Jump to content

is it safe to assume that the 2400G will trump any and all laptops that has GPUs below the GTX1050-level?

  1. Skanky Sylveon

    Skanky Sylveon

    Probably not.  See next post.

    image.png.1fe4709ca315fdac7750c7f07eecb2b1.png

     

    While the 1050 ti is faster then the 1050, it's not over twice as fast.

  2. Skanky Sylveon

    Skanky Sylveon

    It seems to be slightly better then the 1030 in most cases.

     

  3. Noyu

    Noyu

    yea but I'm trying to compare with laptop GPUs especially NVIDIA's MX series ahahaha

  4. Hiitchy

    Hiitchy

    Well it would be better than my 940mx and i5-7200u, that's for sure. 

  5. Skanky Sylveon

    Skanky Sylveon

    @Noyu Oh...

    I can't find a direct comparison, but here is this.

    image.png.9ce53977a34cc72bb5ee23ff1d9012b8.png

    Vs

    image.png.ef5a74a2223ee14cb931513f86478401.png

     

    The top is using high settings, which is why the lower frame rate.

    It's safe to say that the 2400G outright beats the MX series.

     

    The 960M is questionable, and the 970M and 980M will probably outright beat the 2400G.

  6. Noyu
×