So I guess I was right You can pay 2x the money and get ~10% performance boost over a TR 1950X, while requiring more exotic and expensive cooling and drawing more power. Or just go Threadripper...
Yeah, better do that instead.
-
Even with the teething issues on TR, it's so worth it
- Technomancer__ and XenosTech
- 2
-
4.1GHz? Come on! That chip can definitely handle a 4.8GHz overclock. Intel should have soldered these CPUs.
BTW, the stock Cinebench scores are just bad. @done12many2 Managed to get 3200 ish points with a 7920X at 4.8GHz.
-
@PCGuy_5960 Yeah, the chip probably can handle that OC, it's the motherboard that I'd be concerned about when overclocking that high And the power supply
Though I remember you mentioned that they used an ASRock board in their previous X299 benchmarks that you said was bad, this time it's the Aorus Gaming 9 so it should be fine, right?
The fact that you need to spend a lot more money to actually see any relevant performance gains (overclocking past 4,6-4,7GHz) makes this purchase a lot less compelling and viable, the 16C i9 is a better buy IMO because as we've seen, even some professional workloads don't scale beyond 32T and we can see the 16C part actually preforming better in some cases due to higher clock speeds.
In reality though... For 2k USD compared to a 16C 1950X for 1k USD is just a ridiculous price/performance gap and even the raw performance gap doesn't make the 18C 7980XE a viable option. A pretty useless product if you asked me
This obviously doesn't work that way, but you can have 32 Threadripper cores for the price of 18 X299 cores...
-
4.5K? You can probably do that with a delid and a custom loop.
At 6.1GHz it should be able to get 5870 points, but I doubt that it was stable enough to run Cinebench.