slowdeath008
-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
slowdeath008 got a reaction from Nasosdem in LMG Last Video Comparing Mistake? Waiting Official Answer
bump.
-
slowdeath008 got a reaction from Nasosdem in LMG Last Video Comparing Mistake? Waiting Official Answer
Yes but 436 to 560 is a long way
-
slowdeath008 got a reaction from Nasosdem in LMG Last Video Comparing Mistake? Waiting Official Answer
Other benchmarks seem out of spec based on other youtubers too. They must have gotten the simulation of the i5 7400 wrong.
-
slowdeath008 reacted to MageTank in LMG Last Video Comparing Mistake? Waiting Official Answer
They also tested all of the games at 4k, when the GPU was the bottleneck, and wondered why the results were basically the same. This is exactly why I tell people to check multiple sources when it comes to reviews. LTT's methodologies are getting worse every day.
-
slowdeath008 reacted to Wolther in LMG Last Video Comparing Mistake? Waiting Official Answer
Yep. Everything about this video seemed off and very weird.. Not only that, why'd they even play the games in 4k? If they wanted to see CPU bottleneck then they should've stressed the GPU as little as possible
-
slowdeath008 got a reaction from The Sloth in LMG Last Video Comparing Mistake? Waiting Official Answer
Yes but 436 to 560 is a long way
-
slowdeath008 got a reaction from shadowbyte in Core i3 7350K Overclockable Dual Core Review
LTT you uploaded a bugged cinebench score. i5 should not perform that low. The 6400 did 496 on cinebench. And if you make 150 single core performance * 4 you should get around 600. Actually its 545 based on other sources. You are the only site that recommends the i3 7350k with every other youtuber getting better scores on both synthetic and real world benchmarks.