done12many2

Explaining jokes totally doesn't ruin them does it...

Did I forget to carry the 1?

Nobody is bashing anything, it saddens me that people think news should not be reported because they happen to disagree with the contents.

Not sure what those guides are talking about but it's been perfectly safe for me for years.  I do not use pure vinegar, but a mix with mostly water.  I flush my acrylic reservoirs and GPU blocks with a vinegar/water mix all the time.  Once I'm done cycling the vinegar / water mix through the loop, I flush the loop thoroughly with water.
 
 
I retired from the Corps a few years ago myself.  Thanks for your service.
 

As mentioned by @PCGuy_5960, you're generally better off with a manually configured OC.  The auto OCs are getting better, but they are still a long ways off from dialing in an OC as good as you can if you take the time to do it yourself.  In some examples, auto OCs are down right excessive in the amount of voltage they set. 

As mentioned by @PCGuy_5960, you're generally better off with a manually configured OC.  The auto OCs are getting better, but they are still a long ways off from dialing in an OC as good as you can if you take the time to do it yourself.  In some examples, auto OCs are down right excessive in the amount of voltage they set. 

AFAIK you can usually get the same clock speeds with much lower voltage, so most of the time you're better off OCing it yourself. 
 
@done12many2 can tell you more.

So far so good for me at 1.4125, just passed 1352

 
Where did you get this list so i can reference it.

There are quite a few 1600 and 1600X CPUs outscoring yours at MUCH lower clocks so I'm led to believe that your higher clock is a result of weak memory.  This is also in the CPUz screenshot that you provided.   If you run weak timings/clocks on your memory, you can run higher clocks on your core.  At the end of the day, higher CPU clocks won't matter if you can't keep the CPU cycles fed.  
 
It really doesn't matter if you run a CPU at 4.2 GHz or at 3.9 GHz if they output the same amount of work.
 
 

Yeah. I ended up switching because the particular games I played didn't like Ryzen all that much, and because a BIOS update actually caused a reduction in my stable memory speed. I have 3200 MHz memory, but the best I could do on my 1600X was 3066 (any more aggressive timings than the XMP ones were unstable, also), and that aforementioned BIOS update forced me to 2933.
 
So I figured screw it, and got the 8700K.
 
It's pretty good, even though I'm still on the Hyper 212 Evo I used on the 1600X.

Yup, memory pretty much determines your performance. I tried running tighter timings, lower clocks with tighter timings, but no luck, better RAM is needed. And I am not getting new RAM just for benchmarking 

slow
 
i got 1421 with a 1600 at 4.05ghz . at 4.15ghz with 1600x i was at 1478. at 4.2ghz+ you should be over 1500cb EZ

Hey so I'm a bit confused on what increasing the ram timings will do for me. Would it make a significant difference, also I'm still trying to figure this out but lower is better correct?
 
okay so i changed the timings to 14,16,16,16,34 which was a pretty big difference from what it was before i also set the frequency to 4.225 Ghz noticeable differences.

 
okay so i changed the timings to 14,16,16,16,34 which was a pretty big difference from what it was before i also set the frequency to 4.225 Ghz noticeable differences.

German Shepards are the ultimate breed of dog.
 
 
Oh, you meant about the topic. Looks like I'll be picking up a V56 or 64 soonish.

Really they should all be bellow MSRP by now...
 
Got to clear that inventory before launching the next generation.
 
"We totally don't have anything coming out soon so buy these two year old Pascal cards." - Nvidia
"Jensen, I need a new yacht." - shareholders

Hey y'all! 
This is my first attempt at watercooling. Was an interesting, anxiety provoking process with some interesting issues. Like you're not supposed to be able to keep the HDD cage if you have a 360 rad up front. But I managed to make it all work, and there's no leaks!
Components:
i7 5820k OC to 4.4ghz
Asrock x99 Fatal1ty mobo
EVGA 1080ti sc2 32gb
Corsair vengeance ddr4
Intel p900 optane SSD
Samsung 850evo sata SSD
Samsung 970evo nvme SSD
2x 3tb Seagate barracuda hdd
Phanteks enthoo evolv atx tg
Corsair hx1050 psu
 
Waterloop: Ekwb supremacy cpu block
Evga hydro copper gpu block
Ekwb P360 rad S240 rad
Ekwb d5 pump res combo
Ekwb cyrofuel- blood red
Ekwb compression fittings
Xspc ball valve
Primochill 10mm/13mm tubing

List of things California does right:
Internet Privacy That's it.

You could have just said, "I like AMD" and "in the future, shit will be faster."  

You could have just said, "I like AMD" and "in the future, shit will be faster."  

Illustrator is single-core heavy and very few operations use multiple cores (tops at 8 cores), so I prefer the 8700k. If that's too expensive, get the 8600k. Locked 8700 and unlocked 2700x comes behind.

Because 8 fast cores is going to be better than 16 slow ones for the vast majority of workloads.

@done12many2 doesn't have to.
 
If it weren't for custom AR building being as easy as it is, neither would I.

Watch the video.  it has a 5 year expiry, it's a genreic par for the course NDA, it does not contradict any journalistic principals (if such things even exist).   

Seems reasonable. 

Well he did put i7 in his submission. Clearly you should invalidate the whole run.