-
Posts
2,298 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Awards
This user doesn't have any awards
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Berlin, Germany
System
-
CPU
AMD RYZEN 7 5800x3D
-
Motherboard
MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk
-
RAM
F4-3600C15D-16GTZ
-
GPU
RTX 2080Ti
-
Case
Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL ROG
-
Storage
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB, Crucial MX500 500GB
-
PSU
Corsair HX1200
-
Display(s)
DELL AW2521H 360Hz, LG24GM77-B 144Hz
-
Cooling
Custom Loop
-
Keyboard
Razer Huntsman Tournament Edition
-
Mouse
Razer Viper Mini, Logitech G PRO Wireless
-
Sound
Soundblaster ZXR
-
Operating System
Windows10 PRO 64bit
Recent Profile Visitors
2,443 profile views
DarkSmith2's Achievements
-
well it depends what part of the site you use as a source. I use the real comparisson of more or less recent real benchmarks using the same testing setup, rather than an artificial number that is clustered together out of various different testing setups where a conclusion is based on an unrealistic approach to compare hardware with each other. Lets take another look at another benchmark, you claim a 6950xt is 10% faster than a 4070ti at 4k? What testing results specifically make you think that way? That would make a 6950xt 21% faster than a 6900xt aswell. I mean i cant proof any better how pathetic that is.
-
When that would be the case, why doesnt this claimed performance of the chart represent actual benchmark results. If a 6950xt would be 20% faster than a 4070, it would almost be as fast as a 7900xt. OR faster than a 4070ti. In this chart that would mean that a 7900xt is almost 40% faster than a 4070. I mean where is your common sense?
-
well if you want to argue you better put a link of the source, so we know what we are looking at. For what i know this is comparing performance to another GPU as baseline, so f.e. 4070 is 100% faster than 2080ti, 6950xt is 119% faster than 2080ti In the same test, that doesnt mean that 4070 is 19% slower than a 6950xt. You just have to understand the purpose of this database, and how its done. I think it even compares to a way slower card, iirc. So its you, not understanding this chart.. that makes you believe that a 6950xt is 20% faster than a 4070. When its absolutely not.
-
cheapest 4070 on newegg is $549.99. However ehm all old gen cards are not worth buying anymore since 4070 and 7800xt release. Buying used always comes with a caveat, you probably have to clean the card, have to replace pads, have to repaste, so you put time, little more money and effort in it and still probably have a product with less lifetime, efficiency and features left. For it to be a good deal the card would have to be in a really good shape/condition or way cheaper than just $150 bucks less, compared to similar performance when buying brand new. Or in other words a used 6900xt or 6950xt aren't worth more than $300/$350 anymore. If you pay more its a ripoff / delusional.