SSOB

It's super overkill for the 1050 ti tho and won't do anything, kind of a bottleneck and waste of money if you ask me!

Great boards, Go for it!

Get a 12 mm ryzen and a cheap board. 1200 12nm is good. Spare cash can go into a fast ssd or maybe try to sell the 1050 ti and upgrade to a better card, an option as well.

ALWAYS a risk, even if you buy the exact same memory, sometimes adding more ram simply causes issues. The Sticks can be different. It's not fun but the manufacturers simply don't care I would try to return the ram and try another kit!

Excellent config imo, Wouldn't change a lot!

I mean you can try but the resistance and stuff on the wire ( right tech gurus) will maybe make it come out too dim etc. But you can try I guess

After the new 4 series, Idc what they do, They're just too ugly to own LOL Ot: This has been done so many times before, It's actally quiet common in Europe tbh..

The v3 version is fine, which that is, otherwise I'd like to see some proof tbh. I look at CAS latency as well. IMO, it's not far off, besides for gaming it's superior still!

But is that going to be in the next 2 years? I highly highly doubt it

Set all the channels from Auto to a channel you desire, Stating you're at a farm, doesn't matter what you choose ( 1-20)

1. MacOS devs 2.Of course, As I stated, all conspiracies at this point 3. No, It doesn't work like that, also watch Dave2D's video, good explanation on the situation 4.Doesn't matter, It's about the developing for the platform, NOT the actual use once the ''program/app is done''

If the shield were to run Windows or MacOS , it would be worth a potato

PC's do not run iOS or Android

That's why this is a discussion topic, Good view

I feel like the GPU's will be so weak on the ARM chips, It won't even be able to handle Youtube at 4k, We will see but I really do believe this is a big decoy

Now, having kept a close eye on the recent developments in the Apple and Intel debacle. There are a few things I want to say, This is not a scientific approach or even journalistic approach to the matter but as someone who has been doing exactly this, keeping eyes on stock portfolios in the ''tech-sector'' , I do believe that Apple will fail in this matter, making this a cover up to go to AMD CPU's making Intel ultimately fail. Now there are a couple of reasons why: 1. Having spoken to developers, they have seen the new kit Apple provided, they have assured me, no developer is waiting for this. They have enlightened me that even Pandora 2 is only vaguely effective, the fact that they have to code for ARM Chips as oppose to x86 has been a true challenge and a true headache, making for a stagnation in developement of apps. One of them, she assured me that it will take at least 5-10 years before things catch up in that regard. Now, people underestimate how big this move is, for the end-user , the normal consumer it's not an issue, but for the people that have to work on it, it will take perhaps a decade before things catch up, can Apple, and the industry as a whole afford this? 2. This can be a decoy to go with AMD chips for the big horsepower in the future. Being Apple, Apple always has ways of doing things in the larger and bigger scheme, whether it be dodging taxes, being somewhat of a fashion brand as oppose to actually developing technology and being a brand that is driven on sales, as oppose to innovation. Which is Totally fine, Without Samsung's engineers, decades ago the x86 ( Mind you x86 does come from the houses of AMD and not Intel, wouldn't it be ironical that on the last legs of this architecture, which might now be the case or may not, it will fall in the hands of AMD again, this would be extremely fair regarding Intel really uses AMD technology for all of the foundations of their silicon, maybe something behind closed doors, maybe not, who knows) Apple would not have been able to release products. Now knowing this, why would they do this? Results speak for themselves, if under the table, Apple Has struck a deal to buy Chips from AMD for 50 dollars, as oppose to 100 dollars on the Intel side, for the same predictable performance, they would of course do this. How to do this without breaking one million contracts and becoming even more of the black sheep in the industry? Taking the loss. It is 100% much easier to Switch to AMD which will CUT COSTS for Apple, Intel however does know this. What can Apple do? Try to cover everything up with the ''Move to ARM'' Who are they kidding, the senior engineers all are thinking that this is the case. Apple is a Cost driven company, Cash is the reason why they breathe, now, if they can do something to cut the cost without losing their brand image, they will. 3. ARM knows that this cannot be done in the foreseeable future. Without a huge capital injection from Apple, there is no way that the GPU performance can come anywhere near the ''Traditional'' x86. Now is this a problem Yes, this is a big problem, again, not for the consumer, but for the developers and professionals who I truly believe, make up a big enough chunk of Apples sales, that this WILL hurt them! Now again once all ''Fails'' And, we stop and we do this and that. The people at Apple have already basically ditched Intel, in this, Intel will have suffered a big enough loss for Apple to say, ''You guys are no longer relevant'' And then proceed to go with the AMD counterparts, Making it kind of more sensible even, Apple and AMD have always had great relationships, I cannot see why not now AMD is on top again. The 4th and most important reason: Lawsuits, after a while, I am sure that Intel will Significantly feel this and start to Sue, Now Apple being the king of lawsuits, this won't be a problem for them, again , can this be the decoy to switch over to AMD, Questions questions and more questions! Would love to hear you guys opinion and views on this!

I'd keep it just for the heck of it but quiet honestly, If you don't sell your components, you can just get a baggy, write on it what it is and but the cables etc. in there.

Yes, there are many differences. Get the best quality cable that way you can be assured you have good Audio over HDMI, also you can have ethernet over HDMI, you can have many versions as well

Go for it boss!

Hey, We can all have dreams can't we OP , 50 bucks for the set is a great deal if you can make it happen, if you actually want to sell it, do 50 bucks bro with the cooler!

The problem is , an exactly similarly priced 9100F is as fast... And new.. I'd be happy with 50 bucks but if you are that businessman, Go for it

I mean,if you want to go throught the effiort and you're tight on cash, Sure!

I'd sell it for 50 bucks and be happy tbh

If you can get a 970 evo plus, a bit more expensive but super fast