Jump to content

DeanS

Member
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    DeanS got a reaction from Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Yay or Nah?
  2. Like
    DeanS got a reaction from Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Got myself some old parts, i must say, for $300 its pretty sweet.
  3. Funny
    DeanS reacted to Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    as the guy from tech city says turbo noobs  
  4. Like
    DeanS got a reaction from Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Went better than expected, office PC i3 3220, real time priority.
  5. Like
    DeanS got a reaction from GollyGee in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Got myself some old parts, i must say, for $300 its pretty sweet.
  6. Agree
    DeanS reacted to Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    yes i think you do to avoid crying when 8 core ryzens scores start pouring in  
  7. Agree
    DeanS got a reaction from done12many2 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    That is some great improvements, but cinebench's GPU bench cannot be taken seriously, I had my GTX 570 w/ X5690 @ 4.8GHz got me 131fps, upgraded to 980ti KPE but w/ i7 860 @ 4.2GHz only got me about 80fps.
  8. Agree
    DeanS got a reaction from Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Do you have tweaks control over the uncore clocks? My experience is that tweaking the uncore clock will raise your score quite abit for 1366s, should help you get pass 1000cb.
  9. Like
    DeanS got a reaction from Lays in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    I didnt know that would work, plus the ram timings.  Im only at 2000 c8 but already smilling.
  10. Like
    DeanS reacted to Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Phase, not even tryin yet  


  11. Funny
    DeanS got a reaction from done12many2 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Fair enough, we want the temps though, i wish you tomorrow cold as hell.
  12. Agree
    DeanS reacted to Simon771 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    If I'm not mistaken, i7 7700k doesn't ned that much voltage to go beyond 5GHz. I saw that a lot of users can get even to 5,1 and 5,2GHz at 1,4V. And that's kinda safe for daily usage.
    I would probbably settle for 5,0GHz at 1,3 - 1,35V if temps would be okay ... don't need more than that power for any games lol
     
    So 1,7V on i7 7700k should give pretty decent OC, if not near 6GHz.
  13. Agree
    DeanS reacted to Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    if asrock bring out an ocf where we can change the microcode maybe. i'm just waiting for ryzen to come out in the hope that intel will drop the price when they get 0 sales for Q2.  
  14. Like
    DeanS reacted to done12many2 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Binned by yours truly.  Still trying to figure it out, but its a start.
     
     

     

  15. Informative
    DeanS got a reaction from Ray_ in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Well thats just sad, whenever i see clocks above 6 i drool, never got passed 5.2, could it be because i do not have sub temps? Seems like im at a lost here, AGAIN...
    You can find his bench score on hwbot :P, and take his advice, oc to the max at under 1.4v, shouldnt give you any problem even on longevity. then work on tightening ram timings, that way you will get a snappier system, which is what i think makes the most difference for daily usage.
  16. Like
    DeanS reacted to Ray_ in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    sync all cores to " 4000mhz " , 1.217v
    2112 cb .

  17. Informative
    DeanS got a reaction from Ray_ in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    That's somewhat off the point here i think,
    If you do mild overclocking you will get slight performance increase, if you do higher overclocking then you would gain more; but then it will be the same problem, as no one can actually precisely tell you when it will die or by how much faster your CPU is degrading when you overclock it, and therefore comes up with a formula to calculate if it is worth while to overclock your expensive processor there.
     
    The suggestion i gave was very specifically meant for rendering task only, to use distributed rendering, where you would have a workstation controlling multiple network render nodes which could be as cheap as dual 1366s, but offering the benefits of not having your workstation doing all the rendering, thus giving you freedom to do other work or whatever you desire with your workstation while the nodes render the said frame. The idea behind all of this is to cut down cost and multiply performance :
    Lets say you have your 6950x workstation which would score some 1900cb, ofcz it would beat dual x5650s who would only get 1300cb. But for the price of your processor, you might be able to put together 3 or more of these 1300cb systems, link them together to your LAN and have them work on a single render frame, the result will be dramatic. Although bear in mind that because of latency issues its only wise to do so on large and demanding projects otherwise lag will outweigh the benefits altogether. Also if they are that cheap you wouldnt really worry if they breakdown bcz spare parts are very very cheap.
     
    So, should you overclock your processor? Personally i would say why not because i would love to find out how far i can push the CPU, but not everyone would think the same, the decision is yours really. Result wise you can go to hwbot.org to find out.
  18. Like
    DeanS reacted to Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    I would recommend overclocking that.  It's pretty slow. 
  19. Like
    DeanS got a reaction from Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    My X5690 died, currently stuck with this, heres the bench it gets.
     

  20. Like
  21. Like
    DeanS reacted to SmashinMachine in Coolermaster Mastercase 5 Glass window   
    It is ddarkened tempered glass....

  22. Like
    DeanS got a reaction from iHardware Shelden in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Update update!!
     
    Played with the uncore somewhat, not very sure what i was doing but certainly helped.

     
    Edited, so far the max i can go without getting BSOD.
  23. Like
    DeanS got a reaction from Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Update update!!
     
    Played with the uncore somewhat, not very sure what i was doing but certainly helped.

     
    Edited, so far the max i can go without getting BSOD.
  24. Like
    DeanS got a reaction from Jumper118 in Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**   
    Is it too late now to be posting about 1366s?

  25. Informative
    DeanS got a reaction from MatrixEvo in Folding@Home Install Guide and Links - LinusTechTips_Team - 223518   
    Had the same problem, then i configured the cpu slot threads to use from -1 to 8, pressed save and then cpu started working.
×