Jump to content

ChalkChalkson

Member
  • Posts

    1,205
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

4 Followers

About ChalkChalkson

  • Birthday Jan 03, 1997

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

1,761 profile views
  1. I'll take a look again Yeah GN testing suggested 4x vs 2x made about 8% performance difference on CL14 3200, the price difference was like 5-10€, so that's probably very cost effective, similar story for CL14 vs CL16... Looks like a fair amount of the real cost of Ryzen is in the better RAM you need to use it most efficiently Thanks a lot!
  2. ffs I can't believe I screwed this up twice... I'm in bed now, but here is an imgur link to the parts list I'll edit it tomorrow with the PC partpicker
  3. Oh yeah here is a PC partpicker list. Though the price on the memory is slightly above what mindfactory shows.
  4. Hey, A friend of mine asked me for help in upgrading the PC I built for him in 2014. Due to the GPU shortage he'll probably keep rocking his 970 for a while, but this is the new stuff which I'll probably suggest to him. Besides playing games (though mostly stuff like LoL and Anno) he uses his PC for running scripts he writes for his MSc project. I know his code though, he rarely multi-threads The part I'm most unsure about is the RAM MoBo pairing. GN's testing suggested to me that 4x 3200 14-14-14 memory is still very cost effective (3600 cl14 would be at least 20% more expensive if I checked right) - though I could have interpreted that completely wrong. Both the board and the ram kit are rated for 3200, but the QVL of the motherboard has it listed as such with "native" 2133 speed, while some other 3200 kits are listed as native 3200. Does that mean I shouldn't expect them to work together cleanly at 3200, or just that I actually have to enable XMP? Speaking of XMP, this kit doesn't have the "v" in that column either which slightly concerns me.. I know this is a bit more in depth on the questions than these posts typically are, but if you know the answer to either of those questions, or spotted anything else weird about the component list, please let me know And thanks for taking the time to read this either way!
  5. I terminated the ends pretty recently (like 3 weeks ago? the issue is a bit older) when I did I checked continuity with a multimeter - the cables are all in tact and wired up in matching ways. If you asked me whether I wired it matching or crosswired (A-A or A-B) I couldn't tell you though. Is that a potential cause?
  6. Appears that the link into the basement is limited to 100Mb - or at least plugging my laptop into that switch only allows me to transfer to it from my PC at 100Mb, while transfering to it when plugged into the ground floor router works at Gb. This is hella annoying the cable is pretty long and passes through multiple concrete walls / ceilings without cable channels O.o
  7. Yeah it's not a switch it's a router switch AP combo. But I use it as a switch + AP, got some for cheap a while ago. What do you mean by trunk cables? The cables that go from the devices to the switches and switches to the patch panels? Those are all Gb. One of the first things I checked^^
  8. Task manager network tab (what I show above) shows bit. The transfer window (what I showed there wasn't a windows file transfer so I can't take the corresponding snapshot) does show MB. Windows transfers when I do them tend to clock in at ~10MB/s
  9. The two switches are identical, they're Asus AC1900s which are gigabit switches (again I managed to get gigabit speeds to different point in the network through either of them)
  10. router at ground level, cat6 patch running to a switch on the first floor and basement each, my PC and NAS are plugged into those respectively
  11. Jup, you can see in the screenshot that they both show that they are hooked up at gigabit. And again, both managed to get 200Mb to my router
  12. I'm talking about writes inside the network here, not my connection to the internet. Though when I had 200Mb/s internet I got those speeds on both my NAS and my PC
  13. MSI Z170 titanium on my PC and uh... some AsRock B365 on the NAS. I don't have a great way to test it from all systems, but when I'm very close in the network to the NAS I can write to it at Gb. And my PC can write to other PCs that are close in the network at Gb, too I think.
  14. Huh. Windows task manager shows 90MBit/s. No idea whats wrong with the picture - shows it fine on my end
×