVZBAJjGmNt1uE1gUj1LGvzo384-eUfKcCF29MTWwt7OKZLlxL09pyBoCtU0QAvD_BwE
×