Maverick262001

6 hours ago, rice guru said:

But if you are really worried look into getting something with a pixart sensor or a hero sensor they are the market leaders sensor wise and I know the gpro not the wireless one should have the sensor and should cost about the same.

I just want a gaming mouse with good enough sensor, bang for buck and useful in gaming lying between casual and professional ! The shape and weight feels alright. So is the G402 the right choice ?

Also the price difference between G102 and G402 is mere 10$. So another question is that price to performance ratio is good on G402 or not?

On 5/13/2019 at 7:06 AM, Hiya! said:

It does since it's more recent but G402 has more button and the sensor aren't something to worried about unless you are a hardcore fps player

So I have not wasted my money on Hyperion Fury, right?

I heard from my friend that the newer G102 has better sensor than G402 Hyperion Fury. Is it true? What mice should I go with? Budget not to be considered between these two.

3 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

just get the 1660, not all that different in performance to the 1660ti, but cheaper by a good amount

 

As for CPU bottleneck, you'll get a lot in Assassin's Creed games, but not as much as memory bottleneck. Crew 2 and Anthem I dont know, but other games are fine for 60fps. Higher and you might still get bottleneck, though I'm not sure how high.

The price difference in some brands is not even 10$

24 minutes ago, gbergeron said:

nothing to worry about here, good buy, have fun, enjoy, good match cpu/gpu

 

Only thing you should consider is to go 2x8gb ram

 

 

 

cheeeers

Alright... I'll upgrade my RAM !

Specs:

i5 4440S 2.8 GHz

2x4 GB DDR3 1333 MHz RAM

GTX 1660Ti

Now I'm thinking to buy the 1660Ti for 1080p gaming...my question is what are the chances of CPU bottleneck and by how much?

Games to be considered:

Shadow of the tomb raider

PUBG

Crew 2

Rainbow Six Siege

Anthem

AC Unity and Odyssey

4 hours ago, Jurrunio said:

I didn't even consider 4000 CL19 as doable with 4 sticks, I'm thinking 4000 CL22

 

3600MHz probably. The best SPD that you can run with confidence will be 3466MHz CL16 or 3600MHz CL16.

So yeah Corsair vengeance pro RGB (3600Mhz) is the best option, right?

1 minute ago, porina said:

The problem is any speed above that supported by the CPU is a kinda overclock, even if the ram makers say they can do it. In my experience which doesn't go as far as 4000 (yet) some mobo/ram combos just don't like each other. There may be some CPU dependency too at the extreme end, not forgetting mobo bios also contributes. Also running 2 sticks per channel over 1 stick per channel will increase the loading. There's a load of variables.

 

The play it safe version would be to get 3200 Samsung B-die as that pretty much works with anything, and usually overclocks well above that. You'll probably be ok with any modern 3200 kit. By modern, let's say released since Coffee Lake as I've heard they altered some sub-timings to help compatibility compared to modules released for previous CPUs.

Alright brother...thank you so much.. I'm gonna buy Corsair RGB ones (3200) kit

3 minutes ago, porina said:

Many 4000 kits are CL19, which is equivalent in latency to 3200C15, so it's not actually bad, plus you get the benefit from both having dual rank per channel on top of the increased bandwidth. If you use a bandwidth sensitive application, it would help.

 

However, I'd hate to imagine the chances of success at running 4 modules at 4000. I've never tried but it does seem rather hit and miss if a particular board/CPU combo will go that high. So if you really need more ram bandwidth, X299 is the more obvious choice.

So how high I can go with four modules and same memory config ?(100% accuracy)(no hit or miss thing)

3000?

3200?

29 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

With utter garbage timings (and hence low performance) and a T-topology board like the Gigabyte Aorus Master, yes

Didn't get you brother... could you say in a more simpler and elaborated way

Is it possible to use 4x8 RAM ...all memory chips running at 4000 Mhz on an i7 9700k system ?

40 minutes ago, RGB Toilet said:

okay well like @Snipergod87said it would be false advertising if they said it on the website and then not having it. Also I am sure you can find retail stores in your area and ask about it and if all that doesnt work then maybe give them a call?

Alright I'll try

2 hours ago, RGB Toilet said:

quick question what made you think it did not come with the eye tracking?

Because there are special retail versions like XB271HUT for eye tracking built-in.

4 minutes ago, RGB Toilet said:

0:20 "comes with the tobii eye tracker built in"  im just taking his word for it but there u go(?)

I can't find a single video for Indian variant testing of eye tracking...so still confused.

1 minute ago, Skiiwee29 said:

no, 2 people can have the same problems and choices, but the answers you are looking for are in there and really didnt require a new post about the same product for the same use scenario in my opinion. 

But I didn't check that post.... just wanted my own answers... I'll wait for a while to get some advice..and thnx for spoiling this post

7 minutes ago, Skiiwee29 said:

this exact question was just asked 15 minutes ago...

 

 

So wut....2 people can't have same problems and same laptop choices... typical of you !

Hi guys.. I have decided to take a computer science course for my college and I need a laptop to support my projects including cybersecurity purposes..so considering future proof hardware and not too high end specs will this one be the perfect choice for me 
https ://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B07BDFLRKF/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1524648161&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=2018+Dell+Flagship+Inspiron+15+Gaming+Laptop%2C+15.6%E2%80%9D+FHD+Anti-Glare+LED-Backlit+Display%2C+Intel+Core+i7-7700HQ+%28Up+to+3.8GHz%29%2C+NVIDIA+GeForce+GTX+1050%2C+16GB+DDR4+SDRAM%2C+1TB+HDD+%2B+128GB+SSD%2C+Win+10&dpPl=1&dpID=51jr8WJSefL&ref=plSrch

Or should I step down a bit and save a few bucks ?
Note: Pls do consider future internships workloads.

36 minutes ago, AayushSharma64 said:

8600k. Trident z 16 gb. Rm 750x psu. 

Try rechecking every led connection to your motherboard and your pc case. Further check this video out to get your doubts cleared

10 minutes ago, Eibe said:

You have already seen it yourself a month ago as you commented on this video:

Unfortunately you will have an almost unplayable performance. You would be almost be better off by running it off the iGPU of the CPU than the GT 610.

That card was meant as a replacement for integrated graphics for systems with CPUs that do not have them but still do not need to do any graphical demanding tasks.

I am afraid that no one is going to tell you that you would do even near ok with that GPU.

How did you get me over the PUBG video, even I don't remember it...lol

1. GTX 1070 would be a nice choice over GTX 1060 if you intend 50% load for gaming and 50% for rendering and editing.

2. Z270 coffee lake compatibility depends on the mobo manufacturer and their bios updates... I would recommend using Z370 mobo to be confident and be sure about the experience.

3. Yes it is(Ryzen 2600)

4. i5 8400 is advisable over other CPUs including the 8600k because the difference will not be significant as well you could buy a better GPU like the 1070 for better bang for the buck.

Hope it would clear your doubts.. peace out.

Just now, Snapperx said:

You already posted it like an hour ago.

I know but the specs were uploaded afterwards and the answers weren't quite satisfactory...so another try

How much avg fps I would receive on each of the following games at medium low settings at 1360*768 resolution ?

1. Call of duty advanced warfare

2. Call of duty black ops 2

3. NFS rivals

4. Assassin's creed unity

5. GTA V

6. PUBG

7. Call of duty ghosts

Etc etc other AAA games

Note: Pls try saying individual fps for respective games

My pc specs : i5 4440S 2.8 GHz stock 3.3 GHz boost, 4 GB DDR3 1333 MHz, GT 610 2 GB DDR3 GPU overclocked to 900 MHz on core clock and 590 MHz on memory clock.

21 minutes ago, dizmo said:

I'd go with the first one. The more powerful GPU will have more weight than the better CPU in the second build.

You can also upgrade it for drastically less than the other system; DDR3 can generally be found quite cheap, and an i7 from that era should be quite cheap as well. Really, if you're playing at 1080p60, the first build is likely going to give you a better experience.

 

Welcome to the forum!

 

8GB of RAM is fine. It only becomes an issue if he is streaming while gaming and has a bunch of other apps open at the same time, which honestly if he's looking to buy those systems is unlikely.

Eh, they're about the same....or, you can upgrade to a 4690k, 4790k, etc for much less than it'd cost to upgrade a newer CPU.

The performance is about the same with a one or two generation gap once you factor in overclocking.

 

Thanks bruh, I'll stick to my system then and yes you were right, no ideas of streaming even in near future ^v^

1 minute ago, Himommies said:

Are you in the US?What's your budget?.There's almost guaranteed to be a better option

No I'm not, secondly I'm just comparing and planning, I already have system 1.