I noticed AMD included console gamers in their "how many people play games on Radeon GPUs" figure.
Is it really fair to include that when console gamers don't have a choice in the hardware and they can't use the product AMD was showing that day? I'm pretty sure console gamers don't buy console hardware because it has AMD in it
-
yeah a bit unfair, but you also gotta consider that while the gamers don't have a choice, the console maker does have a choice. So in a sense if console X uses AMD, that means Company X beleives them to be better for gaming (or better for their purpose moneywise). I think it should count, but I think it should be a separate graph and taken with a grain of salt
-
Non-serious rebuttal: "But SoCs don't have 'real' GPUs so they don't count."
-
they do... polaris based even.
I think i only have one nvidia power console in my house...