Checkitman22
-
Posts
123 -
Joined
-
Last visited
1 Follower
Checkitman22's Achievements
-
holy butts, well i know what im doing tonight
-
has anyone watched these, are actually enjoyable / funny http://beta.lifescoop.cm.fmpub.net/2013/11/06/video-6-tips-to-survive-the-reality-of-self-employment/
-
I'm just informing the OP with hard evidence so he doesn't blow his money. Your talk of "future games" means nothing as you don't know the requirements, no one does. What I do know however, is that we are no were near using all 3GB of VRAM at 5670x1080 currently, so it will be a while before that happens. When it does (and it will, no argument there) it will be so far down the line that a Titan will be (or at least starting to be) outdated and antiquated and the poster will need a GPU upgrade regardless. Smart choice, wait for AMD next release of cards.
-
That doesn't mean anything to me... benchmarks please? Lol I know for a fact 3GB is PLENTLY of VRAM at 5670x1080, because its good enough at 7680x1440. It isn't until 7680x1440 that you will see a benefit from 6GB of RAM > 3, and the poster isn't going to be gaming in that super resolution regardless, and EVEN if he was, the performance difference isn't worth the increased price at all.
-
What are you going on about. 3GB is enough for even 7680x1440. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY3Kn1fGGTI also slew of benchmarks http://www.overclock.net/t/1415441/7680x1440-benchmarks-plus-2-3-4-way-sli-gk110-scaling
-
You don't need 6GB for 3 monitors... my bud uses 2 7950s for 2560*1440 3 monitors just fine. Titans are a HUGE waste of money, wait till AMDs next GPUs.
-
So you still think games will look different on each version? Doubt it. http://microsoft-news.com/microsoft-xbox-one-vs-sony-ps4-spec-comparison/ They are VERY similar in the GPU department. -
I'd gladly pay 600 USD for either console just to play the Halo 5 / Naughty Dog games :drool:. I guess that's the difference between gaming enthusiasts and people who are just worried about which is better and cheaper to play COD / FIFA on. Both consoles have their pros and cons, and for gamers Sony offers the best deal, they are catering more towards gamer. Microsoft is opening up a little and trying to cater towards more people with more features which increases the price. The price is still reasonable compared to other systems in the past, it isn't as welcoming as the PS4 but I wouldn't call it bad. I mean I payed 400 for a 360, and 600 for a PS3, don't regret either of them and wouldn't consider either of them bad.
-
Yeah, look at history, the Sega Saturn was 100 dollars more than the PS1 and yet you didn't get a fancy Kinect even! It just was a 100 dollars for no real reason. Also the PS1 has far more exclusives, just another example for the pot as to why I don't think the price of the One is BAD. I mean I'm not going to say its awesome or I'm happy with it, but I wouldn't say its bad. Now if they made a kinectless version that was only 40 dollars cheaper, then I would start to complain.
-
I'll believe it when I see it. When it comes to performance, benchmarks, and how games look that is purely speculation. I HIGHLY doubt developers will increase costs just to make the same game look slightly better on one system than the other. And if you are talking "exclusives" than you should be buying both systems anyway. I'd also like to note that all this talk about over-priced, and performance, and hardware, is all kind of daft. I would gladly pay 100, 200, or even 300 dollars more for a system if that system had a plethora of better exclusive titles. Look at the Vita, that piece of hardware IS BEYOND BRILLIANT, the software sucks.
-
Have you seen performance differences? Please show me them. Benchmarks? Where? Console games are always just ports, the performance differences will NOT matter at all. Even then the hardware differences are small regardless. Dark Souls lagged more on PS3 than Xbox despite PS3 being "more powerful" (though it lagged bad on both systems so meh). Must have been misinformed with the installing to the harddrives, this doesn't bother me at all, PS3 did it no big. The Xbox One IS worth it because of Kinect. If you don't want Kinect that isn't anything wrong with the price, it just isn't "for you". That would be like saying the costs of your car isn't worth it because it has heated seats and you won't use them. That isn't a problem with the cost, that is a problem with an extra feature you just don't want. And by your logic, you are saying the only way for the Xbox One to be "worth it" would be if it was not only kinectless, but also cheaper than the PS4... this isn't a fantasy world. We aren't talking about a massive difference in price to features. We are talking about a product that comes with a 100 dollar add on, and the product is 100 dollars more.
-
So because something costs more than its competition it is inherently a bad price point? We aren't talking about something overpriced here, like the 9590 was (kind of still is). I don't think this is true at all. Look at Nvidia. No one complains near as much about "less performance more cost" with Nvidia than they do with this gen of consoles. If you don't want Kinect get a PS4, I fail to see the big deal. Also you have to install your games on both systems, so...
-
pretty sure we are talking about computer though.... not consoles. console graphics performance has never related to pc graphics performance. ala crysis 1, crysis 3, metro 2033, far car 3, etc etc. consoles can run those game, but it takes / took a far more powerful computer than a console to do the same (of course with added benefits such as better details, higher textures, higher resolutions, higher frame rates). Example; Example, Metro Last Light is on Xbox 360 (current gen)... good luck running that game well with a 7770 as you say (and we are talking current gen not even next-gen); A 7850 barely runs it at 30FPS
-
FrozenCPU is brilliant.
-
Where are you getting gpus and blocks that cheap? You said 760 TI Sli + blocks + rads for cheap? Thats; 500 for the GPUS 200 for full cover blocks Thats 700? Pretty expensive. More than the cost of a 780 which is 650. That doesn't take into consideration the fact you need a bigger rad, more tubing, and more fittings either. What prices are you looking at where you are?
