Jump to content

Jon Jon

Member
  • Posts

    1,192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jon Jon

  1. If you want 144hz at 1440P, I would argue that an RTX 2080 Super or TI is where you want to go. An RTX 2070 Super or RX 5700 XT may be able to satisfy if you don't mind running at medium settings. I wouldn't go below that though. Definitely a "spare no expense" target resolution and refresh rate.
  2. I think waiting for the RX 5500 isn't a bad idea. Plus, we are month out from Black Friday / Cyber Monday, so I would suggest holding out. If you can't, you really can't beat what the RX 580s are going for on sale right now.
  3. Honestly, Minecraft with shaders is just a bear. I was just talking to my buddy who runs a 5820K OC to 4.5ghz and and he just upgraded to an RTX 2080ti and he still can struggle at times with it. It is just how it is. I'd suggest if you want to stream and get into content creation, just get the RTX 2070S at the minimum as the NVENC for streaming is pretty amazing, RTX is the best for video content creation right now, and you want as much performance as you can get for running Minecraft with shaders.
  4. The fact that you are still happy with your R9 390 makes it hard to recommend even upgrading. Something that would feel like an upgrade would have to be a Vega / RTX / Navi card. I always recommend looking at Pugent's benchmarks for teh suite of applications that you run. I have a feeling for $400, an RTX 2060S would actually be the best, as that is what I would recommend, but I am also used to dealing with people that primarily run the Adobe suite. CUDA is well supported and the Turing NVENC is leaps and bounds better than what AMD has, especially with Navi being such a cluster with VCE support currently (even though it is actually better hardware wise than what Vega and Polaris have). After looking into it: https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Premiere-Pro-GPU-Roundup-NVIDIA-SUPER-vs-AMD-RX-5700-XT-1564/ https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Does-PCIe-Gen4-improve-GPU-performance-in-video-editing-apps-1565/ The above two articles actually showcase that the RX 5700XT is faster than Vega, but a little slower than Radeon VII, but the RTX 2060S is overall better in the main suite of applications. I highly recommend the RTX 2060S. It will be slower than a 5700XT in games, but it will be faster in everything else that you do.
  5. Sadly it isn't really worth it to bother IMO. I think it's great people can do it, but we are in a good spot as the AIB 5700XTs that are close to MSRP are rock solid, so it's hard to justify spending $30-$50 less and taking the risk of flashing. I do see you recommending Navi all over the place, but it is hard for me to disagree with you. Now that I've ironed out the weird quirks with the current drivers, I am more than happy with the card. It is easily choked by my Ryzen 7 1700 at the resolution I play for high refresh rate. Grabbing the Sapphire Pulse or Power Color Red Dragon for $400-$420 is such a steal for the performance you get.
  6. Faster RAM is more CPU limited than not with Ryzen. One of the other guys on here is even running on an X370 board with no issues. Pairing that and a 5700XT would easily yield 10-20% more performance, which if he wants to run ultra, he will want it. EDIT: It will require a bit more research of course.
  7. I would honestly suggest saving on the X570 board and going for a B450. Use that savings and spring for DDR4-3600 RAM and bumping up to a 5700XT Red Dragon or Pulse.
  8. I second this. Really, the RTX 2060S is is only worth it if you are doing content creation tasks. I keep my buddy on NVIDIA strictly because he does a lot of work in Adobe After Effects and Premiere. NVIDIA support is simply better for those applications. If he were upgrading from the GTX 1060 I stuck him on a year and a half ago, I would have him go with either a 2060S or spring for the 2070S. An RX 5700 would be out of the question.
  9. the RX 5700 XT is a way better buy, but make sure you have the proper connections. I know my Strix has dual 8-pin power connections.
  10. Jon Jon

    Well folding rig rebuilt yet again. Was in an A…

    My buddy is still running an X99 platform rig. I believe is he running a 5820K at 4.5ghz and just upgraded his 980ti to an RTX 2080ti because he bought a 4K TV. Funny enough, he tells me that even with that card, it still struggles with handling Minecraft with shaders.
  11. Jon Jon

    Well folding rig rebuilt yet again. Was in an A…

    @Zando Bob, I get you, I am the same. I still have my $1800 2005 beast gaming rig that is dead at my uncle's house, as well as a shuttle I built as well that was a good HTPC for the time. I also have my Core i5-3570 build from 2012 still hanging around because I have my ASUS Xonar Essence ST in there, so that is my primary music listening rig. Now I have my current rig, which will ultimately become a Plex/Streaming box when the time comes that I want to build a new rig that is exclusively for gaming. It's why I mention getting a Quadro when the time comes. That thing will chew threw both Plex and Streaming tasks without breaking a sweat, and my Ryzen 7 will be able to pick up anything additional without any issues. I have a Be Quiet Silent Case that this is all in and my Noctua D15, really the only thing you can ever hear in the case remotely is my graphics card, but the STRIX 5700XT is way quieter than my Red Dragon RX 580 ever was. I could just save and put the two RX 580s I own into it, but I am also pretty tempted to eventually migrate them into my i5-3570 build and turn that box into a premiere Windows 7 gaming PC, for the titles that actually supported Crossfire. Eventually, those games won't run well on modern OS, similar to what I've seen with many XP games (which I plan to resurrect my high school machine for).
  12. Jon Jon

    Well folding rig rebuilt yet again. Was in an A…

    @Zando Bob, test the settings for yourself when it comes to streaming with the Radeon VII. I honestly thought my RX 580 put out decent enough quality. When you pump out higher bitrate, it becomes good enough. I don't think a side grade is worth it JUST for that. Though I really like the Turing NVENC, for the price, you could just build a second rig for streaming and get far better performance. I am actually tempted, to do that. My current rig will probably become a dedicated streaming/plex server when I am ready for a new build. At that point, I'd be getting a Quadro. I think it is a great idea for you to do some walkthroughs / guides. Really, 1080P is plenty for stuff like that.
  13. Jon Jon

    Well folding rig rebuilt yet again. Was in an A…

    Ah you are young! Makes me think of my buddy's kid brother (He and I have been close since kindergaren, so I've known his brother his whole life, he is 21 now) and he just got into this stuff. Stuff today is just so bullet proof. He is constantly investing in his PC, his Rift, audio mixing equipment, etc. It wasn't uncommon back then to get product that was DOA. The only stuff that was bullet proof were CPUs. Not uncommon to have to boot into memtest via CD and see memory failed fresh from packaging. Same for hard drives. Same for motherboards. Power Supplies were pretty bullet proof back then IF you bought from a reputable manufacturer, but even then, not like today. I think your 4K idea is a great one. I actually own an Elgato HD60 Pro and love it, the 4K one is apparently amazing. Honestly, I think an RTX card would save you on compute since the Turing NVENC is so good that you can leverage that to give your 5960X a break. I am finding that with my OC Ryzen 7 1700 that I am starting to see FPS impact when streaming exclusively with CPU when playing modern AAA titles. This wasn't the case two years ago. You can easily clone a display to the HDMI out into a 4K capture card, or just daisy chain out to the same monitor, at the cost of adaptive sync.
  14. Jon Jon

    Well folding rig rebuilt yet again. Was in an A…

    Maybe I am showing my age (30), but I remember a time when I was a teenager and static electricity frying things was an actual problem. Just force of habit at this point!
  15. Jon Jon

    Well folding rig rebuilt yet again. Was in an A…

    On the carpet...living dangerously I see.
  16. You know, I was just playing Hitman over the weekend and was thinking about that when walking passed mirrors. I think the marketing machine from NVIDIA really are trying to drive that these things either never existed, or looked like garbage before they started pushing ray tracing. I also noticed that there are zero reflections in puddles in BFV when playing through the campaign, and wondered why, since I can remember in games over a decade ago having reflections in puddles and water. Thank you for making me feel less crazy.
  17. I would argue the Sapphire Pulse and the Power Color Red Dragon are your best value variants. The Gigabyte version is also apparently really good. If you really want to push the card, go for the Red Devil or Nitro +. If you want to be like me and just go for the gold, I went with the Strix and I am more than happy with it, but you are paying the ASUS tax for it.
  18. I would recommend looking into the Sapphire Pulse as that should fit, though come pretty close: Dimensions: 254 x 135 x 46.5 https://www.sapphiretech.com/en/consumer/pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt-8g-gddr6
  19. Any of the EVGA cards will do you well and not break the bank.
  20. This video reminds me of a comment you made in another thread that I made where you said you don't play games with ray tracing enabled. It totally mirrors that, which is why I have decided to not really care about ray tracing until I can play games with it enabled at high fps without spending over $1000 :). As for the op, a GTX 980Ti can game at 4K fine still. You can also take advantage of Freesync now, so definitely take a look at Freesync capable monitors, or take the plunge and get G-Sync for when your frames do dip.
  21. I would contact Acer and make a warranty claim. How old is the laptop?
  22. The GTX 1660. Plus, you get the new Turing NVENC in it, which for anyone even remotely interested in game streaming and Plex, makes it worth it.
  23. I agree with others here. I don't think the RX 590 is worth it unless it is super on sale, especially when RX 580s and RX 570s can be had for $170 or less. If you are considering an RX 590, you might as well consider a GTX 1660 and 1660ti. You also get that really great Turing NVENC with it.
  24. As a fellow Strix owner, I am surprised you can even hear the card in your case. I highly recommend running the latest version of 19.10.1 I noticed with playing with issues with my card, they did release a new variant of it on October 17th. vSync has issues, so I just set it to always off in Global Game Settings and just rely on Freesync, which has fixed all of my stuttering problems (with the exception of the cutscenes in BFV). The only real issues I have at this point or the occasional screen flicker on my ultra wide, but a reboot typically fixes that. As for the Strix card, I have had some buggy issues with overclocking with the drivers, so I do not recommend that in the slightest. If you are playing with fan curves, core clock, etc, I recommend that you just download Asus's GPU Tweak to do that. You can just set it to Silent mode from there and be done with it. @MahtXL, how are you doing with the card now?
×