Jump to content

For Science!

Member
  • Posts

    5,365
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    For Science! got a reaction from Hany Ghoneim in PSU won't jump start with bridging plug   
    In case I'm not very clear with the above, please look at my picture below to illustrate what I mean, please note that this PSU is a TYPE 4 one so the pinout is not the same as yours *RM750x).
     

  2. Agree
    For Science! got a reaction from Sir Beregond in Corrosion of demineralized water?   
    You should always have inhibitor additives, and change water on a regular schedule.
  3. Funny
    For Science! reacted to TheNaitsyrk in SFF luggable build vs MSI Titan laptop   
    Did a little crappy mock up of this case as well to help me visualise it's really not that big to be honest 


  4. Informative
    For Science! got a reaction from RevGAM in The Best Documented PC Coolants   
    It has been almost 2 years since my original discussion about coolants used in liquid cooling being poorly annotated. As you can imagine, not much has changed since . As we all should know, the identity of the fluid running through the PC has little-to-no impact on the performance since the transfer of the heat from a waterblock to the liquid or the liquid to the radiator is not the rate limiting step, it is the radiator --> air step that has the lowest thermal conductivity. This is why whether it is water, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, liquid metal, the thermal capacity and performance of the loop is unlikely to change.
     
    Thus provided that the fluid is passing through the system without clogs, the only thing about a coolant is whether it protects the system from growth and corrosion. Like with any computer component, it is important to know the technical specs of anything you want in your system.
     
    I have taken it upon myself to compile a summary of coolants and their document active ingredients, highlighting which products have scientifically justifiable components in them. Please note that I have not taken the dye identity into account since pretty much all companies do not list the identity of the dye and so therefore this tier list does not reflect how "cloggy" a coolant is. This tier list reflects how well documented a particular coolant is and how you use it is up to you, it is entirely possible and likely that the coolants contain more substances, but this is based on what is publicly available on their websites. As a minimum, hopefully you can use it to find coolants that are incompatible with PETG. 
     
    Tier 1: Biocidal and Anti corrosive compounds specified
    Tier 2: Some active ingredient specified, but missing anti-corrosives or biocide
    Tier 3: MSDS provided, but lacking any active ingredient
    Tier 4: No Information found
     
    Clear Coolants
    Tier 1
    aquacomputer DP Ultra: 20-35% Ethylene Glycol, <1% Benzotriazole
    EK-CRYOFUEL Concentrate: 2.5-5 % Sodium 2-ethylhexanoate, <0.02 % Methylisothiazolinone, 0.1-1% Methyl-1H-benzotriazole
    Innovatek Protect IP: >25% Ethylene Glycol, 0.5-0.75% Sodium 2-ethylhexanoate, 0.075-0.1 % disodium tetraborate pentahydrate
    Phobya ZuperZero Xtreme Concentrate: 30-35% Ethylene Glycol, 10-15% Potassium 2-EthylHexanoate
    Phobya ZuperZero Clear: 25-30% Ethylene Glycol,  <1% Sodium 2-EthylHexanoate , <1% disodium tetraborate pentahydrate
     
    Tier 2
    Alphacool Eiswasser Crystal Clear UV: <0.1 % Glutaraldehyde 
    Mayhems XT-1: <90% Ethylene Glycol
    Nanoxia CoolForce: 90% Ethylene Glycol
    XSPC ECX: 0.1-0.3 % "Antirust Additive", 50-80% Propylene Glycol, 0.01-0.1 % "Bactericide" - **Tier 2 for being unspecific
    XSPC EC6: 10-100% Propylene Glycol
     
    Tier 3
    Coollaboratory Liquid Coolant Pro: 10 % Ethylene Glycol
    Mayhems X1: 40 % Glycerol
    PrimoChill TrueTM Infused: Nothing
    Thermaltake T1000: N/A [<6% Propylene Glycol]
     
    Tier 4
    Corsair Hydro X XL5: N/A
    DImasTech X-Fluid: N/A
     
    Opaque Coolants
    Tier 1
    EK-CRYOFUEL OPAQUE CONCENTRATE: 1-2.5 % Sodium 2-ethylhexanoate, 0.01-0.1 % Methylisothiazolinone 
     
    Tier 2
    Alphacool Eiswasser Pastel: <0.1 % Glutaraldehyde, <0.1%Octan-1-ol ethyoxylated
    Nanoxia CoolForce: 90% Ethylene Glycol
    Thermaltake C1000: >90% Ethylene Glycol
    XSPC EC6: 10-100% Propylene Glycol
     
    Tier 3
    PrimoChill TrueTM Infused: Nothing
    Thermaltake P1000: N/A [<6% Propylene Glycol]
     
    EOL and not recommended
    Mayhems Pastel (Concentrate): 40 % Glycerol
    Mayhems Pastel: 10 % Glycerol
     
    SFX Coolants
    Tier 3
    Mayhems Aurora Booster: 99% Glycerol
    Mayhems Aurora: 40 % Glycerol
    Primochill Vue: 14% "Proprietary" 
     
     
  5. Agree
    For Science! got a reaction from fonzz1e in Best source/setup for controlling fan speed?   
    Set pump to a constant speed, and fans tied to coolant temperature. Nothing else required.
  6. Agree
    For Science! got a reaction from Blai5e in Best source/setup for controlling fan speed?   
    Set pump to a constant speed, and fans tied to coolant temperature. Nothing else required.
  7. Like
    For Science! got a reaction from Daftlander in Printer suggestions for experienced hobbyist.   
    Imo Bambu labs has not been around for long enough to know its true "long-term" potential. Especially given its relatively closed ecosystem and proprietary parts, its a bit hazy outlook. Furthermore, if you look at issues with the AMS system, you can see there are teething problems that need addressing by the company.

    Obviously you are in the prusa territory, I personally really enjoyed using the Mk3S+(ish) and can recommend it. If input shaping ever releases on the Mk4, that would also make it faster generally too,
  8. Informative
    For Science! reacted to 22LeoG93 in Custom Headphone Cable Help   
    The correct version is B)
    Just found this becuase i was cabling the Headset and tried version A) but wasnt right.
     
    Hope this helps everyone which is at the same stage, 😉 btw the Fiio btr5 works great with the hifiman Sundara 🚀
     

  9. Funny
    For Science! got a reaction from Craftyawesome in Samsung moon "enhancement".   
    I'll just grab my tin foil hat and say that Samsung has started developing a massive death-laser on the moon, and so want to make sure its details are never captured by "enhancing" the image and thereby wiping any images of the death laser.
  10. Funny
    For Science! got a reaction from WhitetailAni in Samsung moon "enhancement".   
    I'll just grab my tin foil hat and say that Samsung has started developing a massive death-laser on the moon, and so want to make sure its details are never captured by "enhancing" the image and thereby wiping any images of the death laser.
  11. Agree
    For Science! got a reaction from LAwLz in Samsung moon "enhancement".   
    Ultimately, each to their own definitions and to gate-keep what they consider a "photo". I would for example consider a panoramic photo to be a "photo", but you evidently would not - and that's fine. A weird line to draw for example a single long-exposure with a star tracker vs stacking aligned shorter exposures in post.
  12. Funny
    For Science! got a reaction from emothxughts in Samsung moon "enhancement".   
    I'll just grab my tin foil hat and say that Samsung has started developing a massive death-laser on the moon, and so want to make sure its details are never captured by "enhancing" the image and thereby wiping any images of the death laser.
  13. Like
    For Science! got a reaction from mykeworthy in Samsung moon "enhancement".   
    I'll just grab my tin foil hat and say that Samsung has started developing a massive death-laser on the moon, and so want to make sure its details are never captured by "enhancing" the image and thereby wiping any images of the death laser.
  14. Funny
    For Science! reacted to Uttamattamakin in Samsung moon "enhancement".   
    IT's a matter of technicalities.  Given the forum is that really so strange? 
  15. Agree
    For Science! got a reaction from dalekphalm in Anyone here know much about reverse osmosis?   
    I think you're over simplifying the matter, and I would also recommend you to get professional help. Making drinking water is no joke task.

    But to answer your question, in terms of ease of removal

    Insoluble solids (dirt) --> Insoluble liquids (oils) --> Soluble charged compounds (Ions) --> Soluble partially charged organics would be order of ease of removal.
  16. Funny
    For Science! reacted to Shadow_Storm56 in Anyone here know much about reverse osmosis?   
    Usually it's just the after taste that is variable but can be good or not good. Tastes like leaves a bit when it's not great. A brita will not take the color away but it will further improve the taste.
  17. Like
    For Science! got a reaction from Arika in Anyone here know much about reverse osmosis?   
    Sulfur and iron or dirt, color...taste ect. are not methods of water purification, so yeah, reverse osmosis will be a better method than no method. However RO is generally a last polishing step for already clean water, so if you have dirty water, it is not so practical to use RO to clean it up, think of other pre-purification steps such as resin affinity, or distillation.
  18. Agree
    For Science! got a reaction from Needfuldoer in Anyone here know much about reverse osmosis?   
    Sulfur and iron or dirt, color...taste ect. are not methods of water purification, so yeah, reverse osmosis will be a better method than no method. However RO is generally a last polishing step for already clean water, so if you have dirty water, it is not so practical to use RO to clean it up, think of other pre-purification steps such as resin affinity, or distillation.
  19. Like
    For Science! reacted to Hurin in Testing a pump with just a bin of water?   
    Thank you!  Understood.  If it's quiet outside the case, I won't "blame" it for whatever it does when it's in its home!
     
    My googling seems to show there's nothing wrong with the Corsair XD5 since it's Xylem-made like pretty much everyone else.  Though I'm planning on going EK for blocks.
     
    The overall plan is to quiet down and cool this CPU.  Then find a 4080 or 4090 with no/minimal coil whine (Zotac or an FE seems best bet in the US), and then replace the louder fans (especially on Zotac) with water cooling as well.  I've become a bit obsessed.  And finding out if the pump is quieter than my AIO (and moderate gpu coil whine) is the first step in determining if this will be worthwhile.  If it is. . . I'll finally be able to check "custom water loop" off my bucket list!
     
    Thanks!
     
    --H
  20. Like
    For Science! got a reaction from frozensun in devices on USB ports stop working or either work with lag   
    Is the problem specific when you copy between the two drives?
     
    Ext. HDD1 --> Ext. HDD2
     
    and does it happen in the reverse direction
     
    Ext. HDD2 --> Ext. HDD1
     
    Additionally, does the problem happen when you copy from an internal drive to the external drives simultaneously
     
    Internal Drive --> Ext HDD1. and HDD2. at the same time
     
    If so, does the problem happen when its only just one of the drives
     
    Internal Drive --> Ext HDD1 only, or HDD2 only.
     
    Also as a curiosity, if you plug your keyboad and mouse into front panel ports, does this happen?
     
  21. Like
    For Science! got a reaction from tjrose91 in Cold Temps and Custom Cooling   
    Just be aware that not all PC coolants have anti-freeze properties.
  22. Agree
    For Science! got a reaction from Crunchy Dragon in Cold Temps and Custom Cooling   
    Just be aware that not all PC coolants have anti-freeze properties.
  23. Agree
    For Science! got a reaction from Blai5e in 7 months on, my custom loop has been tainted. Using Corsair Red (yes, I know) and I'm trying to figure out the best solution   
    I assume this is refering to the dye that's accumulated between the acrylic and the jet plate no flow area. Inly cosmetic, and a non-issue. So nothing to fix, and also don't use alcohol on acrylic blocks, they can get cloudy or even crack.
  24. Agree
    For Science! got a reaction from LIGISTX in 7 months on, my custom loop has been tainted. Using Corsair Red (yes, I know) and I'm trying to figure out the best solution   
    I assume this is refering to the dye that's accumulated between the acrylic and the jet plate no flow area. Inly cosmetic, and a non-issue. So nothing to fix, and also don't use alcohol on acrylic blocks, they can get cloudy or even crack.
  25. Agree
    For Science! reacted to LIGISTX in 7 months on, my custom loop has been tainted. Using Corsair Red (yes, I know) and I'm trying to figure out the best solution   
    I am not sure I even see the issue? It doesn't look gunked up to me, is it flowing somewhat normally? 
×