LukaP
-
Posts
6,512 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Status Updates
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Store Home
Everything posted by LukaP
-
then fuck off, fat fuck face
-
die of hunger cesrai.
-
cant, busy month at work, literally impossible to take vacation due to deadlines to meet. Tocsin, i have a bed already, but nevertheless "Awwwwhhhh thank you cutiepie :3"
-
depending on the accuracy you need, you either need to put in (as an answer) log389 or whatever the calculator throws up for that though
-
eh, its a comedy thread, serving a comedic nature. weve made fun of worse here... -.- mods having sticks up their behinds tonight again :'D (jk i love you mods... (apart from @alpenwasser i dont like you :wub: ))
-
ill get the wireless stuff in time, im sure, WiUSB is a thing. id love for someone to clean my fapkins for me though
-
eh im just stating the most likely candidate (since they have been experimenting with it the most, as has everyone else). Im pretty sure its a stop gap solution anyway, until graphite gets perfected
-
i still dont get the vote for turnip thing? i thought it was a wan show linus charade, but what the hell is it?
-
clean the stuff, mention it to them, ask them if it can be avoidedif it doesnt work and they still do it, ignore them and clean it, if theyre assholes like that, they thrive on attention and will soon stop
-
yes of course practically its impossible. but in theory you can make it work. well intel is plannign to move to SiliconGermaniumArsenic (iirc) semiconductor process by 7nm anyway, so i personally have no idea how that will work. also when you dope it, it adds more complexity.. etc...
-
Removal of abstraction layers in graphics rendering is missing the point
LukaP replied to linuxfan66's topic in Off Topic
no raytracing, no dynamic shadows, no particles, no textures apart from albedo, no effects. -
(transistors are nanotech) We will be unable to make them smaller when every feature scales down to 1 atom thickness. but that is dependent on materials used. For silicon, the gate can get down to ~110pm which is 0.1nm. But we will obviously use different materials by then, so that can change (of course this is just off the top of my head, im pretty sure you need to scale gates and drains similarly, as well as the interconnects between them, to maintain coherence, so there are more factors)
-
Removal of abstraction layers in graphics rendering is missing the point
LukaP replied to linuxfan66's topic in Off Topic
They still are. very much so. DX12 is not really low level at all. You are still higher than CUDA, higher than C++ on CPUs. Its just that DX11 was such an enormous load of crap that they desperatly needed to cut it up a little, and are now calling it low level. Dont worry its ok. -
It features Corsair Xclusive Cherry MX RGB switches on the controller (hence the Xorsair) and the entire chassis of the unit lights up in RGB, with 300ppi screens instead of metal panels for all dat bling dawg
-
Wait up, XorsairStation U 720 RGB, coming soon
-
I care Thanks
-
How can i be a fanboy of myself? I could be a fangirl though
-
@SeriouslyMikey's signature has a good one
-
https://soundcloud.com/dauthi-slayer my good friends soundcloud. maybe youll like something
-
- 60 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- linus
- weight lifting
- (and 2 more)
-
GrimNeo next week.
- 60 replies
-
- 10
-
-
- linus
- weight lifting
- (and 2 more)
-
Age is just a number, and prison cell is just a room. -Arctic Monkeys
-
TSMC/Samsung/GloFo 14nm FF is not the same as Intels 14nm TG. the density compares more to Ivy bridge's 22nm TG. I reckon with 14/16nm FF+ TSMC can get a little under Haswell's 22nm TG density
-
yes of course, but those irradiating ones dont perform fission/fusion, but rather scatter radioactive material over an area. Fussion/fission (if all the material fuses/decays) leaves no radioactive waste (with the correct isotopes used)
