So. I'v watched this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGq8uJSco1o
Just from that i can tell that they've go a lot of trouble managing their network. Im not trying to say that Anthony is bad. I think that for a company that size and for company that basically does'nt work without their network running at 100% all the time it would be nice to have someone who is really familiar with the hardware they're running and should be able to configure it from his memory.
I'm suggesting that they should try some of Mikrotik's hw.
I am a networking student. I have some experience wit Mikrotik and would recommend it over other brands.
For example: I think that Ubiquity is meh hardware but very nice and organized sw. BUT. It has SO few abilities.
Cisco... oh boy. That is some high quality hw. BUT. The software is terrible. I mean that it does the routing, vLANing and overall working with packets very good, but the configuration is soooo terrible.
And on that note, I would recommend Mikrotik. They have selection from home small unpowerful router to high-end enterprise 10 Gig networking and more. Their sw is veeery good. The configuration is done perfectly. When you youse ther winbox program you have it done in a moment. Winbox is a windows only gui configurator of ther RouterOS(OS that runs on Mikrotik devices) that makes it very easy. Also RouterOS provides all, but really all of the features, that LMG would need.
PfSence is not bad, but again, the configuration is unclear in most parts and not understandable.
For example this: https://mikrotik.com/product/CCR1072-1G-8Splus
It's kinda pricy, but nothing in comparison woth cisco.
I am using this particular model in my lab in school and damn it's powerful.