Jump to content

ProKoN

Member
  • Posts

    3,821
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ProKoN

  1. watch the nb frequency in the memory tab when you run the test. it should hit 4400 if you are correct. all the screenies you posted show it at 40x your score is also very low for 4.8
  2. ya not good idea for benchmarking figure out what your best two sticks are and only run those density has no relavence for benchmarking.
  3. can you oc the the fsb or cache in xtu? i dont think H series will let you touch the cache, but stock 40x isnt that bad post a screen shot of your ram plz i think you score low cuz cache is not optimized. an efficient score is 960 at 4.6ghz. can you get that bob?
  4. da fuq the only free parts i get are the ones i pull from the garbage lol your lucky mang thought you went and bought new cooler and i thought "damn this guy is committed" lol. well you got a nice cooler and sweet scores.
  5. mmmm. this video is in the first post...plz subscribe well done out there. did you go to the store today and buy the new cooler?
  6. yep you got er. intel xtu is very very nice software imo benchmark- cinebench r15 and xtu benchmark (quick ways to gauge stability) stress test- p95 8 hours or more plz cpuz is a must for any system
  7. xtu benchmark is alot more resource intensive on the cpu than the xtu stress test. very different tests. the benchmark uses p95 while the stress test uses some weak form of linpack. xtu bench and cinebench are a great way to get started. you get an idea of how stable you are but more importantly they generate a score so you also get an idea of how the system is performing. great way to get started not a proper way to stress for stability.
  8. i personally do not require avx stability on my machines. p95 v21.9 and higher actually stress avx2\fma3 i do believe. honestly if your machine can run like 3 passes of intel xtu benchmark its fairly stable. i still like 24-30 hours of stress testing before i consider my machine "somewhat stable"
  9. ya your right all the rookies think p95 is bad. its fine, run it in manual voltage mode and your fine. I suggest using p95 v21.9 or higher. blend test only. some people just use the 1334 fft to start with, one of the most difficult ffts to run imo small ffts are impractical and should never be run unless your room is cold and you need to increase ambient temps.
  10. its prolly a result of how your mainboard implements offset voltages. set a non offset voltage if 1.15V and see if the behavior is consistent. looks like you did this with aida64 there is really no need to use a voltage offset with haswell. use a straight voltage in adaptive mode.
  11. run cinebench so we know where your at heres my list of tips set core ratio for 34x set cache ratio for 34x enable enhanced turbo if your board has this feature. sometimes different bios revisions have the feature while others do not. flashing bios can be risky so do that at your own risk. make sure your ram is set for its recommended frequency and voltage there is always bclk overclocking to squeeze a bit more performance out of her
  12. pull harder there is no latching mechanism many people screw up this header so be careful try to secure the motherboard plastic housing while you tug it or maybe try to pry it up with a flat blade, just be very careful ok
  13. nice job out there at least when your done pushing her hard and you dial it back a bit your pc will be running faster. all because you posted your first score here and your lucky the community offers fantastically, friendly, helpful peoples
  14. yes im with you. it was the retailer not the oem. i think we all know that
  15. should we boycott gskill? is their image tarnished? couple rubber bands is completely trivial. i would understand if maybe you received a new item wrapped in newspaper and didnt have any anti-static protection. gskill makes great products at competitive pricing and offers excellent support sorry for my ignorance, this thread makes me want to give up on the internet..
×