Jump to content

bugsy51

Member
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

bugsy51's Achievements

  1. Everyone telling you not to do it because it could lower your framerate? Okay...but... you aren't even asking what hardware you have or settings you play at so how would they know? With my 1080ti I can play wolfenstein II New Collosus at 3620X2036 (2x 1440p) supersampled and still get 120 fps average, 80 fps minimum. In fact, I have to play some games (Divinity 2, Borderlands 2 etc..) at 2x 1440p because if I don't it'll go max fps and cause screen tearing for some games at 144hz even WITH gsync enabled. However if I tried that with Assassins Creed Origin then what's gonna happen? Im gonna get 40 fps if I'm lucky and hate life. If it makes the picture at all smoother or more appealing to the eye than why would it matter if it cuts the framerate down to another acceptable framerate?
  2. To be honest duck I don't think you really thought that through. Basically your saying (without actually saying it) that the fancy setup you have currently gives you 144 fps so it makes sense to have that monitor. So in a year or two when system reuirments shoot up and your average fps in games is down to 100, that your monitor is no longer beneficial and you should maybe trade it in for a monitor with a 100hz refresh? And then when you upgrade your hardware, you will trade int he 100hz for a 144 hz or a 240 hz? Bottom line is higher refresh rate is smoother and easier on the eyes no matter how many fps you get. Let's not forget the sole reason we seek out higher refresh rates in the first place and it has nothing to do with fps.. its about how often the screen refreshes ands how smooth the your games look with higher refresh. Point is fps is variable and I do not believe that youa re getting 144 fps on withcer 3 with hairworks and erverything else on ultra. I detect more passive pc snobbery than helpful info in your reply.
×