Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


This user doesn't have any awards

About VegetableStu

  • Title

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Single Status Update

See all updates by VegetableStu

  1. so someone made a rant on a research paper with poor phrasing regarding this "Quantum Supremacy" thing, and while it's reassuring that the end result is "Quantum Crypto-Cracking Computers is not going to be a thing untill they solve the very fundamental issues with quantum computing in the first place as step one", I'm... kinda lost in the explanation from both sides...?





    1. 2FA


      It sounds like the paper claimed to be able to solve problems by taking a small set of data and extrapolating it (adding the small samples 1 and 2 qubit samples together) to actual full fledged problems by keeping track of a supposed bias in quantum interference. However, Isis mentions that quantum probabilities are non-additive and that you can't scale the data simply by adding or extrapolating it.