Jump to content

RedAV8R

Member
  • Posts

    141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Profile Information

  • Occupation
    Electrician

System

  • CPU
    Intel Core i7 4790K
  • Motherboard
    ASRock Z97E-ITX/AC
  • RAM
    16GB (2x8GB) GSkill Sniper DDR3 1866
  • GPU
    EVGA Geforce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
  • Case
    Fractal Design Node 804
  • Storage
    Samsung EVO 850 500GB, WD Black 1TB x2
  • PSU
    EVGA SuperNova 750 P2
  • Display(s)
    ASUS VG248QE 24" x2
  • Cooling
    Noctua NH-U12S
  • Keyboard
    Corsair K70 RGB LED - Cherry Red
  • Mouse
    Logitech G500s
  • Operating System
    Windows 10

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It's a one-off custom design. Not available to the public.
  2. I recall an earlier video basically swearing to only use Intel 10Gb NICs. The OWC being used is Marvell. Any particular reason besides it being 1x PCIe?
  3. Oh god, not this AR/AK pecker measuring again. The AK series of rifles are a perfect cheap rifle built for a conscript army with minimal training. They did good job for what they needed. As for reliability. Meh. Each has advantages and disadvantages, but you aren't going to find a 'winner'. Hey I know. Glock or 1911. HAHAHA.
  4. And maybe I should have qualified my recommendation. Sure Apex has the replacement trigger, but the real meat and potatoes is the spring/sear kit that does way more for the pull than the trigger itself, and still be used with factory trigger.
  5. I do truly understand that sentiment, but a trigger pack on an M&P is no different than say a trigger pack for an AR. Sure some suck, but just because it's 'mil-spec' doesn't mean that you're guaranteed no FTF.
  6. Apex has a trigger kits for the Shield and other M&P series pistols. They do add quite a bit, aren't cheap relative to the cost of the pistol, but hot dog they are nice.
  7. @knightslugger Um... No a senator can not be removed willy nilly. Even originally written senators were elected for 6 years. Removal of which is governed by Section 5 of Article I. Sorry all i hear is whining because the state is predominately republican while you have a dem for senator. and if it were the way it was 100 years ago that R legislature could ensure a R senator. With that.. Eh I can see more one term senators, (I'd be much more supportive of term limits for congress). Less special interest lobbying, less money, etc. But as for states rights being enhanced, eh, still not seeing it work as you describe. I'm not saying I wouldn't be supportive of a repeal of the 17th, there really is no need for it, but I can see those not in favor as seeing it as more a gerrymandering than anything. I've seen exactly one rep of mine actually have any sort of common sense, while he has an R behind him, much more of a L in practice. Unfortunately i'm moving here into a new district and I need to do some research. I don't believe much of any elected official actually reps their respective state unless it comes to money for jobs at the taxpayers teet. This officials lobbying for funds for gross spending on money pits like the F-35 and the SLS. So yeah they are repping their state, but not for the betterment of the country. If so those costly programs should have been killed YEARS ago. Sorry rambling. Hell I feel the pain. We've got a new D governor while thankfully a super R majority in both state house and senate. So she can pound sand for 4 years all she wants.
  8. You are still failing to justify how a mob rule people elected state legislature then electing senators is so fantastically different than the mob rule people directly electing the senators themselves. The concept of the Senate (2 per state) regardless of population still keeps things 'equal'.
  9. As originally written, the Senate was filled by state legislature, which in turn is elected by the people... I guess I'm not seeing any sort of balance of power shifted by getting rid of the middle man. I mean I'm open to ideas, but I don't see any major upset here. I mean feel free to continue on. I'm all ears. I guess of all the Constitution, the 17th wasn't even really on my radar for being repealed. I mean the Senate still holds valuable identity for two houses even if being directly elected. One where simply population control determines leanings and the senate where states do matter.
  10. Exactly, any arm the government has, the people should have easy access too. The need for designers to go out of their way to design a firearm so that it can't be modified for automatic fire is a sham.
  11. I know why they weren't grandfathered, that's exactly what i'm saying. Because they can't, or rather won't because to exempt the stocks would again be rewriting law but way more obvious than what they are already doing. The federal government is already violating their own law by attempting to classify them as machineguns, so what is some more violation. And yes, the slope that if this is allowed will set things back and likely never go back until the revolution. Take guns away, or magazines, or whatever and then just the most recent ruling, which I called when it happened. We want the police to protect us, but they have to duty to protect people. Even when forced to be disarmed.
  12. And nobody gave 2c about them until ONE person decided to use it for evil purposes. No sorry. That's not how it works. You keep mentioning a persons trigger finger... that doesn't matter. That's not the law. The fact that the ATF is rewriting the law can not happen. If they want this done. Then do it the right way with legislation. The fact that a legal object is suddenly illegal and force people to throw away hundreds of dollars is ex post facto. The only way I'd remotely support this action would be exempting them from the '86 ban and making them fully transferable.
×