-
Posts
51 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
-
cozz got a reaction from ARikozuM in CRTC (Canada) bans cellhpones unlocking fees
In Australia I pay $85 month for a
Samsung Galaxy S7
7GB of data
Unlimited calls and texts
100 minutes of international calls
The Australian and Canadian dollar are pretty much identical.
-
cozz got a reaction from Megah3rtz in $64 Pentium G4560 is neck and neck against i5-2500K
ComputerBases's performance review on the new Pentium G4560($64USD) shows that it's total performance is neck and neck w/ the i5-2500K($230USD)
Gaming at 720p and 1080p the Kaby Lakes-based pentium G4560 beats the Pentium G440, FX-6300 and A10-7890K - while just 5% slower than the more expenisve Corey i3-6100 and Core i5-2500K processors.
source; TweakTown
Benchmark Results; ComputerBase
-
cozz got a reaction from kelvinhall05 in $64 Pentium G4560 is neck and neck against i5-2500K
ComputerBases's performance review on the new Pentium G4560($64USD) shows that it's total performance is neck and neck w/ the i5-2500K($230USD)
Gaming at 720p and 1080p the Kaby Lakes-based pentium G4560 beats the Pentium G440, FX-6300 and A10-7890K - while just 5% slower than the more expenisve Corey i3-6100 and Core i5-2500K processors.
source; TweakTown
Benchmark Results; ComputerBase
-
cozz got a reaction from mromutt in $64 Pentium G4560 is neck and neck against i5-2500K
ComputerBases's performance review on the new Pentium G4560($64USD) shows that it's total performance is neck and neck w/ the i5-2500K($230USD)
Gaming at 720p and 1080p the Kaby Lakes-based pentium G4560 beats the Pentium G440, FX-6300 and A10-7890K - while just 5% slower than the more expenisve Corey i3-6100 and Core i5-2500K processors.
source; TweakTown
Benchmark Results; ComputerBase
-
cozz got a reaction from NorthHopper in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Laptops and NUCs, which IMO is worse than desktops.
-
cozz got a reaction from NorthHopper in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Positive Technologies, a security vendor has discovered that some of Intel's new CPUs have a debugging interface that can be accessed through USB 3.0 ports. This provides the hacker full control over the PC. Worse yet, it is completely undetectable by current security tools.
TweakTown's Anthony Garreffa stated "The possibilities of this are virtually unlimited, as someone could plug a USB 3.0 stick in and upload malicious code, keyloggers, and virtually anything else they wanted"
Maxim Goryachy at the 33rd Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg Germany said: "We have reported this case to Intel, As of today this mechanism can be exploited only on Intel U-series processors. As of today, no publicly available security system will detect it."
Source; TweakTown
-
cozz got a reaction from rattacko123 in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Laptops and NUCs, which IMO is worse than desktops.
-
cozz reacted to anybodykek in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Intel is CIA confirmed!!! Make SURE to buy my GENUINE CPU FILTER! THEY'RE INJECTING MICROCODE IN THE USBs THAT TURN THE FROGS GAY AS A METHOD OF POPULATION CONTROL!!!!
-
cozz got a reaction from anotherriddle in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Laptops and NUCs, which IMO is worse than desktops.
-
cozz got a reaction from matrix07012 in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Laptops and NUCs, which IMO is worse than desktops.
-
cozz got a reaction from Belgarathian in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
You got me there
-
cozz got a reaction from jagdtigger in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Laptops and NUCs, which IMO is worse than desktops.
-
cozz got a reaction from anotherriddle in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Positive Technologies, a security vendor has discovered that some of Intel's new CPUs have a debugging interface that can be accessed through USB 3.0 ports. This provides the hacker full control over the PC. Worse yet, it is completely undetectable by current security tools.
TweakTown's Anthony Garreffa stated "The possibilities of this are virtually unlimited, as someone could plug a USB 3.0 stick in and upload malicious code, keyloggers, and virtually anything else they wanted"
Maxim Goryachy at the 33rd Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg Germany said: "We have reported this case to Intel, As of today this mechanism can be exploited only on Intel U-series processors. As of today, no publicly available security system will detect it."
Source; TweakTown
-
cozz got a reaction from jagdtigger in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Positive Technologies, a security vendor has discovered that some of Intel's new CPUs have a debugging interface that can be accessed through USB 3.0 ports. This provides the hacker full control over the PC. Worse yet, it is completely undetectable by current security tools.
TweakTown's Anthony Garreffa stated "The possibilities of this are virtually unlimited, as someone could plug a USB 3.0 stick in and upload malicious code, keyloggers, and virtually anything else they wanted"
Maxim Goryachy at the 33rd Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg Germany said: "We have reported this case to Intel, As of today this mechanism can be exploited only on Intel U-series processors. As of today, no publicly available security system will detect it."
Source; TweakTown
-
cozz got a reaction from Belgarathian in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Laptops and NUCs, which IMO is worse than desktops.
-
cozz got a reaction from Qub3d in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Positive Technologies, a security vendor has discovered that some of Intel's new CPUs have a debugging interface that can be accessed through USB 3.0 ports. This provides the hacker full control over the PC. Worse yet, it is completely undetectable by current security tools.
TweakTown's Anthony Garreffa stated "The possibilities of this are virtually unlimited, as someone could plug a USB 3.0 stick in and upload malicious code, keyloggers, and virtually anything else they wanted"
Maxim Goryachy at the 33rd Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg Germany said: "We have reported this case to Intel, As of today this mechanism can be exploited only on Intel U-series processors. As of today, no publicly available security system will detect it."
Source; TweakTown
-
cozz got a reaction from Dabombinable in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Laptops and NUCs, which IMO is worse than desktops.
-
cozz got a reaction from Pheelo in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Positive Technologies, a security vendor has discovered that some of Intel's new CPUs have a debugging interface that can be accessed through USB 3.0 ports. This provides the hacker full control over the PC. Worse yet, it is completely undetectable by current security tools.
TweakTown's Anthony Garreffa stated "The possibilities of this are virtually unlimited, as someone could plug a USB 3.0 stick in and upload malicious code, keyloggers, and virtually anything else they wanted"
Maxim Goryachy at the 33rd Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg Germany said: "We have reported this case to Intel, As of today this mechanism can be exploited only on Intel U-series processors. As of today, no publicly available security system will detect it."
Source; TweakTown
-
cozz got a reaction from Shahnewaz in Intel's new CPUs are vulnerable to USB hacks
Laptops and NUCs, which IMO is worse than desktops.
-
cozz got a reaction from goodtofufriday in AMD's RX 480 hits half the performance of a Titan X (Pascal) at 8K resolution
These scores are purely just to show what a card can push out, of course no one is going to play at 8K right now, you can't even hit 20 frames, not playable at all, but it just shows where our current cards place.
-
cozz got a reaction from 8uhbbhu8 in AMD's RX 480 hits half the performance of a Titan X (Pascal) at 8K resolution
TweakTown has just released benchmarks of Gears of War 4 at a whopping resolution of 7680x2160 (8K)
As you can see in the graph below the RX 480 hits half the performance of NVIDIA's pascal based Titan X, which is fucking insane considering the Titan X costs 5 times more.
Original Article here
-
cozz got a reaction from rn8686 in AMD's RX 480 hits half the performance of a Titan X (Pascal) at 8K resolution
TweakTown has just released benchmarks of Gears of War 4 at a whopping resolution of 7680x2160 (8K)
As you can see in the graph below the RX 480 hits half the performance of NVIDIA's pascal based Titan X, which is fucking insane considering the Titan X costs 5 times more.
Original Article here
-
cozz got a reaction from matrix07012 in AMD's RX 480 hits half the performance of a Titan X (Pascal) at 8K resolution
TweakTown has just released benchmarks of Gears of War 4 at a whopping resolution of 7680x2160 (8K)
As you can see in the graph below the RX 480 hits half the performance of NVIDIA's pascal based Titan X, which is fucking insane considering the Titan X costs 5 times more.
Original Article here
-
cozz got a reaction from Belgarathian in AMD's RX 480 hits half the performance of a Titan X (Pascal) at 8K resolution
TweakTown has just released benchmarks of Gears of War 4 at a whopping resolution of 7680x2160 (8K)
As you can see in the graph below the RX 480 hits half the performance of NVIDIA's pascal based Titan X, which is fucking insane considering the Titan X costs 5 times more.
Original Article here