Jump to content

zeph_solaris

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Agree
    InertiaSelling
    zeph_solaris got a reaction from InertiaSelling in More Intel leaks.. this one is not good though   
    No.  You're still getting a processor that runs on x-architecture at y-clockspeeds.  It's not intel's fault that your operating system may get an update that makes it perform slower.
     
    I'd really like to see all benchmarks redone after these updates go into place to see just how much of a hit tasks of all sorts take.
  2. Informative
    Freeman
    zeph_solaris got a reaction from Freeman in May 19th, 2017 - The WAN Show Document   
    *woosh*
    https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/itanium-9500-massive-parallelism-mission-critical-computing-paper.pdf
     
    Perfectly good jab at an Intel failure right over most people's heads.
  3. Informative
    JCHelios
    zeph_solaris got a reaction from JCHelios in May 19th, 2017 - The WAN Show Document   
    *woosh*
    https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/itanium-9500-massive-parallelism-mission-critical-computing-paper.pdf
     
    Perfectly good jab at an Intel failure right over most people's heads.
×