DarkSmith2

Still not convinced about 4070super? Up to 20% performance for 50bucks more than 4070..

Its only gonna get more expansive. And if you can skip an entire generation/upgrade cycle by paying more now you'll probably even safe money in the end.

Honestly for 600bucks a 4070super has great price to performance ratio and the best available Featureset on top of it. Cant make a better purchase, all other options have way more downsides.

Would just increase the Budget a little and get a 4070super. Especially if you started to like single player games. DLSS might come in handy.

or its just like i said a very "inaccurate" way to compare performance.

6900xt vs 6950xt not 6950xt vs 4070.

well everyone can sometimes misunderstand what someone else said, that doesnt relate to intelligence. It relates to miscommunication. And i dont need to make excuses to anyone about my intelligence.

this is not meant as an insult. sorry, just spitting out the facts.

sorry your text is so badly edited, that its hard to read, so i skip most of it while reading. if i would do this i wouldnt expect anyone to read it.

well it depends what part of the site you use as a source. I use the real comparisson of more or less recent real benchmarks using the same testing setup, rather than an artificial number that is clustered together out of various different testing setups where a conclusion is based on an unrealistic approach to compare hardware with each other. Lets take another look at another benchmark, you claim a 6950xt is 10% faster than a 4070ti at 4k? What testing results specifically make you think that way? That would make a 6950xt 21% faster than a 6900xt aswell. I mean i cant proof any better how pathetic that is.

see, thats still not 20%.. ? And this is also where reality kicks in... Just easier to compare the 4070FE relative performance to the 6900xt of the very same testing hardware and review. And +/- whatever the 6950xt you think is faster. (its 5%) But yea u start admitting. Thank you

no, i mean its used, its not worth as much as new, thats the point. Its nothing personal.

When that would be the case, why doesnt this claimed performance of the chart represent actual benchmark results. If a 6950xt would be 20% faster than a 4070, it would almost be as fast as a 7900xt. OR faster than a 4070ti. In this chart that would mean that a 7900xt is almost 40% faster than a 4070. I mean where is your common sense?

well if you want to argue you better put a link of the source, so we know what we are looking at. For what i know this is comparing performance to another GPU as baseline, so f.e. 4070 is 100% faster than 2080ti, 6950xt is 119% faster than 2080ti In the same test, that doesnt mean that 4070 is 19% slower than a 6950xt. You just have to understand the purpose of this database, and how its done. I think it even compares to a way slower card, iirc. So its you, not understanding this chart.. that makes you believe that a 6950xt is 20% faster than a 4070. When its absolutely not.

6950xt is only 5% faster than a 6900xt. This is techpowerups review to the 4070 FE. https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4070-founders-edition/32.html A 6950xt is nowhere near 20% faster than a 4070 on a wide average of games.