finador090

I think The LG Ultra Short Throw projector delivers vivid imagery within an exceptionally short distance of the projection surface. Set it just 5 inches away to get 60 inches of bright, vivid viewing, or go farther to get images up to 100 inches.

Wow, thank you all, and any idea of the async compute? if its gonna be implemented in a lot of '' normal'' games? I guess know ill just wait to get even more information, but my first option is, as of now the 290x. Again thank you all for the response.

Hi everyone, i hope you are in anyway know something about the recent benchmarks on Ashes of the Singularity and their Directx 11 to Directx 12 jump in performance (or not so jump). I have been building my first PC (here are the specs i guess) Amd FX-3820 (3,5 Ghz) ''A 9 year old gpu 200x radeon series'' 16 Gb of Ram 2Tb+240Gb ssd Asrock 970 extreme4 And i plan to play on a 1600x900p display and as i was watching from a distance, as i hadn't bought a gpu yet, the flame and the misinformation on this topic. So now i am more confused to which gpu i should put my money now. Now here comes the real question. I, have no trust over nvidia, you in particular might trust them i don't and will never judge you for that, but i see them like a bit under the desk company and i don't intend to play games that use a lot of what a typical RTS game would use, i will just play some League of legends, some Triple A titles and CS:GO. Should i stick with a 960 gtx that i was planing to buy to use for the next 3 years or so? Should i follow the instinct and go with a 290x or 390x? Is async compute an important crucial perk of DX12 or is this just something that happens to be in this game and that only these type of games will use? Disclaimer: I want both your opinion and recommendation at the moment, as im sure Nvidia will do something with the async compute, and that its still a reputable brand, as well amd, And that more information will come, but i really want to know if i was obligated to buy something right now and what you will do. Also remember the 900p i'll be using and the CPU that i have. External links: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440575-oxides-kollack-responds-to-aots-and-vendor-bias-conspiracies/ http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/432063-first-directx-12-game-benchmarked-update-2-more-benchmarks/#entry5792302 Have a nice day everyone

Thank you all for help, i will consider the 280. If not i will just sell my body and then buy a Gtx 970 and a 1080p monitor

Wish i could, i actually bought a monitor, but i use it as a TV, and the prices just keep rising. Thank you tho.

Wow really? Hard to find people playing at that res :lol: . With the 750 ti, do you game on ultra or just high? I think anyway ill go for a 960 just to be able to run really stable future games

Thank you, it never crossed my mind. But I have a 750w Power Supply , will that be enough? Because from my experience Amd eats all the power it can get

Hi everyone, i was planing to buy a GTX 970 but since i'm in europe, prices just keep going up. So i started looking more for a 960 (any of the 4gb vram versions) and i was searching any benchmarks anyone has done at a resolution of 1600x900, as everyone just test it at 1080p. As i seen, the 960 doesn't work bad at 1080, but as i'm not going to be gaming at that resolution, (not that i dont want, i just cant) i don't have a basic idea of what FPS i will get running it for myself, as im searching for a more stable fps rather than an 1080p expirience. And i was hoping if anyone has got any kind of idea for it, or if themselfs play with this card at this resolution Tanks for your time

I think it might me a mixture of both. I have gotten 2 more fans for the case, and now it never reaches the 60º, but the CPU usage is still the same, But no crashes or anything. Thank you for your attention senpai

Hi everyone. Recently i have build a new (and first) PC, but, as i was doing and buying it piece by piece i got to a point in which i just needed the graphics card. So i searched and found a very old graphics card, its an ATI Radeon from the 600x series, and i was wondering if the card could be in anyway damaging to the rest of my computer, as im getting quite some Cpu temperatures and sometimes the OS crashes, Here are my Specs OS Name Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Version 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601 OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation System Name FINADOR-PC System Manufacturer To Be Filled By O.E.M. System Model To Be Filled By O.E.M. System Type x64-based PC Processor AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor, 3500 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s) BIOS Version/Date American Megatrends Inc. P2.60, 11/11/2013 SMBIOS Version 2.7 Windows Directory C:\Windows System Directory C:\Windows\system32 Name RADEON X600 Series (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM) PNP Device ID PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_5B62&SUBSYS_21021458&REV_00\4&F1D09F1&0&0010 Adapter Type Not Available, ATI Technologies Inc. compatible Adapter Description RADEON X600 Series (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM) Adapter RAM 256,00 MB (268.435.456 bytes) Installed Drivers atiumdag,atiumdva,atiumd64.dll,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64 Driver Version 8.56.1.16 INF File atiilhag.inf (ati2mtag_RV380x section) Color Planes Not Available Color Table Entries 4294967296 Resolution 1280 x 1024 x 60 hertz Could it be that in any way the GPU is making the cpu work harder? Or a bad airflow of the case? Because on a minimum usage of the computer, the cpu usage shown in Task manager reaches more than 70% Thank you and sorry for my bad english