Jump to content

Goildzy

Member
  • Posts

    189
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Goildzy

  1. You have issues and ur statements do not mix up well with what you say. I wonder if you even read that article and if you even read at all. Im not the one making ur points, your the one remaking my own points and than claim that they are yours?! Thats what you get for not reading well. You have no understanding how marketing works. Looking above, I see clouds. I quote my own ways plz learn to not be so weird. Its not my problem you dont even take time reading full posts and think with the text. You can save ppls time but facts are that marketing show alot of different stories about who has what spinning at home. That i said i would buy amd over intels 6 core is due of the price performance you get and not how strong intels chips are. Ill save peoples money instead. Intel made us stay behind, why wouldnt they drop in size? Another kabylake extension for real. Intel says $$$ gimme your money. Why do i even bother this anymore you sound like your defending yourself not reality. Get realistic. You sound really mad, and wrong too. Your on a ryzen and dont even know how they work, its why i gave you that article. Your info is false.........
  2. The budget is so tight! Its so tight that i almost wanna add soap to make it a lil smoother. I also dont wanna recommend a dual core But the G4560 is an excellent chip!
  3. Everyone is getting plagued by biased things and conclude from there. Im like trying to show that it doesnt really matter alot, 7700k becomes really important if u wanna max out builds 5-10k for pure pro (so money earning) gaming, to squeeze out everything out of ur gpu's. For the rest its all overkill, actually imo i like the 7700k alot (if u oc) on 1080p with a cheap gpu to max out any desired hz u wanna play on. And also i like it alot cause if you just only buy a cheap board (that can oc) and stuff in a nice 7700k with 16 gb ram or 8 even (prefer 16), you have a very nice cpu+igpu for only around 400-500 total budget build, and that is amazing! If i saw a 7700k with the same cores as ryzen 7 but also the same speeds as the 7700k we know for a $400, id buy that instantly! But we all know it will be 800-1000, and that just APPLE-ISH jup i said it...
  4. Im yet to see the first intel on 8cores+ hitting 5ghz. The problem with more cores is heat. Lower clocks is less heat to compensate this.
  5. I did some digging for you. https://pcpartpicker.com/list/nqWB9W this is the list of the next video $464 I hope it will clear up some things. You can dig around a lil more and compare builds I like how he uses a dual ram option here 2x4, tho it wouldnt benefit alot in games.
  6. My advice keep the intel build-ish one. or near those specs for the budget. BUY a 1050 TI even if u have to wait longer they come around 150-170 (euro that is) prob cheaper in dollars. its the only real way i can ensure that gaming will feel nice-ish (depends per person). You have a very tight gaming budget. Ryzen 5 indeed is a nice one (1400 comes cheaper). But remember all that it comes down to is GPU for gaming, the cpu is there to push the speed within the limits of ur gpu. Im not sure how a G4560 + 1050 ti will do in games @ 1080p, but im sure youtube knows. I wouldnt really rely on the IGPU tho they are strong these days.
  7. your first one was better now u have no graphics
  8. point is he need to stay in budget, and a ryzen wont have Igpu.
  9. Will check asap took a vacation meanwhile brt in 10 min this makes me even more curious! What a tease.
  10. rofl cupcake Yes the r5 1600 is an awesome chip for the price, you couldnt be unhappy with that price/performance ... actually i think it might be one of the best price/performance deals you can make atm when aiming to OC the 1600 obv.
  11. Im curious for MVPernulas biuld! hurry up jeez!
  12. I was hopping around on youtube and replied on alot of em (im such a girl sometimes). There is alot of mistaking by people who think Ryzen bottle necks for example the 1080ti. Ryzen is at 25% cpu usage where 7700k is at 60%. Ryzen has more headroom and 7700k will fail in the future is what i hear or the other way around....people lost it! Aimed pure gaming wise this is not really the truth. I copied a reply from my Youtube to here just cause I had some nerdgasms coming up. So first here are some shout outs by ppl commenting on a youtube video: They're saying the 7700k will bottleneck sooner, as when the 7700k hits 100% the AMD CPU will be at 75%-85%, not sure if that is a factor to consider yet though as i'm not sure when we will be seeing a 7700k hit 100% and i don't think it will be very soon but its still a valid point nonetheless and one that should be talked about. jesus those cpu usage numbers are not a good sign for the intel longevity even if it is slightly faster. the AMD chip is always 15 to 25% lower usage on average it indicates that the intel chip will probably it cpu bottleneck first. compared to ryzen 25%, it will botteneck much sooner. But ryzen is basicly bottlenecking already because it's get lower fps with same graphics card compared to 7700k 7700k will bottleneck sooner? Ryzen is already bottleneck compared to 7700k. (I laughed my ass off on this one) 7700k is bottleneck. let me explain it in analog way. suppose you have only one hand and can please 2 girls with a hand because you are quick and Joe also can but not as fast as you and the difference is he has 2 hands... and the rule is 2 girls by hand, but when there are 4 girls....... Joe can please them and you can´t. Ryzen runs the games at 25-30% CPU load, while performing on par with the higher clocked 7700K. Truly impressive. Anyway after alot more of these I decided to finally reply (edited a little): It is only cause of the 2x 4 cored (glued) chips that percentages show this way. So if there is no game optimisation for more than 4 threads, than when 7700k is 100% the ryzen will be 50% (example) but keep in mind the other 50% of Ryzens cpu will not be used at all for that game. And instead it will be used just for other things like your OS and CO. . Therefor the ryzen will be equally (even faster, due of lower clock speed) maxed out in such terms. Ryzen is not bottlenecking like people think but just slightly lower clocked +/- 1ghz to the 7700k. Either way, if you look at it Ryzen has alot of head room (other 8 threads) to let anything out of the game not interfere within the cores that the game is spinning on, and so it will use 4 cores for that work (8threads) which prevents hickups that the 7700k would surely have when using more programs. Cause 8 threads still doesnt make 8 cores but it keeps at 4 physical. So in the end you could say 7700k is getting old, strong but old. 8 cores can simply handle more pressure overall than 4 physicals. This is the reason why I LMAO on the Analog Explanation about the 2-4 girls. On which i replied that what if those other girls were 2 man, than it would be about developping and the coding of the game (in his term 2 man, UHM girls, uhm whatever) Thanks for the moment of time
  13. Seems like a terrible coded game ! Lol omg rocket league!
  14. Well its simple. 4k on 60hz refresh means it flickers 60 frames per second. So even if you have 5000 fps your display will only output 60 frames per second anyway. With this theory and real time proof you can just hook up a very cheap cpu (wouldnt advice tho) to a 1080ti as long as the cpu pushes 60fps ur good on 4k as 4k is very gpu demanding at these ages. And yes sadly we live in a 200 fps i need 999 fps guy on my 1080p time lol and the overkills i see. The dunking on chips like ryzen is also sad, its a good chip ffs...ok im getting really off topic.
  15. Sli is not standard with all games maybe 10% of em. Indeed try running all the same with 1 card and note the fps and compare them. See where you notice a diff. Optimisation is indeed the problem here, though i secretly wonder how much the 7700k would push out of this! Update your tests please, i predict a drop in Arma 3 on that and a minore one in the division as result of optimisation on sli being different. Heck i think a single well cooled 1080ti would allready spin alot of your games 35-70 on 4k. Goodluck, jeez a 4k pc i dream of such overkilling for my home front! Nice....
  16. +1, reset your settings. After removing cmos do a no powered (power not connected+no battery) butto reset. You hold your powerbutton for 15 secs to suck out all of the power left in the circuits, im not that fan of an hour waiting unless it is a bus to a vacation spot.
  17. Personally stepping up to 144hz on 1440p i would spin up 7700k on a 1080 or ti. I assume you run 1080p, in that case i wouldnt worry that much. Like the people here say: test newer games on your system run high graphic settings and scan your fps (notice that fps meters lower your fps a little too), now you want to obv use those hz of that monitor so you wanna be above 80hz minimum (prefer 100+) which means you need a steady 80fps atleasr to enjoy the most hz out of that monitor. If you happen to dip back a little just see if its because of the 1060 or your cpu (on 1080p 1060 should do nice tho). Higher resolutions ask for more gpu demands as in moving away from your cpu bottleneck. However bottlenecks are relevant, and in your case you dont wanna neck below 100fps average. For example: you could run 4k on a lower clocked quad or dual core on gtx1080(ti) but tbose processors will neck your fps around 30-70 and you would need a faster and more headroom(cores, also depending on the development of the game) cpu like a r7 but even better an i7 8 threaded beast of a game cpu like 7700k to raise that fps as far as the gpu can handle. Just measure your system on high demanding graphics on the max resolution and that will tell you if you need a new cpu or a stronger gpu.
  18. How is it retarded its pretty fun. Hes trying to show a point to people.
  19. I see ppl blindly throw u advices. My question is: what resolution are you planning to game on? What monitor hz do you wanna hit in fps? What are those light tasks you do exactly? . Also gaming relies on a gpu and not a cpu, so it all depends on your demand. If you wanna go 4k you dont need a 7700k. But if you would wanna go hardcore fps on 1440p 144hz you would wanna consider a 7700k, which depends on the work you do cause Ryzen would still hit 100+ any day in the same games just below 7700k and could make up that small loss to you by having workhorse power for multitasking. So basicly it really depends on what you need. You could play 4k gaming on a cheap i5.....ow and the last thing you want or need is a x299 i dunno why people dare suggest you on your 2k budget yuck!
  20. I heard more faulty mistakes on the board. But it still holds record. Im still sceptical about this years release of boards and processors on both sides :(.
  21. This is one example of framerates and gaming on 4k with a cheap processor vs a beast within 60fps framerates Have fun.
  22. Pure gaming focussed upon ur information id say get an i7 k version 4cores over 8threads and oc it a little. Best pick would be 7700k in this case even on ur 1440p. Ryzen 1700 would do too. However prepare for that you will lose a bit of fps compared to 7700k (no drama drop 5-10%) and older games like single threads, so if youre some CSGO fan than i would also go for 7700k or any strong i7 4/8. Since ryzen also has memory related problems, you can stay on your older stuff/setup by going for intel here. I feel that your aiming towards gaming and this is what is the current best situation for that. Unless youre like me and want a better chip like ryzen 1700 at the cost of some fps due of higher frequenty on the 7700k vs all other win claims on ryzens side. Also if you can wait till august or the end of august i bet the prices will be much nicer for you, looool and all of us too! AMD will release threadripper and vega and intel will release the more cored chips. All in this year!
  23. Lol! I not like purple directly but i like apart themes yes! I was talking bout 2x 1070 not a single 1080ti. 1080ti tho i want that! And will get.
×