PCGuy_5960

Here's a shape comparison with your current mouse, if it's any help:
https://www.rtings.com/mouse/tools/3d-model-shape-compare/steelseries-sensei-ten-vs.-logitech-g703-lightspeed-wireless-gaming-mouse?orientation=3D&overlap=beside
https://www.rtings.com/mouse/tools/3d-model-shape-compare/steelseries-sensei-ten-vs.-razer-basilisk-x-hyperspeed?orientation=3D&overlap=beside

I found a site where they review alot of mice and they have a special search option to find the best mouse that will fit for your hand and grip type, and from all the mice i had in my list the G703 and the Basalisk are recommended.
So now it is just going to be which one will i go for.
https://www.rocketjumpninja.com/mouse-search
 

Maybe the Steelseries Aerox 3 or Steelseries Rival 3 Wireless or the Glorious Model O Wireless then? Of the ones you mentioned the G703 and the Basilisk are the 2 best IMO, but they are very different from the Sensei, so they will definitely take some getting used to.

Impossible to recommend you something ideal without knowing your griptype or your hand size.

The G Pro is nothing like the G703/403. 
It's preference mostly, a lot of people use the G703/403 and have no issues with it.
 
@AirBourne The G Pro Wireless is a bit more expensive usually, but you can find it for a bit less now that the G Pro X Superlight was released. It's much closer to the Steelseries Sensei in terms of shape and size than any of the ones you listed.

What's your hand size and grip style. Also, what are you primarily using the mouse for?

The G Pro is nothing like the G703/403. 
It's preference mostly, a lot of people use the G703/403 and have no issues with it.
 
@AirBourne The G Pro Wireless is a bit more expensive usually, but you can find it for a bit less now that the G Pro X Superlight was released. It's much closer to the Steelseries Sensei in terms of shape and size than any of the ones you listed.

The G Pro is nothing like the G703/403. 
It's preference mostly, a lot of people use the G703/403 and have no issues with it.
 
@AirBourne The G Pro Wireless is a bit more expensive usually, but you can find it for a bit less now that the G Pro X Superlight was released. It's much closer to the Steelseries Sensei in terms of shape and size than any of the ones you listed.

I mean it's exactly what I would expect a REAL phishing attachment to contain: Something too good to be true. The Cyber Security enthusiast in me sees nothing wrong, but at the same time
OOF

Alternate perspective: a real phishing scam would pull no punches in appealing to every emotional weakness, so it would be irresponsible to make your tests weaker. That would only teach people to think "oh, this would be really mean if it were a scam, so it must not be."

We need to track our users data to... *checks notes* ...save small businesses. 
 
bruh

Better is something very subjective, these 2 mice are completely different. The G502 is a non-symmetrical and relatively big mouse with more of a focus on general usage with all the buttons and the infinite scroll wheel. The Model O is a symmetrical and low profile mouse with more of a competitive/fps focus. I'd say a closer comparison is the G Pro Wireless and the Model O Wireless.
 
If you are talking about the wireless performance, then I'd have to go with the G502 purely because of how "battle tested" logitech wireless has been, with many esports pros using logitech wireless in big lans with 0 issues. The wireless performance of the Model O might be equally good, but we can't know for sure until more people have gotten their hands on it, same goes for QC. Logitech does get a lot of flak for double clicking, but in all honesty it's not as big of a deal as some people make it out to be and logitech's customer support is excellent and will usually provide you with a replacement quickly.
 
Just a quick note, 1)Powerplay is kind of a waste of money and overpriced unless you really want wireless charging. 2) If you are looking for the best mouse possible and don't mind waiting a bit, the G Pro X Superlight goes on sale in December and it's definitely worth taking a look at.

Uhh... like, by law? Seems a bit excessive... and there's a loooong list of things I'd require of a website before I get to the dark theme.
 
Also Dark Reader exists.

No.
 
If you want sitewide dark mode, there are extensions that allow that(DarkReader, for example).

Making a dark mode that is actually usable is much harder than you likely think - if you look closely at the day and night themes here on the forum, you'll notice that there's a lot more to it than just inverting the colours. It would be nice if more websites did have a dark theme, but especially for a website as large as GitHub it is a lot of work to create and maintain.

No, websites shouldn't have any requirements, sometimes dark modes can't be implemented due to design choices. No one should be obligated to include features in their websites if they don't want to.