Jump to content

Arjmaj

Member
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Arjmaj's Achievements

  1. Yes. This is the bike Im not using it for dirt roads or sand or to do stupid things. The thing here has to do with insecurity. I want to change the relation of the transmition to the wheel (chain and the other two, i dont know its names in english) to have more final speed, but maintaining the same acceleration. I feel you, all my bikes are repaired "in house". My car goes to the mechanic shop, i dont know jack about cars, but bikes? Im not mechanic but i can repair my own bikes, and if i dont know, "san google has all the answers". I remember my firsr 110cc, it was used, generic brand. I was able to make that piece of machine run at 140km/h (87mp/h). After the third piston, connecting rod and cylinder i rolled it back to stock and sold it. But all that was when i was a teenager and now i cant spare copious amounts of money testing and trying, i have a family to feed
  2. Yes, it depends on the licence. I have mine for about 8 years now and i can drive up to 150cc. I never tried to upgrade it. Being honest, any motorcycle above 150cc cost too much, even used ones. For example, the Benelli TNT 300cc new cost today arround 1 million, thats arround 6200 us dollars, and used ones even models of 2018 with 50k km arround 600K to 700K. Keep in mind, new ones here about 50% of the price is only taxes (argentina being argentina i guess). As for the fans and airflow, thats why it will be an interesting proyect. As for the jets on the carburetor, you only need to change the high jet (the one for high rpm, the jet for low rpms doesnt need to be changed, its mainly function its to provide fuel from 800rpms to about 2000rpms). It will be fun to watch if its possible. Even 1hp more will be a huge gain in a 150cc engine.
  3. First, enflish not my first language, sorry for misspelling and formar errors. Right now im buying a "corven triax 150cc" and i was wondering, ¿can you "turbocharge" that engine with a blowymatron?. In my country (argentina) theres not a lot of places to "dyno" a car, less a motorcycle. The place that does that is 250km of where i live, so zero chances, but it will be a good proyect to see if it can be done or if it will yield any increase (or decrease) in power. Also, those coolers are extremely rare and if you can source one (i already checked), it will cost arround 30k (at conversion rates it will be arround 150 us dollars) and no less than 30 days to arrive. It will be cool to se someone trying this.
  4. Well... my browser is in entirely spanish, if i install the english version for correct grammar (i tried one time) it would mess up everything (typing in spanish will cause auto-corrects to english and vice-versa). And right now is 4.17 AM sooo... im going to bed right now. Maybe try something else tomorrow with this. I see it coming from miles, but... average wage here is 25K per month, 1 US dollar will be 50 bucks here... doing the math, it's more or less 500 US dollars per month... the ATI RX560 4GB cost arround 15K here, arround 300 US dollars... i save a year to build this pc. I don't have the money to spare for a graphics card... between the taxes (because my country really like taxes on everything), the money for the rent, services (electricity, gas, ABL (-Alumbrado, Barrido y Limpieza- "street lights, swept and cleaning", no one does that and street lights broke and no one repairs it, but you still have to pay it, because my country), water bills, and more), food, clothing, etc., i have no means to buy a card... this pc cost me so much, putting in US dollars, this pc, here, cost arround 3000K. Sorry for this taking too long, but the point is, buying a dedicated graphics card is out of question, nope, or else i need to eat rice for the next 4 months to be able to save enough, and with the enconomy here, when i get the money, probably it will cost me another 2 months of savings.
  5. Well, first, english is not my first language so apologys for mi typing. Tight your seatbelts because this is LONG (and i have no idea how to condense more, as i said, its not my first languange, and i learned alone). I have a problem with mi bios, or S.O, idk. I bought my "low budget gaming" pc. It has 2x8GB of DDR4 2400Mhz (stock, for now), my Ryzen 5 2400G, 240GB of M.2 storage and a single HDD (rescued from an old notebook, 320GB). Power supply 650 Watts 80 Plus Silver (i don't remember the brand, but is full modular). The motherboard is the Gigabyte AB350 Gaming 3 (with the lastest bios F31). I bought the X4 Foundations, and with the out of the box configurations in my bios the game doesn't lauch. Nope, nothing. I went to the "chipset" options in the bios, all was set to automatic, and putting only 1GB of "dedicated" Vram. I changed the "automatic" option and set to "force" the integrated GPU, new options, great. Set the "UMA Mode" from "Automatic" to "UMA Fixed", new option, at this point, AMAZING (new technology to me, so i was a little scared and not sure what to do really). Set the "Frame Buffer Size to "2G"" (it ranges from "64MB" to "16G", i assume is GB). GREAT, the game is playable.... until.... CTD after more or less 1 hour of playing it. Game reported "not enough memory available". I went to the "dxdiag" and see 2GB of Vram, and nearly 8GB of shared memory. After diving in the rabbithole turns out that the game is forbid to use the shared memory as per the devs. OOOOKAY... go to the bios, changed "2G" to "4G" in the "Frame Buffer Size" (minimum for the game from the posted specs is 3GB of Vram), save and exit. Windows start, i go straight to the game, half our later, CTD AGAIN!. At this point i'm fuming. Go to "dxdiag" again. WHAT?, 2GB of "dedicated Vram", same as before, same shared memory and everything. Go to Bios again, and start changing to "8G", same, "16G", same. Go to "1G", windows take that (insert confused face here). Went again, changed to "512MB", windows take that. Is the same across all selections. From "64MB" up until "2G", it's functioning, after that, nothing, only stays at "2GB of dedicated memory". Windows is sometimes stupid reporting information about the sistem, so i RAN EVERYTHING. GPU-Z, check. AIDA64, check. Unigine Valley, check. Uningine Heaven, check. Overclocking tools (from gigabyte all the way down to ryzenmaster), check. All reports 2GB of "dedicated" Vram. Anyone has a comment on this? same problem? or it's just me?. Another settings to modify in the bios? I have installed my copy of windows without UEFI, that is said, to enter the bios i don't have to go through the options in windows to acces it. ¿Maybe thats the problem? I searched for all day (it's my day off), and i have not came across anything like my problem and at this point, im out of options. This is why this post. Thanks, and have a great day you all.
  6. THAT IS... YOU ARE GOD! jajajaj... thanks man, with DXwnd i was able to run the game with some tweaking, not full screen (the game still crashes in full screen), but i was able to play it... o lord of pc's, thanks for bringing a messenger... At this time, i think is a problem with the desktop and how windows handle it. I will try to solve it with no use of the DXwnd. Moreover, i think is a problem with aero or some crap like that in the effects that windows put in the desktop. For now, im enjoyng the game.
  7. Hi, so... the tittle seems legit... If you don't want to read all, scroll down to the RESUME at the end. I have my new PC (Ryzen 5 2400G) running and playing all day (when im not working). The problem is that recently i found my copy of "Shogun Total War: Warlord Edition"... i've tried everything, all solutions i've found online, and seems to go nowere. The problem is that my hardware and the SO (W10) don't wan't to run it. The game was released in 2000, so, retro-compatibility is a nono. I come with an idea, set a VM, get my older Wxp and install the game in it, another "fiasco". The game runs at 3fps, not playable at all. Diggin in the configurations I ended up in the hardware administrator on the XP in the VM... to my surprise is running in software mode, i go to the unknown devices and is there, the graphics card, but windows reject to recognize it. No drivers to install and no way to solve it. The main problem is that after 4 days+ reading and surfing the net, it seems that "GPU EMULATION" doesn't exist, or i really suck in english (not my language so im working hard tipyng here). If is someone out there that knows more of this than me, ¿is it possible to "emulate older gpu's" in a newer gpu?, that includes triking the OS to thinking that i have another gpu apart from the integrated one (like GTX450 or ATI equivalent), and emulated in my integrated GPU or even in the CPU, so i can install the drivers in the VM-Wxp to run the game. Resume: Is some way to emulate an older GPU on my newer GPU or CPU (doesn't matter in wich one) so i can play older games in my virtual machine with WindowsXP? All other options (like compatibility mode, even editing files of the game) are a nono, no one works. (The game: "Shogun Total War: Warlord Edition")
  8. Hi, first of all, i am self toad speak english, aaaaand my first post here, so expect a little bit of dumb-writting of my part (if thats makes any sense). To the point: i recently buy the asus dual gtx 1060 3gb gddr5 (arround 250 us dollars here -argentina-, the 1060 6gb version cost plus 80 so, no way, no money, 1070 go up at least another 250, and 1080 dont want to know), i expect some upgrade from my previous vcard (r7 250 ultimate 2gb gddr5). The change was gigantic, but, i can't really make the difference between the 1080 and 1060. I know the difference in vram, cuda cores, and other stuff, but i see a lot of test in the 1080, and tried in my 1060. I was shock in one way (cpu bottleneck haha -we cant expect much of an a10 7850k overclocked at 4.5ghz but still-), i see that my vcard in idle managed 1540, and see a LOT of vids that the turbo in this particular card go as much as 17xx mhz, but in my case, my card goes up to 2016mhz in turbo mode with an stable 65C° with no thermal throtle at all. I push even further with evga xoc and managed to overclock at 2182mhz core and vram from the 4000mhz stock to 4200mhz-ish with upper 60C° to middle 70C° (sometimes got 76C° but drop to 75C° almost instantly) without changing voltage (if blows up, i never can buy another). I want (if its possible), to see (if anyone -or linus, if he want-) make a video to see the difference in real world ('cause i barely got my 1060, and my pocket still hurts, no way buying the 1080) between this two cards (the same, asus dual gtx 1060 3gb vs 1080). P.S: whenever i have time, i update this post with screen captures. Writing in my phone at 5 a.m, warm in my bed, and with the cold in this house, nah, im not waking up now. Note: if you make trhougt and still here, and, if you can understand me, you are a fucking genious, and... go to the clinic... maybe your eyes start to cry blood. EDIT: here we go with the screen captures (i made a few mistakes, 1569mhz stock without turbo, 1974mhz turbo enabled, aaaand, the overclock crash with the sintetic stress in aida64 (in games has no crashed yet), but, at least, this are the frecuencies at stock-turbo. For some reason when the turbo kicks in, the clock of the memory goes down 200mhz (at least that is in the evga software)
×