beingGamer

Rubber band and screwdriver, it should work for screws. Also if you lucky you may find right flat screwdriver size to fit it and take out them screws. 
Most likely it’s thermal paste, 2yrs on laptop is some time plus you don’t know what tp they used at first place.

I t ' s   t i m e   f o r   C r a z y   T a x i !

These will go nicely with my gaming underwear.

no RGB not interested. 

http://comparesizes.com/
 
Found this site which gives a relative comparison between objects of different dimensions.
Maybe useful to compare case sizes, thought to share here.

http://comparesizes.com/
 
Found this site which gives a relative comparison between objects of different dimensions.
Maybe useful to compare case sizes, thought to share here.

Nvidia:
"Oh shoot, locking our special display technology off makes people less likely to buy our graphics cards for adaptive sync"
Nvidia, later:
"Oh shoot, enabling the open standard Freesync on our GPUs has made people stop buying our really expensive monitors"

The difference in power draw amounts to 5$ yearly in most cases. You'd need to run both cards maxed constantly for 4 years before the Nvidia efficiency makes a difference.

Technically speaking you could get i9 performance for the same price as the i7 with the 3700X

Get the 3700X - it's equal to the 9700K in games, obliterates it in everything else, uses less power, runs cooler, has a real upgrade path up to 16/32 3950X unlike 1151 where you are stuck with a dead socket and a max of a 8/16 space heater (aka 9900K). Lastly, the 3700X is not affected by the multiple security flaws in Intel CPUs that necessitate security patches and constantly degrade performance.

Mission Accomplished  

Wow... Google Home is next gen spying taken to the extreme.

Which is faster, a sports car or a dump truck?
 
Well.. It depends on what you're doing with it

yay! @Joka232 made one for me
It's good, I like it

Hallelujah! I did it!!!! It took me so long, thank you for telling me what to do guys  .
 
Edit: Although I am going to ask my teacher about the efficiency of my code because I ended up making 12 functions and 11 variables...

sure, but you will have to wait a bit.
Will write and share once I reach home
7-8 hours to go 

Hallelujah! I did it again with only 2 functions this time (technically 4, I had 1 for input, 1 for display), here is my code, please give me some feedback on it
// // main.c // Lab 9 Test // #include <stdio.h> int input(int); int div_func(int, int); int mod_func(int, int); void display(int, int, int, int, int); int main() { //Declaring input variable int a; //This variable will be used only in calculations int b = 10000; //Variables to store digits for displaying int idigit1, idigit2, idigit3, idigit4, idigit5, modres1, modres2, modres3, modres4; //Input a = input(a); //Calculations idigit1 = div_func(a, b); modres1 = mod_func(a, b); //Divide the value of b by 10 each time the line is written to make correct calculations b /= 10; idigit2 = div_func(modres1, b); modres2 = mod_func(modres1, b); b /= 10; idigit3 = div_func(modres2, b); modres3 = mod_func(modres2, b); b /= 10; idigit4 = div_func(modres3, b); modres4 = mod_func(modres3, b); b /= 10; idigit5 = div_func(modres4, b); display(idigit1, idigit2, idigit3, idigit4, idigit5); system("pause"); return 0; } //Input int input(int value) { puts("Please input a value between 1 and 32767"); scanf("%d", &value); return(value); } //Division function int div_func(int a1, int b1) { //Variables to store calculations int storage; //Calculation storage = a1 / b1; return (storage); } //Modulus Function int mod_func(int a1, int mod_b) { //Variables to store calculations int mod_storage; //Calculation mod_storage = a1 % mod_b; return (mod_storage); } //Display Function void display(fdigit1, fdigit2, fdigit3, fdigit4, fdigit5) { printf("\n\nThe digits spread out are:\n%d %d %d %d %d\n", fdigit1, fdigit2, fdigit3, fdigit4, fdigit5); } Edit: I have a line: system ("pause"); That's just a codeblocks thing don't worry about it.

Give it a few years and they will remove the big hole at the top so it can be waterproof

Guys, it's a feature, not an issue

It's called iLoadIndicator

I can agree with that, yeah.
 
I still see no reason behind removing the jack though. They've gotten nothing from it and haven't put a good alternative forward that didn't already exist and wouldn't have been there anyways. Seems like being different for the sake of being different.

If Apple truly cared about advancing wireless audio, they'd make a free lossless codec (even better: open source) for Bluetooth or another wireless protocol. They haven't. The specification for Bluetooth 5.0 has been released and it does not to my knowledge contain any audio enhancements. We'll see Bluetooth 5.0 devices next year and they will have the same crappy sound and so will the iPhone. Even if Bluetooth 5.0 did have improved sound, your iPhone would still be crap because it would be stuck with 4.2.
 
It's just not there and won't be any time soon. I don't know the pricing for apt-x but I'm sure it's not cheap since it's not in any way ubiquitous. That's what's holding Bluetooth audio back: you need an entire ecosystem where each part has an aptx license to get decent audio. If aptx or a better free codec was part of the Bluetooth spec it would almost be a non-issue.

Just deal with it..
 

better buy guns than pc then

When you start to neglect responsibilities in order to game.