radusorin

why do people want amd to fail you do know that if amd succeeds with free sync it will drive down the price of your g sync monitors but fanboys be fanboys and dont care if they have to pay 500 dollars extra 

so nvidia can support ranges of 1-240hz even though they dont have a monitor that has that range but amd cant have 9-240hz because they dont have monitors that have that range 

I'm just gona leave this here. http://www.techspot.com/review/978-amd-freesync/

I hope i'm contributing the right information here,
 
The FX platform on AM3+ has already gotten as "advanced" as it's going to get. With APU's on FM2+ and beyond, they had to start again at the low end, but it has even more room to expand above and beyond what FX could deliver.
 
Right now, the highest end APU, the A10-6800K, at its STOCK settings can deliver performance similar to the FX-4350. When OC'd it can match the FX-6100~6200 (without going too crazy on cooling).
 
I expect the new Kaveri A10-7850k to perform at STOCK, equal to the FX-6300, and again, will be able to OC even higher. That's the improvement that we will see on APU's, from Kaveri and beyond. Little improvements every generation, both in CPU and GPU performance (which is a whole different topic).
 
So please don't criticize AMD for "ditching the high end", they haven't... they're just working their way up again on a different platform.
 
I hope you can understand my logic here. Thanks :]

AMD will still be making CPUs, They go by the name: Opteron