Sinole

dont worry , it doesnt have that many power leads anyway. just 1 6+2

yeh, you don't wana do something to crazy with 70$ power supply , like over clocking a X platform cpu or powring a 3090. I was thinking more in terms of efficiency and stability for a cheap system. but thank you for the great info.

lol i actually have had a power supply just blow up on me mid game. I was playing return to Krondor 20 years ago. that was my first costume computer that someone made for me. you are right, its pretty scary. thanks

i build computers on a regular, it was something i saw on amazon. if it works even for life of its warranty up to expectation sounds like a very good offer. its a brand new listing on amazon, what are you talking about. https://www.amazon.com/Apevia-ATX-JP1000-Jupiter-Certified-Crossfire/dp/B07817VQJM/ref=sr_1_6?dchild=1&keywords=1000w+power+supply&qid=1599121473&sr=8-6 well, i guess the listing sounds a little wired and outdated now that you say it. lol , supports dual core and quad core CPUs. oooooooooooooo

Hi everyone I wanted to know hat are your thought on this "Apevia ATX-JP1000" its a 69 dollars power supply rated for 1000 W it has 80+ bronze rating. but common it bought 500w silver power supplies for that price not even gold. Is this a reputable brand? can i trust this unit? or better asked, have anyone used to tested it befor?

the thing is these new intel cards are very small, they fit in PCIE slot on motherboard and they give you Bluetooth as well. i actually updated my links to an even better version.

OK this is a very big conundrum for me here, when i build my computer i chose Tplink Archer 1900 for my wifi card and i am very happy with it, but i still had to buy Bluetooth dongle on top of this expensive wifi card. later i found Intel Wireless-Ac 9260 that uses an intel wifi card that give you high speed wifi connection in addition to 4.2 Bluetooth and it is much cheaper than my wifi card. now question is, weather there is an advantage to these expensive dedicated wifi cards or I wasted my money? that being said my network speed and reliability is real good with tp link card. i never used a gigabyte Intel card, all i had was low end ones on my laptops and didn't have good experience. I really want to know if i should consider Intel Wireless-Ac 9260 for my next build. or should i stick to tested Tplink Archer 1900 ? strong and reliable connection is very important for me.

do you want to duplicated the game on the other monitor or you want to extend ? if you want to duplicate you have to do it with the lowest resolution that both monitors can support i guess.

i bought a laptop from Dubai, it was very cheap, when i came here i said OK ill buy one of these cables. first one burned, literary burned , i could smell, second one just stopped working, so i just bought a european to american adapter.

i have spectrum , they gave me free modem. they charge 10 $ for wifi. thats why i am telling him to get his own wifi. buying your own modem is a huge headache. the compatibility and installing just not worthid. you have to call them give them mac address, they will tell you its not compatible and .......

well i don't like to buy second hand routers, because just like power supplies their performance does get reduced over time. i do not know why, but I have experienced performance reduction on old routers. but you defiantly need a new router and i do not like ISP modem router combos. i never had good experience with them. that's why i am suggesting to you what i did. buy a cheap new router for a littel more than $ 20 - $ 30 and i think most ISPs provide free cable modem.

maybe i didn't phrase my sentences well, i think for this individual, who does occasional content creation + gaming and streaming, intel is a better choice. looks like he does everything with this computer and in that case he will enjoy the single threaded performance of 7700. Although having a 1700 does improve his content creation it doesn't improve his overall experience. it is also much cheaper for him to stick with intel .

you are right it is better but not crushing thats all i am saying

I dont see 1700 in there and over clock that i7 7700k to 5.1 ghz and you will see the performance gap close, you cannot overclock ryzen more than 4 ghz. i am not intel fan, sure ryzen might be a little better in multi threading but most of the things you do daily are single threaded.

remember Linus always says it is better to upgrade to one generation older platform, because new platforms are always buggy, you situation is unique though, you are upgrading a little soon and to better performance. i usually upgrade every 3-4 years, even with my gpus.