Jump to content

lefudgelover666

Member
  • Posts

    195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lefudgelover666

  1. both untrue, 771 chips perform like core 2 quads, the jump to Sandy bridge from a Harpertown xeon is night and day, sandy was a massive jump
  2. the 771 setup is budget af, but even after a heavy oc would bottleneck anything over a 1050ti, recommending somemthing that old is terrible when the budget allows for newer much superior hardware
  3. get the best office chair you can for your budget, those will be comfort first, looks second, while any gaming chair will be looks first
  4. yeah no, not really possible, all non adaptive sync monitors tear in the exact same way because they refresh at the exact same rate, a 60 hz monitor will refresh 60 times per second at the exact same interval, thats what adaptive sync changes, it slows the monitor refresh rate to match the gpu fps, without adaptive sync this does not happen and is impossible regardless of whether its a $1000 or a $50 monitor
  5. what? that makes no sense, all monitors without adaptive sync will tear exactly the same
  6. yes, the coulds are an upgrade in every possible way from the A50's aside from not being wireless
  7. the price of a pixelbook gets you in Dell XPS ballpark, which is miles better
  8. its pretty well known that razer is aesthetic over quality
  9. i have a 75" as well but i only use it for movies, the latency just not something i can cope with in a game and aside from being big its pretty much inferior to my monitors in every other way so i stick to watching movies on my ultrawide
  10. from my experience no, unless its older titles, you have to remember that its less than perfect scaling,
  11. buy a pack of zip ties and just run them through the motherboard in an x pattern over the cooler block, i am using that methon on a hyper 212 i dont have mounting hardware for and it works fine
  12. its 1-5% faster, not 10-15%, and on average 10-15% more expensive
  13. its kind of impossible to not talk vram since available vram makes a massive difference in the size of the framebuffer if these were cars thats like saying "aw yeah theyre both V8's but displacement doesnt matter even though one is 610 cubic inch and the other is 305" or if it were food " aw dude no its okay if you only got a half full cup and the guy in front of you got a full one, theyre the same size cup so its all good
  14. rgb is neat, but after 2 years of stuffing my system with rgb its become a little nauseating, i prefer the black and gold accent of my Team Group Xtreem 4000 over the Vengeance rgb they replaced any day, but thats personal preference
  15. not really, the 1060 3gb has 50% less VRAM and 10% less cuda cores and SM's, as Gamers Nexus showed, that can lead to up to a 30% diffirence in Vulkan titles or 5-10% in others the 1070ti only has 5%less SM's and cuda cores, and for the most part performanc is 0-5% apart and that gap is not only overcome but beaten by simply overclocking theres a reason steve says the 3GB 1060 is the real 1050ti and not worth of being called 1060 1070ti is the better option as long its a cheaper non mini card
  16. $20-40, but its something that would take a long time to sell for very little return, pull the ram stick and psu, scrap the rest
  17. of course the 24 wont look as sharp, the 21.5" will look exactly as sharp as a 43" 4k display, while the 24" will have the same pixel density as a 48" 4k tv, personaly i would never go below 24". its just too small after that for me to enjoy any content
  18. thats 1080-1080Ti price for something that will perform worse than both
  19. heatguns used to melt the display adhesive are far far far hotter, its completely safe, just softens the vinyl a little
  20. struggling in what way? could just be crappy upload speed
  21. special edition is probably higher binned too, all of the sapphire limited/special ed cards ive had in the past have been much better overclockers than the standard
×