Jump to content

waxdt

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    23

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

6 Followers

Contact Methods

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Boekel, Netherlands
  • Interests
    Gaming, Hardware, Programming, Software, Music
  • Member title
    Junior Member

waxdt's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

9

Reputation

  1. waxdt
    @sgtrecker78 Seeing as you posted incompatible hardware earlier this post. You completely invalidated your claims of being a google engineer.
  2. waxdt
    Don't charge too much at first. You want to build a relationship with people so that you can help them with there computer later on. Later on you can charge some more but if you keep your prices reasonable people will start talking about you and you might get to help more people out.
  3. waxdt
    @waxdt Great giveaway guys! Keep up the good work.
  4. waxdt
    That would be a excellent option for the price.
  5. waxdt
    Well not really it will allow you to play all modern games on 1080p easily but a good 1080p monitor is worth the money like the LG IPS237 IPS for cheap price.
  6. waxdt
    That looks good to me. You are cheaping out on the monitor and motherboard though not sure if that motherboard supports overclocking.
  7. waxdt
    You must consider that the 760 also has overclocking headroom over the 660ti and overclocking depens on the quality of the GPU some overclock really well and some don't overclock at all. So generaly going with the best stock speed graphics card is the best choice.
  8. waxdt
    Theres no reason to buy a xeon its a waste of money for a gaming rig. Xeons are designed for constant 100% workload in server and profesional workstation enviorments. For a consumer gaming rig buying a xeon is not worth the money and you can't overclock them. If you buy the i5 you have way more headroom in performance due to the fact that you can overclock them.
  9. waxdt
    7950 or a GTX 760 if you want to benefit from upcoming features like shadowplay
  10. waxdt
    Ok my fault. Searched for it but not hard enough
  11. waxdt
    Just did the calculations. A 12K 16:9 display would actualy need to be 11,520 x 6,480 pixels.
  12. waxdt
    I know its kinda cheesy how microsoft advertised it as 12K gaming. Don't think theres even a official name for this insane resolution.
  13. waxdt
    Microsoft demos a three-display 4K setup running Dirt3 on Windows 8 at 11,520 x 2,160 resolution at 30 Hz, and running Dirt3 on a single 4K Display at 60 Hz using Multi-Stream Transport (MST). Apparently they had to get a experimental driver from AMD to support the huge resolution. Full story from microsoft: http://blogs.windows.com/windows/b/extremewindows/archive/2013/07/25/pushing-the-12k-pc-gaming-boundary-at-1-5-billion-pixels-per-second.aspx
  14. waxdt
    waxdt
  15. waxdt
    Having to deal with EA 24/7
×