Jump to content

marcgii

Member
  • Posts

    115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Was that error description from the event viewer? Double check if there's any other relevant error events and post screenshots showing the full details.
  2. When XMP isn't stable, then you have to do some manual adjustments. It's not worth your time unless you're into overclocking. But I suppose there's a chance a 1 or 2 voltage tweaks might make stable. You'd need to do research on it.
  3. Doing a quick google search didn't yield any answers on if this is expected behavior. Later I'll make a post about it on the Handbrake forum. My best guess is Handbrake is using slightly different x264 parameters depending on platform. Which would indicate LTT's test methodology is flawed.
  4. Honestly those QVL RAM kits are only a suggestion that the RAM may work at the rated speed. In any case, the issue might be the motherboard. I imagine the Asus Prime series is relatively poor for memory overclocking. That being said, 6400 is a modest OC. If you enable XMP and then manually set the clock to 6000, is it stable? You need to use a dedicated tool to verify stability like the ones mentioned in the post above or Memtest86+
  5. If anything, Meteor Lake is 1st gen. The whole generation thing doesn't apply with Intel's new branding. They may not refer to the Meteor Lake successor as a "2nd gen" in the same AMD doesn't use that terminology either. At least that's my understanding. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
  6. Were they using the x264 encoder? I would assume so based on the settings listed. They really should have but that in the title. It's really surprising for me to see different files between platforms. Is handbrake using different CPU instructions or computations depending system architecture?
  7. It's a shame they couldn't include 4k 120 support. It would have had the benefit of lower latency and great CRT filters.
  8. It's a setting within the unRAID dashboard. But I imagine you figured that out by now lol.
  9. @Plouffe How do the blacks look in moderate lighting? The thing I dislike most about my AW3423DWF is the purple tinting when compared to my LG TV.
  10. Lol they supposedly fixed the issues with current firmware. Yes it says interface is UASP (NVM Express) and it has "VolatileWriteCache" as a supported feature. I'd be happy with the performance if I was getting the same write speeds demonstrated in reviews.
  11. Here's an apples to apples comparison with Amazon review post. My results are on the right.
  12. The results on the right were my own. So I am using a 10 gig usb port. Ceasing all usb activity brought the sequential write performance up to 662 MB/s. So better, but still bad. Meanwhile a real-world 10Gb single file copy is average only about 400 MB/s
  13. I recently got this SSD https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-2TB-Extreme-Portable-SDSSDE61-2T00-G25/dp/B08HN37XC1 Write performance seemed poor, so I tried to replicate some benchmarks posted by others. See screenshot below. I couldn't figure what version and settings this guy was using exactly. But the default profile on v7 should be close enough. As you can see, my read speeds are higher, but my write performance is substantially worse. Sandisk advertises write speeds of 1000 MB/s. Anyone have an idea why it's performing slow on my system? I'm running a 7950X3D on a Gigabyte X670 Aorus Elite AX. SOURCE: https://www.techgearlab.com/reviews/electronics/external-hard-drive/sandisk-extreme-portable-v2 Edit: I ran a manual TRIM on the SSD and it somehow made it worse lol.
  14. https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Optane-960GB-XPoint-959527/dp/B07JD9GZN7 I'm really temped to get one. But sadly it won't fit into the new work laptop I just ordered.
  15. I found the answer by going to the plugin support thread. You have to disable the SMB NetBIOS allow setting.
×