crispybagel

Corsair HX850i, i have an extra SF750 but the cables are not long enough for my chassis. Ok, will try this.

Hey, my system very recently started acting out. Both monitors lose signal and turn black, system is still running but I can't see if anything else is wrong since both monitors are off. Only way to fix it temporarily is to reboot and even then 1 reboot might not be enough. I restart the system by holding power button, wait 5s and turn back on only to have the system start with no signal to either of the monitors. Once, I've gotten "The VGA card is not supported by UEFI driver" on post. The only recent change that I've made to the system is to turn turn on DOCP, and match BLCK + RAM frequency to 3600MHz. And these issues didn't start appearing until at least 3 weeks after that so I doubt they bear any relation. X570-I Strix ASUS TUF 4080 Ryzen 3900X 2x16GB DDR4 EDIT: I've just now reinstalled the VGA driver, hope it fixes it. EDIT: reinstalling VGA driver changed nothing, just crashed again...

I turned on PBO, DOCP and matched memory and FCLK frequencies, seeing much better results now, closer to 140 fps. Thank you.

Hey, I installed the FPS unlocker mod for Elden Ring a few days ago and I love that there is developers out there doing this kind of stuff for games that force Vsync at 60fps. However, the performance is not as good as I expected it to be. I reach roughly 75-100 fps on 1440p (max settings) with my setup and I've read that that people with similar setups are reaching 60fps at 4K. I've messed around with the settings in-game and they don't seem to be affecting fps more than 5-10. During gameplay I see that GPU-Z logs roughly 30-40% GPU Usage with PerfCap Reason: Idle which I find strange. CPU usage is roughly 20%. No temperature bottlenecks anywhere. Anyone who has experienced similar issues? Is this an ELDEN RING issue? Is there anything I could do that will impact my FPS and get my to higher GPU and CPU usage. Wish I could get it to lock on 165fps. RTX 4080 3900X 32GB RAM

Hi, I'm trying to create a function that navigation links for each new post that is made to a website that i'm creating. I'm having trouble applying the correct href as well as a name to each individual navigation link. This is a short-hand version of the HTML used. <div class="post-container" id="001"> <table class="post-title"> <tr> <th>POST 001: Name</th> </tr> </table> </div> <div class="post-container" id="002"> <table class="post-title"> <tr> <th>POST 002: Name</th> </tr> </table> </div> and the Jquery function function postchecker(){ post = $(".post-container"); $(post).each(function(){ id = "#" + $(this).attr("id"); name = $(this).find(".post-title th").text(); $(".nav-post-wrapper").append('<a class="nav-link" href=""><span></span></a>'); >> Apply the variable "id" as href to the appended element .nav-post-wrapper >> Insert the variable "name" into the span inside the .nav-post-wrapper }); }; How exactly would i go about applying the id and name as described in the code? Can i insert variables directly in to the append() somehow? The appended elements should look like this in the HTML. <a class="nav-link" href="#001"><span>Post 001: Name</span></a> <a class="nav-link" href="#002"><span>Post 002: Name</span></a> etc. EDIT: managed to find a solution, set the append as a variable with id and name like this. function postchecker(){ post = $(".post-container"); $(post).each(function(){ id = "#" + $(this).attr("id"); name = $(this).find(".post-title th").text(); navlink = '<a class="nav-link" href="'+id+'"><span>'+name+'</span></a>' $(".nav-post-wrapper").append(navlink); }); };

Thanks, I'll check them out.

I would assume that these buttons work just as well for a reset button since it's the same kind switch?

Of course purchasing a switch would be the least troublesome option. I should look into this in more detail to see what kind of switches they offer. It's possible that I could simply modify the look of the button given it has the clearance required for the chassis.

Sounds complicated, is this something that is implemented in current PCs? Can i avoid this by having a non-conductive surface as the one I physically press, while the underlying material that contacts the cables is still conductive?

Ok, thanks. Here are some in-progress renderings of the chassis. Maybe a week of work and the design is finished for prototyping and manufacturing. That sounds like agood idea, how exactly is surge protection implemented for a power button?

Alright, so touching both pins with an electrically conductive surface will start the PC? E.g. pushing the start button (which is electrically conductive) onto the ends of the + and - cable will work as a start button. Or does the PSU also have to be flicked from off to on at the same time?

Hi, I'm working on a chassis design and I have a question regarding how a start button functions. (not sure if this is the right subforum) Normally, the front IO start button cables are plugged into two motherboard connectors, plus and minus. But if there is no start button present, you can start the PC by making contact to both the + and - pins on the motherboard with an electrically conductive material and flipping the power switch on the power supply. So if i want to fabricate a custom power button, will it work like i've drawn in this picture? Sorry for the poor quality of the drawing, I hope it still conveys what i mean. The contact between the metal piece and wire ends essentially close the loop which starts the PC, is this correct?

But how can jquery return different values when grabbing values from css as compared to calculating the values entirely in jquery? Jquery returns 2vw = 37.6 when the value is defined entirely in jquery, but returns 37.5938 when the value 2vw is taken from css. Shouldn't both calculations return the same value? I havn't read about floating point arithmetic, but it doesn't make sense to me that the "same" calculation returns different results. EDIT: I get it now, I guess I'll have to think of a way to rewrite my function.

Hi, I have stumbled across a wierd issue with my code. I'm trying to offset and slider left and right when i click another element and for some reason, the jquery calculations return inaccurate values. I've created a small example of what happens in this pen. The end result is that the slider moves slightly less than it should which causes issues with other functions that use the values. https://codepen.io/niklas-bagge/pen/bGoJRNK?editors=1111 Am i crazy or should the console not return exactly 5? (now returning 5.000932713641037) I'm sure I've missed something really silly, help is much appreciated. EDIT: I might have come up with a dirty solution that uses math.round() to correct the jquery output to match the css. Needs to be tested first though. Did not work as values no longer represent the true css values. EDIT2: It appears the viewport value 2vw is being incorrectly calculated in css, very strange.

ah, thanks.