Jump to content

LukaP

Member
  • Posts

    6,512
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LukaP

  1. LukaP

    Off Topic Chit Chat

    seeing you still here, yes, sadly i am
  2. Gone a year and still among the top shitposters. SMH people

    1.   Show previous replies  60 more
    2. givingtnt

      givingtnt

      what do you want us to lie ?

      this is the internet ! nobody ever lies !

    3. Tech_Dreamer
    4. Crowes

      Crowes

      One shitpost to rule them all!

  3. LukaP

    Off Topic Chit Chat

    Guess which sad bastard is kinda back now that uni is finishing up
  4. LukaP

    Hello

    hi
  5. Well even for a giant like intel, it would be completely unprofitable to try to bin higher corecounts for this. Even so id imagine this would be the big 8-12 core die, with most cores turned off and only those that can achieve 5.1 are turned off. And the best compromise was 4 cores it seems
  6. WCCF >.> Transactional applications are an example of a frequency dependent workload. There are probably some other single threaded workloads in enterprise im not aware of, but that is one off the top of my head
  7. it would if it could get to the copper blocks. i have no idea how you would push it down the pipes though, given its solid
  8. Gallium has a melting point of 34C iirc. It would stay solid since coolant temperature is in the 20s assuming your room temperature is 22-25c as well. not really a very good liquid coolant then
  9. Because we love you, and id gladly donate now that i can
  10. well i hate the fact we have E7s as they are super expensive and not the best when it comes to memory bandwith. ive been lobying for Power8 all the time, but people there are used to x86 so oh well Meh students should be required to have their own laptops. its not like they need the power of an i5... they could all live with an ultrabook for the stuff theyre working on...
  11. ill be glad to check it out ^^ oh fancy pantsies. we get i5 45XXs in classrooms. Though in our lab we have E7v3s
  12. depends on what level of buffering its set to. usually AVsync will limit to 60 if higher or leave it alone if lower, but it could be set to limit to 30 try disabling it
  13. Do you have any sources on this? Because in my experience, algorithmically identical Java code will run from 1/4 to 1/8 the speed of C++... Granted i didnt do HPC with super optimised compilers, but more like low power apps and utilities but it ran at those speeds. Especially memory intensive tasks were slow as balls
  14. do you have Vsync on, or are artificially limiting FPS over geforce experience?
  15. @AlexGoesHigh disagrees. unless he is secretly a woman You just gotta be in real deap shit, and terry aint... sorry terry
  16. How about someone who tries to spread knowledge to other forum users
  17. Well idk the SoC guys are doing pretty great keeping the performance high enough to be able to support this high level language. So why move from it. Yes its ugly, Yes its slow, but developers know it well by now, so its really useless to try and change it. Also, if youre writing an android game in Java youre doing it wrong. C++ is the way for that
  18. Given my lack of SSD on the workstation this would be really handy to reduce the waiting times on them programs :3
  19. i have too much of both, while at the same time not having enough of either.
  20. ARE YOU COMPLAINING? dont forget alex gaskhart and patrick stump :3
  21. This is amazing. The reverse is also cool #poppunkmasterrace
  22. Everyone actually knows why the AMD chips "run cooler". They measure the temp at the junction (pins), not inside the cores, and then send that number into some equation. the actual temps of the silicon are very similar between intel and AMD, no matter the process.
  23. whoops, yeah its that. makes sense yeah...
×