Minorika

yes
It was the cabling.
i didn't get any more shutdowns after connecting the gpu with 2 separate  cables

yes
It was the cabling.
i didn't get any more shutdowns after connecting the gpu with 2 separate  cables

Did you use 2 separate PCie cables to power your GPU ? Else GPU may trip with only 1 power source at max 150W, or a bit more, +75W for the Pcie slot, when it needs 350W 

That's because the PSU is set as multi rail 12v and a single cable triggers the OCP on the 12v rail the GPU is connected to. With 2 cables the GPU is connected to 2 seperate 12v rails. In iCUE you can set the PSU to single rail 12v that prevents the PSU to shut down with a single cable. But 2 seperate cables is a better solution.

If it requires physically swapping the individual flash chips then it's not really "upgradeable".

Yeah CS:GO is such an obscure and unpopular game. 

future proof is actually a good thing (with moderation)
 
strawberry in cheeseburger taste good, you taste the patty, then the sweet and slight sour of strawberry to cleanse pallate, then the patty again, it's amazing honestly.
i only found out because me and my friend joked about it but i tried it for real.

This is me:

 
 

the main problem with the ryzen models from my experience is the sticker is crooked driving me insane
 

obviously an unpopular opinion, but its a free product. Its intended to bring users onboard their platform, not just provide a free service indefinitely. I personally don't any problem with the company doing this as its most definitely in their rights to do so, and users can still export their data and move to a different product if they wish. If they also restricted the export of data this would obviously be a different case, but so far I dont see any issue. 

IMO it's deserved. They clearly knew what they were trying to do. The saying of "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" really rings true here.

I like this approach he's been doing.  Typically I'm not the biggest fan of a bunch of exec orders, but Biden has been trying this approach of lets at least try, fucking anything at this point.  It's a good approach for right now, at least something is being attempted to make things better.  It's much better than doing nothing or even actively being malicious and trying to ruin something. I doubt this will do too much to help, but it's an attempt being made. 

i appreciate this "new deal" style approach lately of "don't know if this'll work but we'll try something"

true AF
my sister had an important test today and internet went down more then 5 times in just 1 hour
and my family just keep blaming me for not being able to fix it because I'm a software engineer and they think everything is my fault and the only person that can fix electronics is me
the main internet data center in Iran is located in Milad Tower (a skyscraper at the heart of Tehran) and internet has been connecting and disconnecting multiple time since yesterday because of power shortage
also taxes and electricity bill is cheap compare to other country's
not us
and unfortunately we stock in this rabbit hole
sorry for my English

Magnetic Secure Transmission

Yes

so that's what's in the prompt i accepted earlier

Unions, particularly trade unions, are viewed by corporate America as something Extremely Evil(TM) for their association with dictatorial politics. True, they have been abused by communists, and still are in a way in certain countries, but on the whole, unions are for the better of the company. You need to look no further then Scandinavia, Germany and the Low Countries to see what non-militant trade unions can achieve to further the position of employees while still take in account the needs of the company they work for. Their agreements are based on consensus, mutual respect and a strong sense of joint responsibility for not just the existence of the company but also society as a whole. The Anglo-Saxon model based on egocentric greed and implied disrespect for subordinates doesn't fly here. The economic results speak for themselves: it works

Everyone raving how they won't miss Adobe Flash at all and dismissing it was a method that for years delivered video content to the masses and provided endless hours of enjoyment through games and animations it helped create. It was also a method of creating insanely rich and visually appealing webpages that were just not possible through HTML at the time.
 
Just because it didn't age well in its final stage of lifecycle, that doesn't mean Adobe Flash didn't push online content to new heights. HTML5 literally replaced it because it copied its functionality without being dependent on 3rd party plugin and it's now an integral part of browser engines. So, people who diss and dismiss Adobe Flash just to look cool are annoying fools. Without Adobe Flash, I don't think we'd evolve HTML the way it has.

Someone, somewhere, is a damn hero. But that same someone, at that same somewhere, is gonna get their ass(es) kicked by Nintendo. I just hope they stuff their pants with pillows first.
lttstore.com

Given I'm a hoarding hamster in RPG games, this could be a legit issue for me. Luckily I'm waiting to first get the damn RTX 3080 card and then buy the game. Given availability of said cards, the game should be fixed when I get the card.

I spent weeks trying to get my RTX 3080, and I was seriously about to go after an RX 6800 XT or 6900 XT with the intention of selling my 3080. Hardware Unboxed's review of the 3080 is what helped me decide to buy it, and I could not in good faith continue to support a company that was this petty towards a reviewer who, in all honesty, gave the RTX 3080 a glowing endorsement.

I'm glad Nvidia backtracked on this. When will these companies learn... the Internet is a living thing, and if you piss it off, it will eat you.

I disagree. Reviewers should be free to review a product any way they want. A company should have no say about it in any way. Otherwise reviews are nothing more than another form of advertisement, making them useless for their intended purpose.
 
I also think it's a contradiction to ask for objective reviews and at the same time say a company should be free to object to their products being reviewed a certain way. That's not an objective review then. That's them being a company mouthpiece, censoring what they have to say on orders from the company.

I don't think that needs to have its own  dedicated channel. Just the occasional video.
 
Besides,  given the examples provided, there are thousands of videos just like it, no need for LMG to make one as well.
 
LMG/LTT doesn't need to be the go to for everything tech related. I would rather some smaller creators have a chance of getting views if its something they specialise in.