-
Posts
2,839 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Status Updates
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Store Home
Posts posted by totjup5
-
-
59 minutes ago, ZaneiusValentine said:
So on the 7th I will officially have 2 GTX 1080s, now I haven't had any Nvidia cards since the 8800s, so what's there to really know about what I can do with them now? New software and the like, and are there any driver issues I should be aware of with the 1080?
As far as driver issues I have two gtx 1080s, and specifically in Rise of the tomb raider enabling VXAO causes the driver to crash. Fairly small issue since it's only in one game, but that's all i could think of.
-
One of my 1080s is EVGA, and the other is ASUS. As long as it's the same gpu you'll be fine.
-
Look at the graphics score, a 19000 is about right for a 1070. the overall score is brought down by your cpu.
-
2 hours ago, Majestic said:
BUT ITS ONLY IN ONE GAME GAISE
TESTING 4K IS NOT REALISTIC
NVIDIA CARDS ALSO DO IT (they dont)
STRESSING THE 8GB ISN"T REALISTIC
Oh man, the amount of mental gymnastics taking place in the youtube comment sections is staggering.
Actually, the GTX 960 did do this at launch...
-
Sorry, but I'm calling bullshit on this. The 960 did the same thing at launch and no one went crazy about it. Also, any card will exceed 75w through the pcue slot if you overclocked it. Pure bullshit just stacking on top of the minor issue that people have blown out of proportion.
-
At this point i'd go for the 1070. it won't perform quite as well when SLI scaling is perfect but it will be far more consistent, and it will likely get better driver support for longer. And that's coming from someone who ran 970s in SLI for the last year and a half.
- MeesterJackson and mouf
- 2
-
2 hours ago, Dan Castellaneta said:
I really don't understand why it's selling as well as it is. I genuinely don't understand paying an early adopter's fee for the GTX 980's successor.
Say what you will, but I bought 2. they're on their way now.
-
as many as go on sale and look fun i guess?
-
If i were you i'd wait for the rx 480 and get an i5 4460 with it. That should come out to around the same price.
-
On 6/19/2016 at 2:18 AM, AluminiumTech said:
Excuse me??????!!!!!!!!
Posting anything from feminist frequency on here should be a bannable offence.
-
-
I'm on a single 970 right now while I wait for 1080s to come in stock and my overclocked 970 manages 70-90 fps at 1440p so a single 1080 should have no issues. also, I had no issues averaging in the 130fps range when I had 970 SLI.
-
4 hours ago, Noire said:
Install a Steam skin.
Steam skins aren't real
-
I really like the fractal venturi fans. they're super quiet under load.
-
That is the stupidest thing i've ever seen....
-
Good. I like PGA better.
-
25 minutes ago, fwright18 said:
That was my thinking too. This is really unfortunate for me. Is there any way to preorder it and have it guaranteed? Otherwise is the only option to try and load the site on release and get it within the first couple of minutes?
Not that I'm aware of unfortunately.
-
It will probably sell out faster honestly because there's generally more demand for cheaper cards.
-
On 5/29/2016 at 2:28 AM, KearneyMC said:
Nvidia and AMD people with 970 and 390 8gb's are struggling to get over 100fps
If I disable SLI I get 70-90 fps with max settings at 1440p on one 970. That is overclocked, but still, the game is well optimized.
-
I've had very few issues with SLI and i've been running it for years. the 970s that I have now are the third SLI setup I've had in a row. Also, the benefit of 2 cards is when the new ones come out, you can sell one card at a time; one before you get the new gpus, and one after. That way you still have a functional pc in the mean time. That's what I'm doing now for my upgrade to gtx 1080 SLI.
-
I like my DxRacer chair for the most part but as a tall 6'3" large guy with broad shoulders it is a bit small for me.
-
The Witcher 3. Probably the best single player game I've ever played, and it's definitely one of my favorite games ever.
-
3 hours ago, antonrr90 said:
I'm running a i7-3770K at BClock:100.6 CPUVoltage:1.125V, Multiplier:45 (4526MHz) and at load, only pulling 69C. My Extreme OC on the 3770K, BC:101.2, CPUVoltage as 1.33, multiplier of 48, (4828MHz) which under load was just tipping 79C (IntelBurn Test), and that is only being cooled with the old H100i liquid cooler. And my Extreme OC I use daily, and my temp logging rarely hits the 70sC. Not sure if my 3770K was just a good one, because I have only found a few that have achieved these levels and not burnt out the CPU. I have been running on my 3770K for 2 1/2 years, and it has been competitive in performance, as CPU advances really haven't moved that far in comparing Quad Core Processors. When I ran Cinebench, I also had Firefox, HWMonitor, Gimp, Blender(2.77a), and I still got a 786. (Update, second image is Cinebench with nothing else running)
I managed to get mine to 4.8 on my h110, Technichally I can hit 4.9 on it but the voltage required and the temps are a bit above what i'm comfortable with. With a heavy overclock the 3770k is still a really great chip, mine has had no troubles keeping up in games!
-
1 hour ago, SpaceTurtle917 said:
I play battlefield 4 in ultra settings in 1440p 60fps with my gtx 970. 1440p isn't too demanding.
There are games out there much more demanding than Battlefield 4. For example in witcher 3 maxed out with hairworks I can just barely make 60fps with two heavily overclocked 970s at 1440p.
So I've finally got them on the way.
in Graphics Cards
Posted
Just a warning too, certain huge open areas of the game will still have framerate drops due to horrible cpu optimization. Specifically the area that gave me issues is geothermal valley.