Jump to content

KarathKasun

Member
  • Posts

    5,555
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KarathKasun

  1. Just now, CB1993 said:

    Hi KK thanks for the response

    Out of interest I have had this PC for several years and this is the first time I am having problems, is there any reason why this could be or have I just got lucky all these years?

    Thanks again

    Degradation is a thing, and its possible that the 2x4gb modules were still throwing errors for the whole time but now cant even pass the POST test.

  2. Different modules have different timing requirements.  If you mishmash modules together in the same computer without buying reference JDEC standard speeds you WILL have problems.  In which case you will have to manually find a set of timings that works with ALL modules.

     

    That 8gb reserved on task manager means that 8gb of RAM is failing memory tests on power on, likely because the auto timings from the 2x2gb modules are incompatible with the 2x4gb modules.

  3. 34 minutes ago, Faxon said:

    Okay somehow it just magically works now on auto with the XMP profile. The only things i did were apply the CAD bus strength and change my RttNom value, and I changed command rate to 2T, and now it works with XMP and everything on auto. I'm pretty sure ultimately the only thing I changed was the command rate from 1T to 2T. *flips table* apparently bitching about it publicly scared it into working properly because i'm pretty sure I tried this exact config at some point as well, but apparently not? Who knows, ghosts probably. Either way the real ultimate test is if I can get it to work the same on 2 other rigs. I'm gonna go test it on the 3900x right now and see because that's the one with the same version of Ryzen master that gives you that much control (the version for Zen+ CPUs doesn't have the full refined controls), and a saved profile in case I break things

    edit: Ryzen rig 2 electric timings boogaloo failed but that's okay, its still at 3000 rocking it. Chock it up to luck and call it a day, hopefully the profile sticks this time.
     

    1800 FCLK needs higher SoC (and possibly cLDO VDDP/VDDG) voltage.  Most boards will bump this up to 1.05v+ with any XMP/DOCP profile.  The accepted limit for SoC voltage is in the 1.15v ballpark with an absolute upper limit of 1.2v from the digging I have done.  Im not 100% sure of the upper bounds for the cLDO voltages.

     

    Ryzen 1000 series I could never get 100% stable with 3200+, I always had to back down to 2800-2933.  The system would run at 3200, but I would get a few random crashes a week.  Ryzen 2000 series was supposed to be a bit better with faster memory speeds, but again you still needed to boost SoC voltaage to around 1.1v.

  4. 13 minutes ago, Faxon said:

    So far it won't run above 3000mhz at basically any timings that aren't vastly blown out, and i haven't tried anything extremely loose yet either just because at that point I might as well tighten things down at 3000mhz. The part that's weird to me is it's literally running better on a 2700x in x470 than any of my x570 systems, to the point of it being completely illogical and only needing minimal tuning to work just fine. I'm just trying to isolate what in my config might be causing the issue so I can try and get it to post at reasonable timings

    Do you know what type of chips are on the modules?

     

    My 3200 Hynix modules refuse to run at anything over ~3400 and need 16-20-20-40 to even get that far...

     

     

    Some of your memory controller related voltages look quite low, this is what the memory portion of ryzen master looks like for my trash Hynix memory.

    Capture.PNG

  5. i5-9400f should be good for any GPU unless you are looking for 300+ FPS in CS:GO.

     

    Newer big games use the GPU more heavily than the CPU.  An R3 3300x or i5-9400f is good enough for up to a GTX 2080 in the majority of games.

  6. 22 minutes ago, Skiiwee29 said:

    stuttering and lagging is most certainly what is being mentioned which is 100% going to be caused by a CPU bottleneck in this case since it happens in games that are known to be heavily CPU bound like Call of Duty and GTA5. 

    I do not have those problems in either game with that CPU.  If that was the initial problem, stuttering would be present on both GPUs.

     

    Ive played GTA V on CPUs as old as Xeon E5440s, if you dont go overboard on vegitation or pop density pretty much anything can run that game fairly well.

  7. Just now, jtmoseley said:

    ...

    How does that impact anything? AMD processors are effectively locked. The auto overclocking software on motherboards pushes them to their limits anyways. I personally was unable to get any more performance out of my 3900x from overclocking because the motherboard does it well anyways.

     

    Intel pushes their CPU's similarly.

    3300x has plenty of legs left for overclocking, especially with FCLK.  It can pick up something like 20% performance from basic tuning.

  8. 2 minutes ago, jtmoseley said:

    And I just said that for all intents and purposes they are equivalent now. The 3300x = i3-10100. Both are $120. Both are 4 core 8 threads. You're acting like AMD is somehow better when in reality they offer *very* similar products. For *very* similar prices. And high end intel still beats high end amd in gaming.

    i3 is locked.

×