redteam4ever

The path is case-sensitive (at least on a server, Firefox can repair wrong case locally, no clue about other browsers). Are your folders named exactly the same like in the path? Quick note: If the style.css is in folder css and that folder is in the HTML location the link should be: <link rel="stylesheet" href="css/style.css"> If the style.css is in folder css and the HTML is in some other folder, but both have the same parent folder, the link should be: <link rel="stylesheet" href="../css/style.css">

The path is wrong, try this: <link rel="stylesheet" href="css/style.css">

I am going to correct myself a bit and clarify the word "supported". By supported I didn't mean that there are like updates and/or some day it will stop working and nobody could connect to a 802.11g network. There isn't a red button that destroys all 802.11g devices. The only thing that can happen with any wireless standard is that ITU (International Telecommunication Union) or any local spectrum management authority decides to dedicate the band for some other use and using devices operating on this frequency would be then illegal (check this out). But the devices would still work.

If it isn't connected to a wireless network it can't be showing any packets sent or received. G standard is still supported, although the transmitting device has to be in mixed mode if it supports newer standards such as 802.11n or ac. Products with Wi-Fi logo are designed to be backwards compatible with older standards, so 802.11g will be supported as long as the newer standard runs on 2.4GHz.

The design of MSI gaming laptops got so old, it has actual wrinkles now

Well, I can't see the whole thing but when I was doing this stuff, we were required to write a formula we used, units during all the steps and use a scientific notation with one sentence on the end that includes the final result. I don't know what requirements your teacher have, but it might be something from my list. EDIT: Actually, the best way to find out is asking them... And, BTW, you have a typo in your signature, check the spelling of your mouse.

Since I see that you probably just want to verify your result, here it is: We can ignore the top and bottom of the cylinder since the cylinder's top area is replacing missing area on the prism, so we just compute the surface of the prism (640cm2) and add area of the cylinder's wall (and that's basically the area of rectangle where one side is circumference of the cylinder and the other side is its width - 31.4cm2). TL;DR: The surface area of that object is 671.4cm2.

The chances are slim, check out WD's SecurePark™ or APM Head Parking. SSD is kind of living its own life. You create a file and you put it into a folder, that's all you see. Then there is the OS view - the filesystem. Filesystem is holding everything together - maps the layout of your drive, stores all kinds of data about your data (the metadata). So damaging the filesystem is the first thing that can happen - metadata can get corrupted (modern FS have ways to prevent corruption). When you have a hard drive, it's very straightforward - data is written onto the platter and that's all. SSDs behave differently. SSD have cells which are divided into pages and blocks. But NAND flash chips used in SSDs can erase only the whole block. If SSD is erasing the block, remaining data has to go to cache. There are clever ways that prevent this, such as TRIM, but SSDs move the files quite often also for wear-leveling or other maintenance. Also there is the SSD cache. Newly written file goes there first while it's being written to the NAND chip(s) - since the cache is usually a RAM chip, well... you know what happens when the power goes out. Enterprise SSDs have a backup power that can copy the cache though, so they're safe(r?).

The chances are slim, check out WD's SecurePark™ or APM Head Parking.

That's me, lol I played Escape the Space Station VR on Vive and if I leave out that it was very unfinished that it didn't even have any kind of menu (oh, and I couldn't get to the second part of the ship because the door glitched), it was a pretty good experience. I'm still not sold on the switching thing, though, maybe if it was automatic - like when doing puzzles that are right in front of you and nothing is going on around you? But it's an interesting idea.

That wouldn't be more expensive than a headset at all When you make VR an option, I don't think that the level of immersion in the experience would allow you to even think about switching the modes (let's suppose that VR apps are more refined than now). The point of the headset is replacing your entire field of vision - unless the room would be the perfect sphere, I don't think that would work (or work better than a headset).

AMD uses E for low TDP chips. As in A12-9800E (35W) and A12-9800 (65W). The abbreviaton of Extended Frequency Range is also XFR.

He's busy building Floatplane, but he said that he will appear in the videos occasionally.

This company seems to be supported by HTC, so that might be the plan.

This add-in was already discussed in the news section, but now it's launching and there is a brief review published. I'm not really into VR - I tried Vive for a couple of hours in a local VR arena and I have to say, that the cable is really annoying and the screen resolution is too low for my taste. It looks like that in this headset generation at least one of my concerns might get solved. The Tom's hardware article is unclear on launch dates, but it appears that this add-in is launching in the US on 25th September (Microsoft Store). Price is 299$, but that product page has no useful info other than the release date (after adding it to the cart). I would like to add that my local reseller in Slovakia - Alza.sk/Alzashop.com (Alzashop is their effort to go international) - has it listed for preorder for 447€. Expected shipping date is 21st September. All kinds of useful info can be found in this article at Tom's hardware. What is more useful is a brief review posted on a website uploadvr.com. The things that matter, of course, are the picture quality and latency: This is a good sign. The lack of A/B testing worries me a bit, but if the latency was terrible, they would notice. For more info, visit the article. And one interesting tidbit for the end of the post. The F.A.Q. section reveals that the battery supports hot-plugging: So, what do you think? I think that it's great to see some progress, but we'll need to wait for more thorough reviews and see how well it performs and what the final price will be. For now, even 299$ is too much when you add it to the cost of the PC and headset. This is also an opportunity for @Slick to appear in front of the camera. I think that this is a good review material. (PRESS CONTACT)

No, definitely not. I didn't word my last post very well. I just wanted to be funny and point out that motherboards might actually expire, but it's not common as people pointed out in the discussion I linked. Try borrowing a PSU from a friend for testing, it certainly is easier to swap than a motherboard.

FUN FACT: They might. I bought a SATA to USB converter and it came with a small PSU that looked like a laptop power brick adapted to molex. When I powered it up, the input capacitor blew up, with PSU cover almost hitting my eye, because I had noticed the smoke coming out of the brick and leaned over to shut the power. See this interesting discussion on capacitor shelf life: https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/8794/do-electrolytic-capacitors-have-a-limited-shelf-life

To me, this looks like a motherboard problem. You are getting random errors, and as I read your other posts, everything might be caused by the motherboard (except the buzzing noise). My second theory is the PSU. What PSU are you running? PSUs can make weird noises and if they do, that's definitely a problem. Unstable power delivery can cause a lot of weird problems. When you hear the buzzing noise, try slowing all your fans (except the PSU fan) with a finger. PLEASE, DON'T STICK YOUR FINGER IN BLADES, just gently push the rotating center of the fan and look for change in the noise. If that is not changing the noise, it's the PSU.

Gboard and Google Launcher for that stock Android feeling

I started typing the answer and then decided that I don't want to reinvent the wheel by writing an answer. So I used Google. This article sums it up pretty nicely.

Yes, if you don't want to use ethernet. This board has a Realtek ethernet NIC and according to this review, it's not that great. From the case standpoint, I don't see any problems in terms of cooling, but building in small cases is more difficult and require more time and dedication to cable management. So, maybe swapping case and board would be better since there is also a price premium for ITX parts.

ITX or Mini-ITX is just about size of the board. Are they less powerful? Yes and no, depends on usage. ITX boards have only one PCI-E slot for expansion. They usually offer weaker (but still adequate) power delivery system due to the limited space, but this affects only serious overclockers. Also, they have only 2 DIMM slots that limits maximum RAM capacity. As for Mini-ITX cases, depending on model they may offer worse airflow and/or limited compatibility with other components (smaller PSUs, smaller fans, CPU cooler height, GPU length...) due to space limitations.