Jump to content

KazInVan

Member
  • Posts

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Photography

System

  • CPU
    Intel i7-6700K
  • Motherboard
    Asus Z170-A
  • RAM
    32GB Corsair
  • GPU
    AMD R9 390
  • Case
    Fractal R5
  • Storage
    960 EVO, 850 EVO, 6TB tiered/mirrored Storage Space, 2TB mirrored Storage Space
  • PSU
    Corsair 850W
  • Display(s)
    Benq SW2700PT, HP Z24i
  • Cooling
    Corsair H100i
  • Keyboard
    MS Natural Ergo 4000
  • Operating System
    Win 10 Pro

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

KazInVan's Achievements

  1. No, they don't have to use signatures. We have big parts of our network (the OT network) that has no internet access no automated updates, no sandbox, and the system works as designed.
  2. I worked for one of the bigger cybersecurity companies in the past and now run IT so need to make decisions that affect big networks. Cylance has little impact on system performance and still my preferred endpoint AV product.
  3. By looking at what each process is attempting to do. Cylance is still the best endpoint AV tool out there in terms of ability to prevent compromise and they don't use signatures at all. I have tested multiple AV tools against the same viruses in a lab setting, Cylance was the only app that passed all tests.
  4. That is plain wrong. Next gen AV doesn't even use signatures at all.
  5. Macs are definitely less susceptible to malware.
  6. Any good endpoint AV tool should have stopped this as well. It's a failing of the whole security stack, which includes the training of staff.
  7. Zipped malware can slip through mail filters, but a good anti-malware tool on the endpoint should have caught that crap once triggered. Anyone know what was running on the endpoint?
  8. Thanks, I'm happy with the result. Definitely not as seamless as Intel, that platform seems far more tolerant of ram timings, etc. Still, nice to see a good bump in performance overall. Now I can finally install the rest of my software Thanks for your help. The 3950X looks like a monster, I'm sure that will crush video work. I'm going to wait for 4000 series Ryzen and hopefully that will be a drop-in upgrade in 12-18 months. That and a PCIE 4 SSD and I should be good for another performance bump.
  9. It took hours of fiddling with it and pulling the battery to get settings that seem stable. Pain in the butt, glad that's over
  10. Oh, and I tried TONS of timings and OC settings getting something even quasi stable at CL14 but much slower bandwidth. Don't need to push my luck, this seems decent. Even minor tweaks from here caused post issues. I had to pull battery about 6 times tonight, no need to wrestle it more to get another 1%
  11. Too early to say for sure this problem is licked but bench seems fine now. I started testing timings of ram, and dropped my fabric and ram speed to get faster timings. I then noticed that DOCP profile sets ram to 3603Mhz which means fabric has to go to 1802. What I read is that anything >1800 and you don't get the 1:1 coupling which isn't good for performance unless you get to very fast speeds. So I dropped ram to 3533, set timings to stock (16-19-19-39) and did a slight OC on the CPU. CB 20 is now 515 for single core, which is awesome.
  12. Looking better, though I did manage to get a 514 CB20 single core with different mem timings so might play with that a bit.
  13. FCLK set to 1800 so now it's in coupled mode and seems to be working better.
  14. This is with your settings. I notice fabric clock is 1600 and memory is 1800. From what I know of Ryzen you want 1:1. I'm going to go back and change it. I also can't go to 140% on the voltage. Mine only goes to 130 and it's show in scary red so I just set it to 120.
×