Brooksie359

Yeah my thought are similar in the sense that people who know coding can use AI to write code or parts of code to speed up their process. All of that said you still need to learn coding to use it effectively making Nvidia's CEOs statements super dumb imo. I mean I don't think AI changes how much code your colleague has to know. 

I usually pick monitors based on what I want and what I plan to play not my hardware. Obviously money is also a factor to keep in mind but I do find that people often times will limit their monitor purchase to what their system can use to the fullest 100% of the time which isn't realistic. I mean anyone who buys a 360hz 1440p monitor isn't realistically going to run it at 360 fps in all games at 1440p but the point is that if you need 360hz then you have it. Also most people keep monitors for quite a while so chances are that a monitor could last multiple system hardware upgrades that could potentially make further use of the monitor. 

Again depending on what you are doing the difference can be barely or pretty noticeable but not massive. Like for overwatch the difference is not something I would necessarily describe as barely. I mean if you are super into overwatch then the difference is definitely meaniful even though it isn't huge. Then again if you were that into overwatch you might opt for a 360 or even 540hz monitor at that point. 

Having more options for fabs is great especially because right now companies are so reliant on TSMC that it would be a very scary situation if something happened to tsmc or its supply chain. 

Having more options for fabs is great especially because right now companies are so reliant on TSMC that it would be a very scary situation if something happened to tsmc or its supply chain. 

Having more options for fabs is great especially because right now companies are so reliant on TSMC that it would be a very scary situation if something happened to tsmc or its supply chain. 

That's a terrible set of recommendations at least without mentioning the major caveats of each of them.

Having more options for fabs is great especially because right now companies are so reliant on TSMC that it would be a very scary situation if something happened to tsmc or its supply chain. 

Having more options for fabs is great especially because right now companies are so reliant on TSMC that it would be a very scary situation if something happened to tsmc or its supply chain. 

For the most part you are looking at ips panels with local diming if you want HDR that isn't oled. Honestly though I would check out hardware unboxed or their side channel monitors unboxed as they do a ton of monitor reviews that have a ton of useful information. Also they have monitor roundup videos where they go over top picks for each type of monitor and I believe they have done many of such videos going over their top picks for HDR monitors. 

Having more options for fabs is great especially because right now companies are so reliant on TSMC that it would be a very scary situation if something happened to tsmc or its supply chain. 

Having more options for fabs is great especially because right now companies are so reliant on TSMC that it would be a very scary situation if something happened to tsmc or its supply chain. 

Because it just works. What is wrong with it other than it looks old? And how would a new one fix that?
 
And the beta one is everything I hate about modern UI design.

We asked for better NVIDIA Control Panel, not more NVIDIA Experience bulls**t shoehorned into it. Sigh. I don't want stupid NVIDIA Experience and its stupid "library" and its stupid "optimizations".
 
We've gone from "This archaic control panel looks like it escaped from 2004" to "Just let me use the old archaic control panel that escaped from 2004)...
 
And I bet the interface will have all the stupid problems old one has, like descriptions being wonky, applying things being wonky, settings list jumping to the top on every selection etc... Because that just seems to be the NVIDIA way. They are the Apple of graphic cards...

Honestly I think the AK620 is a super good option for most people and if you need anything more than that you likely want an AIO anyways. Pretty sure the AK620 has similar temps as the D15 if I remember correctly. 

The hyperx cloud II actually is decent for other things like music and other stuff. Not as good as audiophile headphones but I would hardly say they have bad sound quality like I have had with other gaming headsets. Also I think it was harder to make out stuff in the HD600 due 0 noise isolation and me not having a quiet ambient noise maybe it would have worked better if I was in a completely quite room but unfortunately that isn't going to happen.

Yeah that isn't a sound counter argument. It would be dumb to assume that Apple or any company would need to advertise practices just because some people don't like them. Also you are ascribing intent of them locking down their OS to purposefully trying to be anticompetitive and leverage their market position. The glaring issue with that assertion is that Apple has had a design philosophy of having a uniform locked down experience for various reason even before they had a significant market share to even leverage. They have also stated the reasons for that design philosophy and some people like that philosophy and buy Apple products because of it. Also asking for 30% cut is pretty typical in the industry so I would hardly say that is extortion and it is disingenuous to say they are making use of their position to overcharge when using that industry standard rate. If Apple was asking for 40% or more then I could understand people complaining that Apple is using their control of their os to extort app developers. 

Price can be accounted for but for some it isn't really a factor. If you are mostly concerned about performance then the price might not matter too much if you can easily afford the high cost of a 4090. 

You could get the HyperX Cloud II, they have a mic but you can unplug it. This way you would have a backup should you ever need it.

Personally I think having subscriptions as an option is good. I still think owning games should always be an option but subscription services is a nice option sorta like how video subscription services is also a pretty good option for alot of people. I do think subscription services is super nice for games you only plan to play once and then be done with it. 

That is completely out of context quote and not that I don't dislike ubisofts actions but people make it out like he is saying something he is not. If I remember correctly that quote is in context of what is holding back people from adopting subscriptions based services like Microsoft game pass, EA play and ubisoft+. It was never meant to be a statement saying gamers should be ok with not owning games as he even said how he understands the sentiment as someone who likes owning movies rather than subscription based video services. I think the gist of what was said is that subscription based services are a very good alternative that some might prefer or should consider as they have their own unique value which I think he has a point as game pass is pretty cool for those who it makes sense for. All of that said it was incredibly ironic when he stated that people shouldn't be afraid of losing access to a game services just because you don't own the game when his company has basically done that for games people do own so maybe he does have a point because you lose access regardless. 

I am confused why anyone would sell a system for that cheap. I would be suspicious if a deal looks too good to be true honestly.

I don't know. I knew a person who was basically a Sociopath in terms of not understanding empathy. Did some horrible stuff and didn't even know it was wrong. Admitted to everything and was confused as to why he was in trouble. I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't a similar situation or some other reason that has little to do with book smarts. 

Just up some settings and then no more cpu bottleneck. Problem solved. Unless you are getting bad performance in game I wouldn't worry about such a minor bottleneck. 

Just up some settings and then no more cpu bottleneck. Problem solved. Unless you are getting bad performance in game I wouldn't worry about such a minor bottleneck.