ohJey

It's all good, I switched to two wheels now 

Yeah I know that. Nice bike you got there
That shit must pop some wheelies like there's no tomorrow

yeah it power wheelies easy   i want to get a short clutch so I can learn to clutch wheelie

Have fun with it hehe

I drove a 80cc dirtbike with a short (chopped) clutch once, you needed to keep it in the higher rpms or it would stall when cold so me being dumb went full throttle and attempted to ease the clutch, my hand slippes off the clutch and i did my first wheelie.... (Luckily i didnt fall because i was only suposed to drive it around a field once and didnt have my riding gear on....)

Insurance? Man that really is unfortunate. People in Cali can be like that.

My friend has a 1993 Impreza wagon that needs a transmission, so I might just have another subaru  

My friend has a 1993 Impreza wagon that needs a transmission, so I might just have another subaru  

my friend totaled his bike 2 days ago lane splitting... luckily he didn't total his life  

That would be cool, wagon sleeper build!
+Its awd so DAT LAUNCH!

Wagon life :3
 

 

 
 
Oh damn.

yeah he was sideswiped and was just bruised up

Lucky! I saw a news article the other day about a guy on a bike Who got his rear wheel tapped by a truckdriver in a tunel, truckdriver felt a bump but couldnt see anything and so he just drove on, someone driving behind the truck saw and called an ambulance for the biker who had both his legs crushed... I like bikes but it sure seems like an easy way to kill yourself with all the morons you encounter on the road (dosent help that you often drive faster and more Reckless on a bike either)

It's all good, I switched to two wheels now 

yeah he was sideswiped and was just bruised up

Idk if you guy remember my car, but this is what's left of it after being stolen

It's all good, I switched to two wheels now 

my friend totaled his bike 2 days ago lane splitting... luckily he didn't total his life  

I am guessing trick question by lecturer to make you dig into it.

An operator cannot defy its function.
 
Quadratic has two answers (in theory).
 
however, if logic flow chart is run via single value, and it is correct, and you put a conditional test on what you are trying to prevent, it will never be wrong, thus the flow chart is incorrect or incomplete.

It can't be that is definitely a logic error. Its also an irrelevant decision because you use the stable formula either way so why bother even asking the question if both branches are identical.

wow... I did 
i = i-number-1 and it worked

Well first step ofc is ofc the -33 so we have (n - 33) rev mod 90  ^ 2
 
Now modulus is just the remainder of the divide, so we know that (n - 33) is what was left from 90 which gives us an infinite amount of possibilities
So now we have (n - 33) + (any of 90's multiples) ^ 2
 
Alright so that's simple enough right? Of course at this point I am taking the piss as you can't reverse a modulus, that's why it's used for hashing http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51619.html
 
Though if you can figure out a way to reverse modulus the hackers of the world will surely thank you  
 
Edit:
 
Basically what this code does is hash the value you enter, not encrypt it a basic explanation can be found here - http://www.securityinnovationeurope.com/blog/whats-the-difference-between-hashing-and-encrypting

It's just the reverse of what you did. So subtract 33, then reverse the modulo (not sure how to do this, may look it up and edit the post) then square root that number, decryption done. 
 
EDIT
There's no way to reverse a modulus operation, as all you're left with is the remainder of the division. So you won't be able to get the original number if you've used a modulus operation, unless you store the number that is being operated with 90. Which defeats the point of the encryption