CyberAtlas

This statement is false. The gpu and cpu are completely seperate die. There is no way to fit 1,000 shader cores into a cpu die. As said before the specs are X86 based. Which means they sre also using desktop based graphics cards. Plus specs reveal AMD based hardware. So theroetically if we load same drivers or similar hardware on a pc, Or adaped drivers, we should actually be able to run the PS4 on a PC. A problem i can see is that specific drivers may be needed to function, and also, the OS may need to adapt to higher spec systems. So some modifications may be required. For example, my laptop has 1300 shader cores, all are a little larger and more powerful, but PS4 has 1100 slightly smaller and lesser powerful shader cores. (2.6Tflops vs 1.8Tflops) The PS4 may not know how to use this extra amount of horsepower. And may crash the system, or simply not use it. I would love it if we could adapt the system to actually use the extra horsepower. It would make PC enthusiasts much more willing to play. I think Sony would make a lot of money selling the OS to people, mostly PC enthusiasts, who think they want a better experience than what the PS4 already offers. Id love to be able to play games with my friends ps4s, and have a rig that gives me much better graphics, and less lag.

I am thinking of reversing my driver too, i saw a FPS performance on one game drop from a usual 140+ to 80-. Not happy.

One thing I am gonna start doing is using Avermedia Live Gamer Portable with a 256 GB SD card to record my HDMI output. It has its own onboard encoder, so the actual system is not lagged by it.

And everyone! Everyones PC build is their own preference. Stop judging them on it unless it really is something that makes absolutely no logical sense.

To be safe get 800W because it looks as if your going to be overclocking some things.

Its all preference man. Just mechanical ones are the hype right now. No biggie.

Well, that is easily if in x16 32 PCIe lanes MINIMUM!!!

makes sense. I havent seen this on previous computers before. Thanks for the help!

It will work, it just is the monitors refresh rate. The gpu has to do the real processing, but the gpu can be slower, at the pace or even faster depending on what your FPS is. But yes, it will work. Just depends on how fast your GPU is able to create a frame.

I got it brand new from MSI. Should not have had those drivers on their in the first place.

Umm, DERP. NO ITS NOT. Stock coolers are supposed to be sufficient, at keeping them at stable temperatures, not completely overclocked like temperatures.

Check to make sure you have Thermal paste, if not, PUT IT ON. Second, you probably have viruses everywhere. Lol. That, or your bios is screwed up to the point it is overclocking itself.

The hell you doing?

Does trying to program your own game count?

Ok, the 4790K has 8MB of cache, same goes to the AMD versions, however, AMDs dont have hyper threading, so Intel can add more cache with half of the physical cores to still have the same ammount, and possibly better efficiency. Because there are two logical ALUs per physical core, this allows for a greater efficiency in all senarios, plus, in all ways, most of the time, the 5960X does have some bottleneck, but only when you mess up the actual bios. Because you can create issues because some games arent optimised for more than eight cores, things start getting weird when 16 appears. But that doesnt mean Directx 12 wont be the one to change that. So stop listening to rumors, and, JUST WAIT.