Soundsystem90
-
Posts
319 -
Joined
Content Type
Forums
Status Updates
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Store Home
Posts posted by Soundsystem90
-
-
It's 2016 not 2010.
-
As said get an eye test please.
-
1 minute ago, Kloaked said:
Dude what? I didn't say single player, and your GPU should be working it's ass off when you don't have v-sync enabled.
Do you pay attention to anything?
His FPS goes above 60FPs all the time.. he's on an easy map, try the others.. constantly below 60FPs...
" no i have 16 gbs of ram and i5 6500 paired with gtx 970 lots of stutttering and bttleneck no i have 16 gbs of ram and i5 6500 paired with gtx 970 lots of stutttering and bttleneck "
-
Just now, Kloaked said:
Any gaming benchmark I find is showing me the contrary to what you're saying.
Again, provide some evidence and I'll admit I'm wrong.
Oh yeah single player benchmarks, really makes sense does it not? vs multiplayer..
LMAO
Dat GPU usage though at 1440P LMAO
-
Just now, Kloaked said:
>during beta
>isn't comparing an i5 to the i7 during beta
>didn't provide evidence again
LOL retail is even more demanding than the beta, look for your damn self and you will find many videos showing you what i said lol.
-
Just now, MANIDY inc said:
I have no problem running every game 60fps on ultra
Yup everyone else is lying.
-
1 minute ago, Kloaked said:
You've produced no proof of this other than "DAE THINK YOU NEED MOAR THAN 4 THREADS FOR GAMING AMIRITE"
Those videos you keep linking also have no proof of the performance gains over an i5. Please provide actual evidence and I'll admit that you're right.
-
1 minute ago, MANIDY inc said:
Telling me from your cereal box
i5's and 4 cores are slowing down... and all you have as a retort is a cereal box.
I was also called a child.
Never mind.
-
Just now, MANIDY inc said:
Duh it's better but need NEEDED.
Lol kids crack me up
Enjoy under utilised GPU and lower FPS then i don't actually care TBH but heh just telling you how it is.
-
First gen XEON.
-
1 minute ago, Kloaked said:
And it is your experience that a 6600k will make BF1 stutter and drop below 60fps at every resolution on every graphics card?
Pretty sure it's the same story as it's always been with the i7 and i5 for gaming: there's very little difference, and it's not worth the extra money unless you just have the money.
OP clearly doesn't want to spend that much as he's wondering if an i5 is worth it over an i3, and the answer is yes.
i7 will gain the person substantially better results in BF1, why is this so hard to understand?
-
Just now, MANIDY inc said:
So below 60 and not stuttering is still considered playable to you?
Ever played a game with loads of stuttering? vs just a lower framerate?
Plus you just made an argument out of thin air when more threads on intel CPU's achieve better results than any of the i5's, the 6600K may level an i7 980X due to IPC, but anything newer will rekt the i5 in BF1.
I know you guys will defend the i5 seeing as though it's what most people here use lmao.
-
Best time to grab an 8 thread or higher CPU is now, even going with an older gen CPU with more cores on intel will drastically help in BF1.
-
Just now, Kloaked said:
Define unplayable.
Below 60FPS and stuttering, unless this is something you like.
-
Just now, Kloaked said:
Not really. Even if it was that significant (and it's probably not), why would you recommend an overkill CPU just for one game that OP may or may not play?
The difference is huge though.
Playable vs unplayable. GG
Games are not getting easier to run.
-
Just now, CantThinkOfAUserName said:
Who cares about the low end market when are they going to compete with the 1070 and 1080?
Shush and stop trying to downplay it.
-
-
-
Original Half Life on PS2 can be played via mouse and keyboard using the 2 USB ports.
-
. Ratio though.
-
470.
-
Take the PSU and 660 and burn them in a fire.
-
-
Intel boards are fine, all user error.
Cpu for gaming
in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
Posted
I know exactly that it's an i5.